Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 26 May 2012 (Saturday) 14:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

canon 50mm f1.2 tips needed

 
blueskyyy
Member
198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2009
     
May 26, 2012 14:45 |  #1

Hello everyone, I am planning on buying a canon 50mm /f 1.2.

I have a few questions.. when using these lens wide open for portraits, is it best to shoot single individuals only? Would it be bad if I shot /f 1.2 for couples? Based on my knowledge of aperture, I feel as if I shot a couple in /f 1.2, due to the fact at that aperture is so narrow that one of the couple might be blurry.

To the people that love these lens, what are your apertures, when shooting single, couples, or more people? Sorry if I sound new, I'm just slightly confused with these lens. Thank you in advance!


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/minhie/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kilobit
Member
65 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2012
Location: the Netherlands
     
May 26, 2012 16:05 |  #2

At 1.2 I sometimes even have that one eye is in focus and the other one is not. (on FF)

I definitely would not shoot couples at 1.2

I only use 1.2 where it is really needed due to low light.
At more decent light I start at 2.8


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BryantFC
Goldmember
2,606 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2011
Location: New Orleans, LA
     
May 26, 2012 17:55 |  #3

f1.2 if you're after that artistic look with awesome bokeh, but if you're shooting portraits with the entire face in focus, it's better for you to shoot at f2.0


Mamiya M645 1000S, Mamiya RZ67, Polaroid SX-70 Alpha, Polaroid 250 Auto Land Camera, Leica M3, Canon Elan II
www.bryantphethmanh.co​m (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bryantphethmanh​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Cream of the Crop
5,289 posts
Gallery: 1091 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 16859
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
May 26, 2012 18:05 |  #4

Yeah, unless your couple is perfectly aligned along the focal plain, one will be in focus, the other a blur. f/1.2 will




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
May 26, 2012 23:15 |  #5

If you shoot couples with it, shoot at f4 or f5.6. Not sure what the issue is here.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 27, 2012 00:09 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

sure, if the couple's faces are perfectly aligned and flat ;)


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
May 27, 2012 00:19 |  #7

kin2son wrote in post #14490123 (external link)
sure, if the couple's faces are perfectly aligned and flat ;)

Doesn't have to be perfect. When shooting a couple you should strive to get their faces on the same plane or as close as is practical. At 8 ft at f5.6 the OP would have about 18 inches or so to play with. That's plenty if you are setting up your poses properly.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonYouCan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,489 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 22
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Belgium
     
May 27, 2012 01:26 |  #8

Next to the slow AF, that's the reason I sold my 85 1.2L for a 135 f2L
Almost the face is in focus and the DOF is subliminal. My other "blur-lenses" are the 35L & 85 1.8. You pay a lot for almost 1 complete blurry picture, except 1 eye, seems crazy :)

BryantFC wrote in post #14488981 (external link)
f1.2 if you're after that artistic look with awesome bokeh, but if you're shooting portraits with the entire face in focus, it's better for you to shoot at f2.0


Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
Lighting : Godox AD600B TTL + Godox V860II-S + X1T-S
Modifiers: 60cm Collapsible Silver Beautydish + grid | Godox 120cm Octagon softbox + grid + Speedlite Flash bender
Tripod: Vanguard Alta 253CT carbon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 27, 2012 01:26 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

I was answering to OP....he/she is asking at f1.2 ;)


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
May 27, 2012 11:23 |  #10

kin2son wrote in post #14490254 (external link)
I was answering to OP....he/she is asking at f1.2 ;)

In that case, it's just a rather odd question. I've never seen anyone want to determine what subject to shoot by the f-stop they want to use. It should be the other way around. Of course if for some reason you want to have a couple with one face slightly defocused then by all means shoot it at f1.2 and make sure they aren't on the same plane. But the way it is supposed to work is that you take the subject you have, decide in your mind what you want the photo to look like then set everything up accordingly.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maximus_73
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2012
     
May 27, 2012 12:26 |  #11

if you shoot at 1.2, there will be a major learning curve. The window of error is virtually zero. My advice to you is practice, a lot of practice...


Cameras: Canon EOS M, FujiFilm X-T1| Lenses: FD 50mm 1.4, Fujinon 23mm 1.4, Fujinon 56 1.2, Zeiss 32mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,256 posts
Likes: 1526
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
May 27, 2012 12:28 |  #12

blueskyy, may have some impact on the answer, but what camera are you using for this 50mm?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sir_Loin
Senior Member
Avatar
550 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 112
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Leicestershire UK
     
May 27, 2012 13:49 |  #13

maximus_73 wrote in post #14491634 (external link)
if you shoot at 1.2, there will be a major learning curve. The window of error is virtually zero. My advice to you is practice, a lot of practice...

+1 x 1000!

I'm no novice, but I recently added the 50mm f/1.2L to my lens arsenal and it's been the most challenging lens I've ever owned. The 85mm f/1.2 is a walk in the park compared to the 50! When I get it right, the images are sensational, unique even. It's a lens you have to master to get the best out of it. Don't let that put you off though, the time and effort are worth it!


EOS 1D4, 5D3, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, EF 85mm f/1.2L II * EOS R6, RF 24-105mm f/4.0-7.1 * EOS M5, EF-M 11-22mm f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS, EF-M 22mm f/2.0, EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS * FL-F 300mm f/5.6 FLUORITE, FD 55mm f/1.2 ASPHERICAL, FD 24-35mm f/3.5L, FD 50mm f/1.2L, FD 300mm f/2.8L, FD 50-300mm f/4.5L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,027 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
canon 50mm f1.2 tips needed
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1386 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.