The following picture is made of two exposures (a technique called "double exposure" in 35mm film world) - one is sharp and the other is completely out of focus, combined in Photoshop :
Olegis Goldmember  2,073 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Israel More info | Dec 10, 2005 14:44 | #1 The following picture is made of two exposures (a technique called "double exposure" in 35mm film world) - one is sharp and the other is completely out of focus, combined in Photoshop : Best wishes,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
countzero Member 41 posts Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 10, 2005 15:11 | #2 Looks good. And interesting. Is this a rose? www.interpolated.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mwinog2777 Senior Member 294 posts Joined Oct 2001 More info | Dec 10, 2005 15:20 | #3 Picture has no central area of interest; nothing brings one to center. Too diffuse. Out of focus, yes, but becomes amorphous blur.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
count zero wrote: Looks good. And interesting. Is this a rose? Would you mind to post the originals? Yes, it is a rose
Best wishes,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bikerider Goldmember  3,909 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Woy Woy, NSW, Australia More info | I like your image, for me the interest is in contrast between the light and dark areas and also the uneven lines of the rose petals, a very calm image. I have seen some very fine shots of combined images years ago, where one shot is sharp and the other just slightly off focus. The result was very similar to diffuse glow in PS, a good tecnique to boost contrast. Eos 6D Mk1, 300D & G7x modified for Infrared, 17-40f4L, 70-200f4L, 100-400 f5.6 ISL, 15mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, various Lensbaby lenses, a few tripods, flash, GoPro 7 black.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
From what I experienced, no PS technique can match the "real thing", the real out of focus picture that is. On the other hand, maybe I'm not that familiar with PS after all Best wishes,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dewmuw Cream of the Crop  6,024 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2002 Location: Wirral, UK More info | Dec 12, 2005 10:32 | #7 If you stand it up in portrait mode it looks even better. How do I know - I turned my laptop on its side.!!!! Damian Waters
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nasriaz Member  103 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: The Woodlands, TX More info | I'f you are showing off your photoshop masters then it's pretty good, besides that the picture looks like radioactive jello. 5D | 300D | 24-105l | 85 1.8 | Tamron 28-75 | 50 1.8 | Sigma Super Flash |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wu_wei0 Irrepressibly irresistibly Creamy  12,250 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: You cannot know my location if you are busy measuring my speed More info | dewmuw wrote: If you stand it up in portrait mode it looks even better. How do I know - I turned my laptop on its side.!!!! ROFL!! Tried your trick, dewmuw-- and I agree! Always attracted to abstracts in these colors for some reason, so I rather liked the image already. Like it much better Portrait.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nasriaz wrote: I'f you are showing off your photoshop masters then it's pretty good, besides that the picture looks like radioactive jello. I already explained that the only post processing involved was combining the two exposures into one file, much like the double exposure in the analog photography domain. Best wishes,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1092 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
