Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries 
Thread started 07 Jun 2012 (Thursday) 11:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wedding portfolio critique

 
robots4joey
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
     
Jun 07, 2012 11:08 |  #1

Hello everyone,

I am trying to put together my portfolio for weddings and I could use some input. These are basically all the best photos I have (always as a 2nd photographer) I want this to be enough to convince someone to book a wedding with me. (I am not a top of the line photographer, I charge about 1/3 of the middle-high average in my area- which is where I hope to be someday)

The webpage is not 'live' as the website needs a lot of work still, but I was hoping to get the portfolio critiqued, since it will be the first thing people go look at!

I am primarily interested in particular image comments, like: "#21 should not be in this portfolio", or "#5 could be cropped tighter"

Also, is it enough pictures? I have more, but I have to go through everything again to get the next best images... Also, I'd really like to scramble these so the weddings aren't in order, does anyone know how to do this besides manual renaming?

http://www.marshallpho​tographyks.com/proofs/​weddings/ (external link)

Thanks so much, I can really use the help!

-Joe


Website for Weddings: Wichita Wedding Photographer (external link)
Our Silly Photo Booth: Photo Booth Wichita KS (external link)
5DmkIII | 60D | 70-200mm f2.8 IS-2 | 50mm 1.4 | 85mm 1.8 | 3x-580EX | Radiopoppers | @ weddings I rent the works!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JasonMK
Goldmember
Avatar
1,377 posts
Gallery: 75 photos
Likes: 155
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Albany, NY
     
Jun 07, 2012 13:29 |  #2

I'm not a wedding photographer, but my first reaction to seeing some of the thumbnails is that they get cropped oddly. For example, almost all of the heads are cropped/chopped off on the bottom pictures. Can you use portrait thumbnails for your portrait shots and landscape thumbnails for your landscape shots (or just pick one or the other).


-JasonMK on Flickr (external link)
1Ds Mark III | 650D | EF 17~40mm 4L | EF-S 18~135 STM | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro | Tamron 70~300mm 4.0-5.6 Di VC USD XLD | 430 EX III | 430 EX II | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | EF 25 II | PS CC | LR CC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robots4joey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
     
Jun 07, 2012 14:01 |  #3

That's an easy fix! Thanks Jason. I'll do that right away!


Website for Weddings: Wichita Wedding Photographer (external link)
Our Silly Photo Booth: Photo Booth Wichita KS (external link)
5DmkIII | 60D | 70-200mm f2.8 IS-2 | 50mm 1.4 | 85mm 1.8 | 3x-580EX | Radiopoppers | @ weddings I rent the works!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robots4joey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
     
Jun 07, 2012 19:22 |  #4

I changed the thumbnails, they do look better now, I also made them a little bigger on the page.

Any other advice anyone?


Website for Weddings: Wichita Wedding Photographer (external link)
Our Silly Photo Booth: Photo Booth Wichita KS (external link)
5DmkIII | 60D | 70-200mm f2.8 IS-2 | 50mm 1.4 | 85mm 1.8 | 3x-580EX | Radiopoppers | @ weddings I rent the works!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ of ­ Cornubia
Senior Member
459 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Oztralia
     
Jun 07, 2012 19:26 as a reply to  @ robots4joey's post |  #5

I think many of your shots would have been better with a much shallower DOF, to pull the subject away from the background, and some would benefit from a vignette or perhaps burning the background, again to emphasise the subject.

Generally speaking though, they're OK, with a couple of standouts.


5D MK3, 7D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 16-35mm f/2.8L, EF 1.4x TC MKIII, Nissin Di866 II, Nissin Di466
I hate being bipolar. It's great.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robots4joey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
     
Jun 08, 2012 09:02 |  #6

Thanks Steve,

I agree that I definitely can work on shooting with a smaller DOF. I'm always so worried that I will have the person in the front in focus and the person behind out... so I am very conservative with my aperture.

Do you think I need more than 33 photos? At what point does it become too many?


Website for Weddings: Wichita Wedding Photographer (external link)
Our Silly Photo Booth: Photo Booth Wichita KS (external link)
5DmkIII | 60D | 70-200mm f2.8 IS-2 | 50mm 1.4 | 85mm 1.8 | 3x-580EX | Radiopoppers | @ weddings I rent the works!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orena
Senior Member
544 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: eilat, israel/ chicago
     
Jun 08, 2012 09:10 |  #7

i didn't look through much, but i would def say shoot with more shallow DOF. another thing i noticed was the lighting, a lot of the pictures looked a bit underexposed on my screen.

to keep things in focus you can play with having your focus button on the back, i don't know which 5dii model you have and i'm far from a canon expert but you can always set to a back button focus then focus and recompose without losing your focus points, you'll need a quick eye and a quick lens but it can really help a lot.


Always do right, this will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
5DIII-7D-70-200L 2.8IS II-24-70 2.8 II L -50 1.4--28 135(4 SALE)-580exii-430ex -
http://www.orenaphoto.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Jun 08, 2012 17:30 |  #8

The portfolio is not consistent throughout in terms of quality. I'd argue you need to lose about half of these images including the last two certainly. Image 32, for example, probably should not have been given back to the client and certainly doesn't warrant being in your portfolio.

There are a couple of images (e.g. image 12) that were exposed fabulously--ONLY if you had popped off a flash to fill the foreground. Short of that they read as just underexposed shots that had potential.

My overall suggestion: reduce to about 15-20 images and upon request by a prospective client to see more images, show your best 80 or so of your best (probably most recent) wedding.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FerozeK
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2012
Location: JHB, South Africa
     
Jun 08, 2012 17:48 |  #9

You have 2 shots with the wine glass and the cake behind it, loose one.

No 2, doesn't look initmate enough, they too far apart and the shadows behind are not nice

No 8, some dodge and burn would really draw the eye into the focal point

I like No 27

You got a few first dance/kiss shots, pick you best 2-3

Add some formal male portraits, like groom and best men and maybe a closer one of the putting the ring on the finger.

If you were the 2nd shooter is the main shooter aware you using these pics and are they fine with it. I know many guys who wont let the 2nd shooter use the pics in his portfolio, I've shot some really good stuff in the past which is now sitting on the primary guys site / portfolio and there's nothing I can do....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,736 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Wedding portfolio critique
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1698 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.