Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Jun 2012 (Saturday) 05:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Red River Paper Quick Impressions Pitted Against Ilford Pearl

 
BigBadWolfie
Senior Member
268 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jun 09, 2012 05:33 |  #1

I have a Canon Pro9500 and I ordered the Red River Paper sample pack. Using my rotatrim trimmer I have cut the pages to 4x6 size to compare to the Ilford Pearl I have at that size. I have printed out color prints from the same photo to make the comparison easy. Here are some quick impressions and comments.

Profiles: I have my monitor calibrated and profiled. I also downloaded printer profiles from each manufacturer and used the corresponding profiles when making the print. What I found was that the Red River Papers share a similar look that compared to the Ilford Pearl appears to be more saturated

Ilford Pearl: Using LR4 softproof + Similute Paper & Ink, I was able to get the most accurate screen to print match with the Ilford Pearl. However, I found it very difficult to get the vibrancy and contrast I want out of the Ilford Pearl. As a result, the colors were a little bit muted in comparison to the Red River renditions (RR Matte aside). With that said, the Ilford Pearl supposedly doesn't contain any OBAs so there's no telling whether the Red River paper will eventually or quickly fade making the fresh off the print comparisons mute.

Polar Metallic: Really like the unique look but I'm not sure if that's a look I want to go with. I'm probably just not used to looking at a metallic print so it looks a bit odd. I printed a picture with a sky without much detail. The metallic print turned the sky into metal looking. The bigger problem is that it's so easy for it to show scratch marks or even finger print impressions. I checked out the unused paper that is still sitting in my box and notice that it is not perfect. I suspect that it would be mighty difficult to come out with a flawless print with this printer and have it transferred to an album or frame without you leaving a mark on it.

Polar Lustre: It's the most "Pearlescent" of the papers. For some reason, despite it being "Polar" it is not as white as the Polar Satin but it's also not as as yellow as the UltraPro Satin. Colors are clearly more vibrant with the Lustre than with the Satins.

UltraPro Satin and Polar Satin: These two are VERY close with the Polar Satin sometimes being too white in the sense that white almost looks blue. Whereas the UltraPro sometimes looks too yellow. In terms of being Pearlescent, Polar Satin is a bit more Pearlescent. I consider the UltraPro Satin to be the closest to Ilford Pearl with less "Pearlescence". Given the prices, I think I'll go with either the UltraPro Satin or the Lustre.

Polar Glossy: I expected a vibrant print but it's not as vibrant as lustre. Perhaps things would be different on a dye based printer, but on the Canon Pro9500, it actually doesn't that glossy. It actually looks similar to the Polar Metallic without the metallic look.

Polar Matte: I actually really like the matte, although I usually lean more towards the glossy. It's cleary a matte print so the colors are less vibrant. Still, I think it's a really nice looking matte paper.

That's the extent of my impressions. I also ordered a Hahnemuhle sample pack that I intend to make comparison with, but I'm not sure which would be a fair comparison given the sample pack is fine art paper based.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,389 views & 0 likes for this thread
Red River Paper Quick Impressions Pitted Against Ilford Pearl
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ArleeZarling
572 guests, 206 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.