Can anyone give me a good reason to keep PSE 3.0 since I just updated to PSCS 2.0. So far from what I've seen, it has everything that PSE 3.0 has. Is there something I'm missing that is in PSE 3.0 that I would need that isn't in PSCS 2.0?
JABACo Member 236 posts Joined Sep 2003 More info | Dec 09, 2005 21:03 | #1 Can anyone give me a good reason to keep PSE 3.0 since I just updated to PSCS 2.0. So far from what I've seen, it has everything that PSE 3.0 has. Is there something I'm missing that is in PSE 3.0 that I would need that isn't in PSCS 2.0?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cecilc Senior Member 613 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Atlanta, Ga More info | Dec 09, 2005 21:13 | #2 JABACo wrote: Can anyone give me a good reason to keep PSE 3.0 since I just updated to PSCS 2.0. So far from what I've seen, it has everything that PSE 3.0 has. Is there something I'm missing that is in PSE 3.0 that I would need that isn't in PSCS 2.0? No Cecil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jjonsalt Goldmember 1,502 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Central Florida More info | Permanent bancecilc wrote: No I don't think I'd keep ANY version of Elements if I had the full version of PS .... Dito, and I didn't like Elements when I tried it, just didn't seem to flow right or something.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jjonsalt wrote: Dito, and I didn't like Elements when I tried it, just didn't seem to flow right or something. I agree with both of you. I was just making certain that I wasn't missing anything. I did like the red eye removal tool with PSE 3.0, but now, PSCS 2.0 has it along with most of what PSE could/would do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonFREAQ Hatchling 4 posts Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 10, 2005 02:51 | #5 no
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Dec 10, 2005 09:15 | #6 Give it to some kid who will appreciate it! FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Dec 10, 2005 09:28 | #7 If you're not going to give it to some kid like Frank suggested, then keep it installed on your computer. You never know when a newbie POTN member might ask a PSE3 question that you can answer but don't remember the exact details to without actually going through the process yourself in PSE3 or needing screen shots for. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Dec 10, 2005 09:44 | #8 Photoshop Elements is exactly that...it contains ELEMENTS of Photoshop. Therefore, PSCS2 (which I just got too, by the way) has everything PSE3 has. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KinkySmith Member 40 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Blue Mountains, Australia More info | Dec 10, 2005 21:23 | #9 Actually the healing tool and the red eye removal tool first appeared in elements before it appeared in cs, and this is usually the way adobe will do things: plugins and filters improvements will be added to cs first, but new tools will be added to elements first... its called a consistent turnover. I havent seen elements 4.0 yet but wouldnt be surprised if it has some features that wont be seen in the ful version till cs3.0. Imagine ive just said something terribly interesting. Hopefully witty and charming too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1749 guests, 148 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||