Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 10 Jun 2012 (Sunday) 14:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Low budget venues - lighting questions

 
oceanbeast
Senior Member
494 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jun 10, 2012 14:28 |  #1

I will be shooting my first wedding next month and luckily the couple has a fantastic locale booked so all i have to worry about is my own job.

however i am dreading receiving a call from a client who has booked at one of those really cheap banquet halls or just a very ugly venue with horrible lighting and odd colored walls.

what are some of the techniques you use to make the images at these crappy venues look good? shallow DOF? creative processing?

im talking about this kind of ugly:
http://bios.weddingbee​.com/pics/117544/IMG_1​338.JPG (external link)
http://prettydaydream.​files.wordpress.com …ttany-wakefield-table.jpg (external link)

do you just not take the job? since i am just starting out in this field i feel like i may have to take these and do the best i can.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
etaf
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Wittering , West Sussex
     
Jun 10, 2012 14:49 |  #2

I will be shooting my first wedding next month and luckily the couple has a fantastic locale booked so all i have to worry about is my own job

the worst I had was a registry office all dark oak panelled and pouring with rain outside.
and days of film, so just had to hope and use as much light as we could - had the group shot up the stairs all worked out ok - I always used a tripod - so that helped a little bit too

often I would try and get to know the venues before hand and take a look before they event, the owners/managers where always fine for that

with film i would have 100 and also 400asa available - with the ISO available today and being able to look at the shots - you can at least check the shots as you go


60D | EF-S 18-200 | 50mm 2.5 macro | 550EX | Pro1 | Elements

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oceanbeast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
494 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jun 10, 2012 18:57 |  #3

my theory is to overpower any ambient and shoot at high apertures for shallow DOF with tight crops to eliminate any random crap in the Bg




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Jun 10, 2012 19:33 |  #4

Ooh.... Bingo hall ugly...

Take over (aka overpower) the light with strobes/flash


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 10, 2012 21:01 |  #5

They chose the venue, you have to show it well, not make it look like a million dollars. You get more challenging situations when you're new, it actually gets easier as you get better, nicer venues, better looking people, etc.

Use my standard off camera lighting suggestions.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brokensocial
Senior Member
481 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Jun 11, 2012 00:53 |  #6

No matter the situation, we either work with natural light for as long as possible or flash if we're forced up to or past ISO 6400. Personally, I don't like shooting tight; I prefer context, but if I don't like the background, I just get closer to the subject.


[mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
chicago wedding photography (external link) | chicago wedding photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 11, 2012 02:13 |  #7

I can always create better light than exists wherever I happen to be shooting, whether at high noon or the dead of night, indoors or outdoors.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jun 11, 2012 09:45 |  #8

Overpower the venue lighting. " like Tim said" Shoot tight shots and try some gels.

If you have no portfolio, this is a start.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rincon
Member
240 posts
Likes: 461
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Jun 11, 2012 12:26 |  #9

Off camera flash, shallow DOF and tight shots.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnThomas
Senior Member
Avatar
401 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Long Island, New York
     
Jun 11, 2012 12:28 |  #10

tim wrote in post #14560519 (external link)
They chose the venue, you have to show it well, not make it look like a million dollars. You get more challenging situations when you're new, it actually gets easier as you get better, nicer venues, better looking people, etc.

Use my standard off camera lighting suggestions.

scorpio_e wrote in post #14562489 (external link)
Overpower the venue lighting. " like Tim said" Shoot tight shots and try some gels.

If you have no portfolio, this is a start.

These are good points to follow. As I'm starting with wedding photography myself, I can only book the "budget" weddings being held in venues that look like the ones linked to above. I shoot tight and use flash to overpower ambient.


You can call me JT
jsantiniphotography.co​m

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jun 11, 2012 14:43 |  #11

Good luck JT. Post some images when you shoot the wedding.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 11, 2012 15:08 |  #12

I never use gels at weddings.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnThomas
Senior Member
Avatar
401 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Long Island, New York
     
Jun 11, 2012 15:11 |  #13

scorpio_e wrote in post #14564119 (external link)
Good luck JT. Post some images when you shoot the wedding.

Thanks man - It's in July, but I'll be sure to post about it.


You can call me JT
jsantiniphotography.co​m

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
215-photography
Member
209 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jun 11, 2012 20:15 as a reply to  @ JohnThomas's post |  #14

My first 4 weddings were shot for free. Clients knew I was building a portfolio and anyone that hires a "free photographer" is most likely on a tight budget. These are from my very first wedding, got into the business on a whim but I shot this with a T2i, 1-580EX II (on camera and bounced), 24-70L. Venue was probably worse then the first link you posted, it was a church that hasn't been touched since the 70's (also for free for the couple). You have to work with the venue and keep an open mind. Please disregard the sepia tones....... I thought it was a good idea at the time lol. You can still shoot tight and tell the story.

1.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


2.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


3.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

5D mark III x2, 5D mark II, 35 Sigma F1.4, 50L, 85L, 16-35L II, 24-70L II, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 f/2.8 macro, and not enough lights.
Two Fifteen Photography (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
215-photography
Member
209 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jun 11, 2012 20:18 as a reply to  @ 215-photography's post |  #15

Now if I had to do it all over again I would follow Tim's lighting post, typically my current set up. 2 OFC flashes and one on camera to over power ambient unless natural light is spectacular. But you can make anything work for you.


5D mark III x2, 5D mark II, 35 Sigma F1.4, 50L, 85L, 16-35L II, 24-70L II, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 f/2.8 macro, and not enough lights.
Two Fifteen Photography (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,829 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Low budget venues - lighting questions
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1096 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.