hi all , one of my first expirements with multi-exposure shots , i used three exposures for this shot , also i tried to reduce the distortion in photoshop cause i was using sigma 10-20 at 10mm , and this is what i got :
ShoaybHesham Member 121 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2010 More info | Jun 10, 2012 16:46 | #1 hi all , one of my first expirements with multi-exposure shots , i used three exposures for this shot , also i tried to reduce the distortion in photoshop cause i was using sigma 10-20 at 10mm , and this is what i got :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EGutierrez91 Member 48 posts Joined Feb 2012 More info | Jun 10, 2012 16:47 | #2 Seems to lose some sharpness/clarity at the top of the image but it looks awesome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stanclark Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Windsor,California More info | Jun 10, 2012 16:54 | #3 tower is little bright at the top....tower looks like it is leaning So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You should heed the image size rules... The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 10, 2012 19:30 | #5 Impressive indeed. Nice job of stitching. It looks like some haloing at the top though. And as Stanclark mentioned, seems tilted a bit to the right. Fix that tilt and it is wall-worthy! -- Image Editing OK --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stanclark Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Windsor,California More info | Jun 10, 2012 22:02 | #6 the building on the right side are leaning towards the tower.... your shots might not be level before you combined them.... So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2012 03:16 | #7 Now I'm wondering how he combined them. I thought he did vertical stacking and the inward tilt is wide-angle distortion on the bottom frame. -- Image Editing OK --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2012 06:51 | #8 thanks all for your comments , actually i didnt mean 3 shots as panorama , what i did is one shot but with three different exposures and then blended them together to get rid of the over exposed or underexposed areas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2012 06:54 | #9 EGutierrez91 wrote in post #14559659 Seems to lose some sharpness/clarity at the top of the image but it looks awesome. yes , i just noticed that , i think it the result from editing the vertical perspective
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2012 07:36 | #10 This kind of shot is where a tilt/shift lens really shows its stuff. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 521 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||