Had this linked in another thread, but it will get burried quickly.
Shoot at your highest iso setting and compare the noise to these shots.
The difference is an incredible leap up from the digic 4 crop bodies. 75% less noise.
Martzart Senior Member  252 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2012 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Jun 08, 2012 04:03 | #1 Had this linked in another thread, but it will get burried quickly. Deviant Art ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrJulius Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jun 08, 2012 04:20 | #2 Can't belive it if it's true in real life
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The new DIGIC 5 is suppose to produce alot less noise.... however those are studio shots. I want to see some ISO 12800 and 25600 shots at F2.8 in real world use. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Jun 08, 2012 15:37 | #5 Talley wrote in post #14549466 The new DIGIC 5 is suppose to produce alot less noise.... however those are studio shots. I want to see some ISO 12800 and 25600 shots at F2.8 in real world use. Yeah. But I'm sure the DIGIC 5 will improve ISO performance regardless. A huge amount? I don't know, but even a full stop plus some would be pretty cool and bode well for future crop sensors. I can only dream that it makes all of the next croppers jump in ISO performance like the 5d3 My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stone13 Goldmember  1,690 posts Likes: 8 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Huntersville, NC More info | Jun 08, 2012 15:43 | #6 I assume these are jpegs and Canon has already proven they have a great jpg engine in the digic V. I wonder how the raw files will stack up, it appears Canon did the same kind of overhaul to the 18MP sensor that they did on the 5DIII sensor. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheFarmer Senior Member  267 posts Joined May 2012 Location: On a farm More info | Jun 08, 2012 15:53 | #7 Looks fantastic! 5DM3 | 35mm F2 | Sigma 50mm 1.4 | 24-105 F4L | Canon GP-E2 GPS | Canon ST-E3-RT | 2x 600EX-RT | The End
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 08, 2012 16:08 | #8 Looks like Canon's latest *.jpg voodoo magic. Same "magic" supposedly applied to the 5D3 and 1DX jpgs as well to claim a 2-stop improvement over previous generation. Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2012 17:00 | #9 jwcdds wrote in post #14551861 Looks like Canon's latest *.jpg voodoo magic. Same "magic" supposedly applied to the 5D3 and 1DX jpgs as well to claim a 2-stop improvement over previous generation. Then ultimately, it's revealed that RAW is maybe... MAYBE 1/2 stop better. This. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kaigler Senior Member  500 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Well that's particularly good for Rebel shooters. I would say a large portion of those shoot exclusively .jpg and don't even know what RAW file is. Canon 5D Mk III - Canon 24-105 f/4 L IS, Sigma 85 f/1.4, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS, Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2012 17:14 | #11 I've got the Digic 5 processor in my Canon S100, and the noise reduction is quite good, but at a cost of detail. _
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ljason8eg Senior Member 478 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Elk Grove, California More info | Jun 08, 2012 17:27 | #12 Kaigler wrote in post #14552096 Well that's particularly good for Rebel shooters. I would say a large portion of those shoot exclusively .jpg and don't even know what RAW file is. This. A good portion of these cameras sit in green box mode their whole lives with the advanced settings never being touched. Jason
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuturamaJSP Goldmember  2,227 posts Likes: 82 Joined Oct 2009 More info | Jun 08, 2012 20:51 | #13 I am sure most people in here shoot RAW so those jpg comparisons are pointless They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gotak Senior Member 949 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Jun 08, 2012 21:30 | #14 Noise is one thing detail is another. Not that those test shots were that bad for details but in general those preview test shots of late from dpreview have not been the best at figuring out what the real situation is for the noise vs details situation. So I wouldn't get that excited yet. http://bubble-trees.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2798 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
