Y'all have the 135L and 1.4x TC as I do. However, y'all also have the 200L which I don't. Have you ever compared these two set-ups as far as IQ goes? What results?
jjonsalt Goldmember 1,502 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Central Florida More info | Dec 09, 2005 12:47 | #1  Permanent banY'all have the 135L and 1.4x TC as I do. However, y'all also have the 200L which I don't. Have you ever compared these two set-ups as far as IQ goes? What results?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PetKal Cream of the Crop  11,141 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Nizza, Italia More info | Dec 09, 2005 13:22 | #2 jjonsalt wrote: Y'all have the 135L and 1.4x TC as I do. However, y'all also have the 200L which I don't. Have you ever compared these two set-ups as far as IQ goes? What results? Sorry,it would be an interesting comparison, but I have not done it. Potenza-Walore-Prestigio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion  9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Dec 09, 2005 20:25 | #3 I have not done this comparison either. I guess the 1.4 on a 135 would get me so close to the 200 I see no reason to use this setup. I have, however, used the 1.4 on the 200 with excellent results. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| Permanent ban Thanks guys. I have used the 135L and 1.4x TC to my satifaction. Just wondering if it would pay to get the 200L as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
genewch Senior Member 360 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Hong Kong More info | Does the 1.4x TC slow down the focusing speed of 135mm and 200mm considerably? I'm keen to use them in (indoor) sports pics.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| Permanent ban genewch wrote: Does the 1.4x TC slow down the focusing speed of 135mm... considerably? no
LOG IN TO REPLY |
genewch Senior Member 360 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Hong Kong More info | Dec 11, 2005 03:45 | #7 So if the 1.4x extender doesn't slow down focusing speed much, I should be happy with the extender with half price of the 200mm. It sounds a good bargain! But, the bare 200mm is really cool! It operates like the 135mm, and saves the weight of the extender.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Dec 11, 2005 10:11 | #8 It does not slow down the focus speed on the 200, but like I said with the 200 in the bag I have never used the TC on the 135. Maybe I should just out of curiosity. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| Permanent ban rklepper wrote: ...I have never used the TC on the 135. Maybe I should just out of curiosity. If you do, Doc, could you let us know what you think?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2264 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
