Fellow photographers,
those of you who are using MF Zeiss lenses and specifically the 35 F/1.4 ZE feel the pain of hitting the focus time and time again. I am using this lens with 5D MKII and AF-confirm is completely not reliable. The obvious solution that is really working is replacing your standard screen with EG-s. As soon as I have done it, the rate of keepers went up to 60-70%, which is not that bad.
5D MKIII brings the new AF system and so many people expected a revolution in the way it works with Zeiss ZE lenses. Is this the case?
Based on what I hear/see, the feedback is mixed - for those working with static objects it is a big improvement and they highlight the fact that they can now fully rely on AF-confirm.
Those who photograph people and therefore depend on super accuracy report that 5D MKIII is a NO GO because there is no "official" way to install the EG-s screen and AF-confirm is not good enough to help precision focusing for street photography or people photography overall.
Here is the discussion on Fred Miranda with good examples:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1099192![]()
This is where I have asked Zeiss about their official statement:
http://www.flickr.com …iscuss/72157629902849374/![]()
So this is what Zeiss replied:
"For the EOS 5DMKIII as well as for the MarkII, we recommend to use a better focusing screen. Such focusing screens (with split-screen image and microprism collar) are offered by Brightscreen for both camera models.
The new AF system of the MarkIII allows a more detailed micro adjustment, but the accuracy of any AF system is still not good enough to focus a f/1.4 lens (at full aperture) precisely enough for high expectations."
How many of you are using this combo and what is your feedback and examples?

