Folks have long used telextenders to alter the effective FL of optics that are ordinarily 'normal' optical designs, in addition to using them with long FL lenses known as 'telephoto'. In more recent years folks have resorted to using them with wide angle shift lenses, to make them 'less wide angle'. I don't know optically how unwise that last usage is, since I haven't seen objective measurements of what happens to MTF resolution at the center and at the edge of the frame, in doing so.
The thing to keep in mind is that telextenders are
- primarily designed to work with optical designs known as 'telephoto', where the rear nodal distance < FL.
- 'Normal' lenses have the nodal distance ≈ FL;
- wide angle lenses for SLRs are typically 'retrofocus' designs which have nodal distance > FL in order to clear the reflex mirror.
The fact that Canon telextenders have a front element that protrudes in front of the location of the forward lens mount is an indirect clue about the fact that they are designed for the 'telephoto' lens that has room for that front element. The fact that the 17mm TSE has room for a Canon telextender as well, is simply an 'accident' of designing a lens that can shift in two directions without hitting the lens mount on the body.