Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 06 Jun 2012 (Wednesday) 06:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Tamron 17-50 2.8 or...

 
russ925
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jun 06, 2012 06:06 |  #1

I got a 430EXII for my birthday however wifey gave me the option to return it and go get a lens, Tamron 17-50 non -vc.

Question is do I keep the flash or go for the lens. Most of the pictures I take general, kids, vacations, car shows, etc. I have the 50 1.8 for portaits and the 55-250 for wildlife, aircraft photo's etc.

Thanks


T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
www.flickr.com/photos/​russ925/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 06, 2012 06:44 |  #2

russ925 wrote in post #14538521 (external link)
I got a 430EXII for my birthday however wifey gave me the option to return it and go get a lens, Tamron 17-50 non -vc.

Question is do I keep the flash or go for the lens. Most of the pictures I take general, kids, vacations, car shows, etc. I have the 50 1.8 for portaits and the 55-250 for wildlife, aircraft photo's etc.

Thanks

you gotta have a flash
keep it and buy the Tamron (or Sigma) later

Then you can combine them !

XSi (450D)
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non-vc
with Yongnuo ETTL Flash on camera
-2 FEC


IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7099/7330139528_ecc3e12f40_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amamba
Goldmember
Avatar
3,675 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Nov 2007
Location: SE MI
     
Jun 06, 2012 06:57 |  #3

Do you use flash at all ? If so, keep the flash, it would make more difference.

But as watt100 said, you really want both.


Ex-Canon shooter. Now Sony Nex.
Life Lessons: KISS. RTFM. Don't sweat the small stuff.
My Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ925
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jun 06, 2012 07:26 |  #4

OF course I REALLY want both.....just not in the cards.
I have an old Sunpak flash but we are comparing a Honda to Mercedes when talking about a speedlite.

Nothing againest Honda's...I have one:)


T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
www.flickr.com/photos/​russ925/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 06, 2012 08:52 |  #5

russ925 wrote in post #14538697 (external link)
OF course I REALLY want both.....just not in the cards.
I have an old Sunpak flash but we are comparing a Honda to Mercedes when talking about a speedlite.

Nothing againest Honda's...I have one:)


if the flash is not ETTL then the advice is still you can do more with an ETTL flash and your current lens than a new lens, especially for "general, kids, vacations" etc.
But I won't deny it, having a sharp F2.8 zoom comes in handy at times

XSi (450D)
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non-vc

F2.8
ISO 1600

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7244/7274049164_95a367eb92_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,758 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4996
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 06, 2012 10:06 |  #6

go for the lens for sure. Worst case scenario, you can use your popup flash.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
2,398 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cordova, TN
     
Jun 06, 2012 10:37 |  #7

Indoor pics of kids requires a flash, no matter how fast your lens. Keep the flash or trade it for a Yongnuo ETTL and you could have the lens and flash for less than $100 more than just the lens.


Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,758 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4996
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 06, 2012 11:42 |  #8

bob_r wrote in post #14539588 (external link)
Indoor pics of kids requires a flash, no matter how fast your lens. Keep the flash or trade it for a Yongnuo ETTL and you could have the lens and flash for less than $100 more than just the lens.

meh, I get by without flash all the time. You can get by with pretty dimly lit conditions, save the most extreme cases like a dimly lit restaurant.

settings like 1/50, ISO 1600, F2.8 can get you by in fairly low light conditions


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
2,398 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cordova, TN
     
Jun 06, 2012 12:10 |  #9

Charlie wrote in post #14539926 (external link)
meh, I get by without flash all the time. You can get by with pretty dimly lit conditions, save the most extreme cases like a dimly lit restaurant.

settings like 1/50, ISO 1600, F2.8 can get you by in fairly low light conditions

Not shooting kids, which is the first subject the OP mentioned.


Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,758 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4996
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 06, 2012 12:25 |  #10

bob_r wrote in post #14540070 (external link)
Not shooting kids, which is the first subject the OP mentioned.

I have three kids and shot with the 17-50 indoors for years. I still use a 2.8 lens and shoot indoors all the time. It's not like kids never settle down, they may seem like they're in motion all the time, but they do slow down.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,758 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4996
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 06, 2012 13:02 |  #11

indoors low light with 17-50

http://www.flickr.com …7345720320/in/p​hotostream (external link)
http://www.flickr.com …160511179/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)
http://www.flickr.com …160510547/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - SY 35/1.4 AF - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
2,398 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cordova, TN
     
Jun 06, 2012 17:18 |  #12

Your results could have been much better had you used a flash.


Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 06, 2012 18:19 |  #13

bob_r wrote in post #14541583 (external link)
Your results could have been much better had you used a flash.

Charlie wrote in post #14540353 (external link)
indoors low light with 17-50

http://www.flickr.com …7345720320/in/p​hotostream (external link)


much better?
not sure about that!
But it's true if you need a higher shutter speed then using a flash is a good thing




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,553 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tamron 17-50 2.8 or...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
815 guests, 375 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.