Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 09 Jun 2012 (Saturday) 11:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for some advice - Interfit studio vs flashes

 
John_N
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Jun 09, 2012 11:55 |  #1

Hi,

I am a strict amateur and currently own the interfit three head kit (external link) and it really is a good kit, however I don't have a studio or spare room, on top of that I have two small kids who I worry would knock the lights down if I left them up (they haven't yet but then I've very careful with all my kit).

So given that the set up time (gathering up the stuff, clearing space, assembling etc etc) is my major stumbling block would I be better of with normal flashes?

If so what would you suggest - I currently have a Nissin Di866 MkII and a Yonguno flash (I forget the model) and but they don't seem to play that well together - I also have a Yunguno RC-602 to trigger them.

Thanks.



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:01 |  #2

IMHO not really. They still take up the same space when assembled. If you get a portable power supply for your monolights, like a VML from PCB, it would open up a number of uses. All you gain by downsizing is a smaller flashhead and less power.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shankarhokie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,894 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Saline, Michigan
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:03 |  #3

There are many here that shoot exclusively with speedlights and do an awesome job. As for what model speedlights, guess it depends on your budget & how you want to control the lights.

People get the 580ExIi, because it is powerful and versatile. It can be controlled by the camera (on models that have this feature) and can control most other Canon flashes, so that you get the full ETTL capability off camera.

If you want to use them off camera in manual mode, then the options are plenty. Then even the Yongnuo brands will work great with some radio triggers.

I am sure the experts will chime in and offer more advice.


Shankar
Perpetual learner.
FLICKR (external link) -- Gear-- Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:11 |  #4

Thanks for the feedback so far.

If I recall the Nissin Di866 II is comparable with the Canon 580 EX II power and feature wise, so I would be part way there, I guess were it a valid option I could look to their Di622 II as a slave unit(s).



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:14 |  #5

gonzogolf wrote in post #14554950 (external link)
IMHO not really. They still take up the same space when assembled. If you get a portable power supply for your monolights, like a VML from PCB, it would open up a number of uses. All you gain by downsizing is a smaller flashhead and less power.

I agree, I don't see the time or space saving here. It takes almost as long to set up flashguns on stands, and fit softboxes or other modifiers, as it does studio units. Likewise a flashgun on a stand with a decent sized softbox, is about the same size as the interfit unit too.

Given that the set-up time and the space seemed to be your main gripe, I don't see what you would gain, and you would lose modelling lights (which are a big plus in my mind as you can see how your lighting is falling on the subject, which you can't with flashguns). In addition, you already have this kit and buying flashguns will cost you more money unless you sell the interfits to pay for them. Of course, if you do that then feel that you preferred them, you are out of pocket anyway if you then sell the flashguns and buy another interfit outfit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:23 |  #6

I would be selling the kit if I went that way - the thing is I don;t get the use out of them but would still want to be able to do it when the urge arises.

I already have a trigger, a decent flash (and a cheapie one too) - I agree with the modelling light part, however a few flashes would be more mobile and compact (ie I could use them in more places as they're much smaller so would be better for high speed work such as water drops etc), also I could use them in the garden, in a field, on the moon ;) Agreed I could get a PSU, but I really am an amateur dabbler despite having some decent kit.

In short I see advantages and so far one disadvantage.



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:37 |  #7

John_N wrote in post #14555051 (external link)
a few flashes would be more mobile and compact (ie I could use them in more places as they're much smaller so would be better for high speed work such as water drops etc), also I could use them in the garden, in a field, on the moon ;)

I agree for those uses, where you aren't going to need the big modifiers, flashguns are going to be quicker and simpler.

I have four studio strobes and am considering adding another couple of regular flashguns to my outfit for such uses as you mention there, when I don't want to use the big strobes. However, I have too many situations where I want the modelling lights and the big softboxes, beauty dishes etc. to allow me to sell my "proper" lighting.

Sadly, I don't have an "either / or" dilemma, I want both and that hurts the wallet. :cry:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:49 |  #8

So from that am I right in thinking that flashes are very restricted when it comes to messing with the light?

Its funny I was just chatting with my wife and I said that I don't get much use out of them, but she pointed out "yeah, but you're a perfectionist", sadly she's semi right I am - to a point, that point being they I cannot focus long enough to actually get good at any discipline. Anyway thats all a little left of field and off topic.

Part off the issue is that I tend to want to do things quickly - so when I do mess with the studio kit it really does take a bit of time, whereas I could see me grabbing a couple of stands, clipping on flashes, pop in an umbrella and chuck up a pop up background much more often.... but.... I would still hope to get decent results.



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:58 |  #9

John_N wrote in post #14555151 (external link)
So from that am I right in thinking that flashes are very restricted when it comes to messing with the light?

I wouldn't say "very" restricted. You can get a range of modifiers for them, just as you can with studio lights. Interfit do a range called "strobies" and include all sorts of modifiers, including barn doors, snoots, dishes etc. They do a softbox too, but it is piddling small, although normal size umbrellas are available. They come in two separate kit sets and some are available individually. If you look around you should be able to find a good sized softbox from another manufacturer.

Of course, getting is one thing and using is another. Without modelling lights setting up such things as snoots, honeycombs and barn doors etc., becomes a serious case of trial and error to get them positioned correctly, and if your subject moves a little you don't notice how the light is now missing them, or hitting them wrongly.

So, it can be trickier to mess around with the light (depending on which modifiers you wish to use) but not necessarily too restricted as a good range of modifiers are available.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_holtmeier
Goldmember
Avatar
2,213 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 3012
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:58 |  #10

I'll chime in to say that ever since I got a Vagabond Mini, shooting outdoors is much easier. Amount of power and recycle are no longer something to worry about.



https://www.facebook.c​om/FotonFoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_N
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,182 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mansfield, UK
     
Jun 09, 2012 13:59 |  #11

Hmn... just watched this - http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=p3JG3IONAYw (external link) and it confirms what you are all saying, but the convenience aspect still bothers me.



flickr (external link) (magsnorton)
: Google+ (external link) : My Site (external link) : 5oopx (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 09, 2012 14:56 |  #12

John_N wrote in post #14555151 (external link)
So from that am I right in thinking that flashes are very restricted when it comes to messing with the light?

Its funny I was just chatting with my wife and I said that I don't get much use out of them, but she pointed out "yeah, but you're a perfectionist", sadly she's semi right I am - to a point, that point being they I cannot focus long enough to actually get good at any discipline. Anyway thats all a little left of field and off topic.

Part off the issue is that I tend to want to do things quickly - so when I do mess with the studio kit it really does take a bit of time, whereas I could see me grabbing a couple of stands, clipping on flashes, pop in an umbrella and chuck up a pop up background much more often.... but.... I would still hope to get decent results.

Honestly its the same process. The only real difference is the size of the flash. A monolight is as easy to pop on a stand as a strobe, even easier if you consider the bracket. The flashes are a tiny bit more portable, but if you have to carry a couple of stands, umbrellas and such its not that much hassle to carry the small monolights. The ability to fill a large modifier and still have enough power to do what you want trumps that in my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,049 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Looking for some advice - Interfit studio vs flashes
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1455 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.