Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Jun 2012 (Tuesday) 09:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wide angle lenses and extenders ...

 
pixel_junkie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jun 05, 2012 09:47 |  #1

Do any of you use your wider lenses with extenders? I always though extenders are for longer focal lengths but I recently saw in a video a photographer was using a 24TSE with an extender. Thought it was a great idea. Certainly much cheaper to go that route than to get a bunch closely FL spaced primes.


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5W0L3
Senior Member
998 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jun 05, 2012 09:52 |  #2

Doesn't using extenders mean you lose light?.. i.e. you cant use your primes @ their widest aperture?.. that to me would be one of the reasons why people don't use it on primes.


Manav
5D III x 2 (gripped) | 35L | 85L II | 100L | 24-70mm IIL | 70-200mm IIL | Some strobes & some speedlights.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jun 05, 2012 09:55 |  #3

Kenko 2x + 35L. The result?.... not great.

IMAGE: http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h163/newtheory/b579790b.jpg

IMAGE: http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h163/newtheory/f1d5f518.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jun 05, 2012 10:02 as a reply to  @ Cesium's post |  #4

^ I mean the tele extenders, like the 1.4X and 2X


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andyjensen
Member
82 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jun 07, 2012 05:10 |  #5

That's what Cesium did there. Extenders are meant for tele lenses where you need a fairly large jump in FL to make a big difference. At wider angles a relatively small change in FL is more noticeable. Going from, say, 35mm to 50mm (1.4x) or to 70mm (2x) is a decent jump. I think you're better served to have a pair (or set) of primes and keep the IQ, or just get a zoom.

Besides, Canon's extenders won't work on anything shorter than the 135L (with the exception of the 70-200 zooms), so you're left with third party extenders which are, well, generally not that great.

I can see this working in a niche use (eg with a TS lens as you mentioned) where it would be prohibitively expensive to get multiple FLs. Also, videographers sometimes do strange things. :p


Some clicking occurred, a few lenses were involved, that's about all I know ...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4507
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 07, 2012 17:32 |  #6

Folks have long used telextenders to alter the effective FL of optics that are ordinarily 'normal' optical designs, in addition to using them with long FL lenses known as 'telephoto'. In more recent years folks have resorted to using them with wide angle shift lenses, to make them 'less wide angle'. I don't know optically how unwise that last usage is, since I haven't seen objective measurements of what happens to MTF resolution at the center and at the edge of the frame, in doing so.

The thing to keep in mind is that telextenders are

  • primarily designed to work with optical designs known as 'telephoto', where the rear nodal distance < FL.
  • 'Normal' lenses have the nodal distance ≈ FL;
  • wide angle lenses for SLRs are typically 'retrofocus' designs which have nodal distance > FL in order to clear the reflex mirror.


The fact that Canon telextenders have a front element that protrudes in front of the location of the forward lens mount is an indirect clue about the fact that they are designed for the 'telephoto' lens that has room for that front element. The fact that the 17mm TSE has room for a Canon telextender as well, is simply an 'accident' of designing a lens that can shift in two directions without hitting the lens mount on the body.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Jun 07, 2012 17:37 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #7

I've tried my Kenko 2x extender on my Roki 35mm and got results similar to Cesium's. Sort of foggy. Almost like some moisture got in the way, even though none did.


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NewEnglandPhotographer
Goldmember
2,343 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jun 07, 2012 17:38 |  #8

a good rule I go by.. if the lens is white, it will accept a TC. If the lens is black, it won't. (canon only obviously)


Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 09, 2012 16:03 |  #9

They work beautifully on my TS-E 17L and TS-E 24L. Essentially, they give me a whole stack of extra primes that otherwise wouldn't exist.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimewall
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 09, 2012 18:05 |  #10

ewheeler20 wrote in post #14546784 (external link)
a good rule I go by.. if the lens is white, it will accept a TC. If the lens is black, it won't. (canon only obviously)


All whites and of current (black) lenses the 135L, 180mm macro, 200mm f2.8 L - I think. Is this correct?


Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
2,497 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Aug 2006
Location: West Tennessee, USA
     
Jun 09, 2012 18:16 |  #11

jimewall wrote in post #14556047 (external link)
All whites and of current (black) lenses the 135L, 180mm macro, 200mm f2.8 L - I think. Is this correct?

I don't believe the 70-300L will work with a Canon TC and it's white.


Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NewEnglandPhotographer
Goldmember
2,343 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jun 09, 2012 18:53 |  #12

crap.. ok my white vs black rule doesn't work, lol. How about this: All MY white lenses work with the TC. All MY black lenses dont. :)


Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Jun 09, 2012 23:53 |  #13

ewheeler20 wrote in post #14556193 (external link)
crap.. ok my white vs black rule doesn't work, lol. How about this: All MY white lenses work with the TC. All MY black lenses dont. :)

And again.. this is only with Canon TCs. I use my Sigma 1.4x TC all the time on my 100/2.8 USM macro(black and under 135mm), with excellent results. ;)


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4507
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 10, 2012 11:58 |  #14

pixel_junkie wrote in post #14534027 (external link)
Do any of you use your wider lenses with extenders? I always though extenders are for longer focal lengths but I recently saw in a video a photographer was using a 24TSE with an extender. Thought it was a great idea. Certainly much cheaper to go that route than to get a bunch closely FL spaced primes.

Back to the point that I made earlier, about teleconvertors being designed for use with 'telephoto' optical design lenses...
On Kenko's own website, they specifically point out that their teleconvertors,
"The PRO 300 family are designed specifically to be used with prime telephoto lenses of 100mm or above, such as 300 mm f/2.8 lenses, and work best with telephoto lenses of 200mm to 500mm. The PRO 300 can be used with telephoto zoom lenses as well as prime lenses. However, Kenko does not recommend them for zoom lenses that have a range starting under 50 mm."


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yeoer
Senior Member
Avatar
804 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: The sharp end of the UK.
     
Jun 10, 2012 15:28 |  #15

My Kenko pro 300 lets me use my Sigma 10-20 on my 5D2... work really quite well.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=909337


Canon 5D MarkII, 40D, 350D, EOS100, G10. Canon 24-105 F4 L, 85mm, 400mm F5.6, 50mm F1.8, 18-55mm, Sigma 10-20, 100-300mm, Canon 28-105 F3.5-F4.5, Kenko x1.4, Tubes and a bunch of Elinchrom Lights, flashes, reflectors and triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,467 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Wide angle lenses and extenders ...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
653 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.