Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 27 May 2012 (Sunday) 07:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens for Canadian Rockies

 
nellyle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 292
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
May 27, 2012 07:45 |  #1

Hi

I'm signing my life away in August and getting married, the honeymoon is booked for late August, Calgary -> Banff -> Lake Louise -> Jasper -> Sun Peaks -> Vancouver over 10 nights.

Looking at my signature, will I be left wanting at the wide end, 28mm being the widest? I've borrowed a 17-40 recently and found it great, just not sure I can get away with another purchase!


5D3, 7D2, 1D3, 40D, 14 f2.8 Samyang, 17-40 L, 28-80 L, 70-200 2.8ii L, 200 2.8ii L, 200-400 L, 1.4 ii,
http://chris-stamp.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dan_bgblue
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 27, 2012 08:09 |  #2

Whatever lens you want buy it NOW!!;)


Gear list: S5IS, 40D, Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM, Canon 50mm f1.8 mk1, Canon 85mm f1.8, Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM, 430EXII, Kenko 1.4x TC, tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimmy_beaner
Member
238 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Des Moines
     
May 27, 2012 08:17 |  #3

5D would get you a bit more "width" O:)


Canon 7D
Canon 35 f/1.4 L,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nellyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 292
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
May 27, 2012 08:18 |  #4

jimmy_beaner wrote in post #14490829 (external link)
5D would get you a bit more "width" O:)

I doubt it would get much more than the 1DS ;)


5D3, 7D2, 1D3, 40D, 14 f2.8 Samyang, 17-40 L, 28-80 L, 70-200 2.8ii L, 200 2.8ii L, 200-400 L, 1.4 ii,
http://chris-stamp.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimmy_beaner
Member
238 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Des Moines
     
May 27, 2012 08:30 |  #5

Well that's what my inability to read gets me :(


Canon 7D
Canon 35 f/1.4 L,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
erda
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
18 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
May 27, 2012 09:17 as a reply to  @ jimmy_beaner's post |  #6

Having spent a lot of time in the Rockies (I live a couple of hours away), I'd suggest an ultra-wide angle lens to fill out your quiver. The 17-40 is a great lens.
If you have time when you're at Lake Louise, head down the #1 to Field, BC (Truffle Pigs is a great place to have lunch/supper) and make sure to take in the Little Yoho Valley (Takakkaw Falls).
Enjoy!


30D; 17-40 f4L; 70-200 f4L; 100 f2.8L macro IS; Tokina 11-16 f2.8; 430EX
G1-X
Olympus TG-1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
May 27, 2012 09:49 |  #7

In the States we can get refurbed ones from Canon USA for hundreds less. Both the mine and wife's L glass comes from Canon USA. I don't know if Canon has such a program in the UK or other parts of Europe. If not, look for a reputable dealer to resells used equipment. Look for a gently used 17-40.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,257 posts
Likes: 1526
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
May 27, 2012 09:53 |  #8

Your shooting full frame so the 28-80L will handle most things and you will only be slightly hampered by something wider. Yes, there are stunning vistas but you are also miles away! I would leave the 200mm 2.8L at home and definitely take the 100-400mm L with the 1.4 TC. That way you can handle the wildlife you might encounter. Take a circular polarizer and maybe consider the purchase or borrow a tripod. If you can get a tripod then consider getting familiar with some stitching software and make some really stunning panoramic images on your return.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nellyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 292
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
May 27, 2012 09:54 as a reply to  @ MCAsan's post |  #9

Pretty sure Canon UK don't offer that. There are plenty of shops offering secondhand though, roughly £400. Or, I just borrow one again!


5D3, 7D2, 1D3, 40D, 14 f2.8 Samyang, 17-40 L, 28-80 L, 70-200 2.8ii L, 200 2.8ii L, 200-400 L, 1.4 ii,
http://chris-stamp.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nellyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 292
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
May 27, 2012 09:55 |  #10

John from PA wrote in post #14491121 (external link)
Your shooting full frame so the 28-80L will handle most things and you will only be slightly hampered by something wider. Yes, there are stunning vistas but you are also miles away! I would leave the 200mm 2.8L at home and definitely take the 100-400mm L with the 1.4 TC. That way you can handle the wildlife you might encounter. Take a circular polarizer and maybe consider the purchase or borrow a tripod. If you can get a tripod then consider getting familiar with some stitching software and make some really stunning panoramic images on your return.

The tripod is covered, I'll pack my 055xprob and ball head.


5D3, 7D2, 1D3, 40D, 14 f2.8 Samyang, 17-40 L, 28-80 L, 70-200 2.8ii L, 200 2.8ii L, 200-400 L, 1.4 ii,
http://chris-stamp.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonswhitelensesrule
Goldmember
Avatar
3,648 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, B.C.
     
May 27, 2012 10:56 |  #11

Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 to go on your 1Ds body.

Great for all the incredibly breath taking scenic/landscape vistas along the world famous Icefields Parkway! (The highway between Banff, and Jasper). Also great for Lake Louise etc.

Go to any calendar store, and check out the "Canadian Rockies", "Banff", "Jasper" etc scenic calendars. It should give you a good idea of what to expect.

You already have medium - long telephoto covered, so why not go for a stunning fixed focal length wide prime.

It is manual focus, but hey, the mountains, trees, and lakes aren't going anywhere!!


Photographers do it in 1/1,000th of a second...but the memory lasts forever! ;)
"It's only cheating if you get caught!" - Al Bundy
People who THINK they know it all really annoy those of us who DO!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,401 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
May 27, 2012 12:03 |  #12

I probably used my EFS 10-22mm lens more on our trip to the Canadian Rockies than any other place we've visited since I entered the dSLR realm 6+ years ago -- and I am not normally an ultra-wide shooter. So, I would think that 28mm would not be wide enough in your situation. A 17-40L would be a nice addition for your trip.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedge
Senior Member
417 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
May 27, 2012 12:30 |  #13

I did Banff/etc with a 17mm as my widest on my 7D, so basically 28mm on a 1DS. I shot plenty of panos and that worked great for me.


7D - 100-400 L, Sigma 28, Sigma 17-70 2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bratkinson
Senior Member
643 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Western MA
     
May 27, 2012 17:41 |  #14

35 years ago, I took the VIA Rail "Canadian" across Canada from Montreal to Vancouver. If I recall, I used my FD 35-70 for most of the shots, but the shots I took with my FD 135 f2 literally blew me away. I had a 100-300 zoom at the time, as well, but found it largely unnecessary as most of what I wanted to shoot was within desireable distances for the two lenses I used most of the time.

In showing some of the slides to friends, they commented on the 'pretty yellow flowers on the moutainside". In reality, the "Yellow Flowers" were fully mature aspen trees! (I went in early October) In short, unless you've seen the Alps, be prepared to be unbelievably "dwarfed" by the Canadian Rockies! I've seen others' pictures where the 20 car Canadian passenger train is about 1/2" tall and the tops of the mountains are out of the picture! (rookie photographers) And that was on a large computer screen!


"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." General George S Patton, Jr 1885-1945

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bosscat
Goldmember
1,892 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
     
May 27, 2012 17:53 |  #15

Bring a pair of bibs, since you will be drooling when you see what you are in store for.

I was through there twice in my life, and its stunning. Hope to do it once where I have all kinds of time for a change.


Your camera is alot smarter than the "M" Zealots would have you believe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,036 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Lens for Canadian Rockies
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1341 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.