Doesn't change it is a downside. So you are saying if you had a choice between two Ferrari cars, that are identical, except one got 10MPG and the other got 30MPG, you would not choose the 30MPG vehicle?
Not including a mRAW and sRAW on such a high resolution camera seems like an oversight to me, on the other hand having a entry level camera that shoots 24MP but doesn't have DoF preview, articulating screen, and auto exposure bracketing among other things seems like a stupid idea as well.
Now I really like the D800, and I like in general what Nikon is doing (and rumored to be doing) recently, but they have the glaring issues that seem so easy to fix yet they do not... makes ya wonder...
If i am buying a ferrari i am not looking at MPG. That is at the bottom of the list. So the difference in MPG for that market of a buyer is truly a non factor. If MPG is a breaking point then you should not be looking at such a high end sports vehicle. Just like if memory is an issue when looking at a D800 then you shouldn't be looking at it. High memory costs will come with the territory in a high MP camera just as high dollars to fill a gas tank will come with owning a ferrari. You know what you are getting yourself into. Want the most resolution on a FF camera today? Pay for the memory to store those images. Want great racing inspired pedigree from ferrari? Then pay to fill up that gas tank more often than you would on a Chevy Volt. 

so everyone goes to college even IF it is Nassau. MY grade will have about 100 kids graduation (a little bit more).

