Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Jun 2012 (Tuesday) 21:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PLEASE bring back eye-control AF!

 
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 11, 2013 06:58 |  #391

rrblint wrote in post #15473560 (external link)
Good find with the EOS 1 for $60...Try an A2E or one of the Elan models for ECF(make sure that it has the letter "E" in it's name). Don't know what they're going for now but they will be much cheaper than the EOS 3.

IIRC, my A2e was just over $100 with a couple of (crappy) lenses, an old flash and a bag to carry it all in. Even though it was old, it all worked fine, though I sold the lenses off and use my current ones with the A2e.


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Jan 11, 2013 08:38 |  #392

archer1960 wrote in post #15474197 (external link)
IIRC, my A2e was just over $100 with a couple of (crappy) lenses, an old flash and a bag to carry it all in. Even though it was old, it all worked fine, though I sold the lenses off and use my current ones with the A2e.

You can pick up the elan IIe all day long on amazon, ebay, etc for $25-$30. Only 3 AF points but I always liked the partial aluminum finish.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 11, 2013 08:55 |  #393

archer1960 wrote in post #15474197 (external link)
IIRC, my A2e was just over $100 with a couple of (crappy) lenses, an old flash and a bag to carry it all in. Even though it was old, it all worked fine, though I sold the lenses off and use my current ones with the A2e.

W:shock:W...I'll sell you my A2E for $100!:lol:


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:37 |  #394

rrblint wrote in post #15474538 (external link)
W:shock:W...I'll sell you my A2E for $100!:lol:

Didn't the A2E have some weird thing about the meter in the US that drove people to want the imported models? I seem to recall this when I was camera shopping in the early 90s and the guy at the shop recommended against the US version of this camera.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jblaschke
Goldmember
Avatar
1,445 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 27
Joined Apr 2008
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:45 |  #395

rrblint wrote in post #15473560 (external link)
Don't know what they're going for now but they will be much cheaper than the EOS 3.

I went with the Elan 7ne because it was essentially the last ECF body produced with the latest version of the feature, and was also equipped with ETTL-II. I got mine--a "Bargain" body plus grip--from KEH for roughly $120. As is often reported, KEH grades their equipment very harshly. What they classify as "Bargain" I'd have described as "Very Good" condition. My 7ne had a few minor scuffs, but honestly, my 7D looked far work after just a week of shooting!


Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
Model Mayhem (external link) | DeviantArt (external link) | Lisa On Location: New Braunfels Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 11, 2013 10:20 |  #396

rrblint wrote in post #15474538 (external link)
W:shock:W...I'll sell you my A2E for $100!:lol:

Full kit including flash and a couple of decent lenses (or one good one that doesn't duplicate what I already have)? Sure. Not the body alone, though...


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 11, 2013 12:00 |  #397

kfreels wrote in post #15474698 (external link)
Didn't the A2E have some weird thing about the meter in the US that drove people to want the imported models? I seem to recall this when I was camera shopping in the early 90s and the guy at the shop recommended against the US version of this camera.

I don't remember hearing or reading anything about this, but that doesn't mean it wasn't there. Perhaps there was something different about the early models, but I bought the A2E in '96 which was late in it's marketing lifetime. By that time everything that I read about it seemed to indicate that A2E=EOS 5.

I do remember reading that the A2(non E) version was marketed only in North America(though I'm sure that it showed up elsewhere in the gray market arena) and some people called it unofficially the EOS 5.5. Anders would know for sure, maybe he'll check in and give us the scoop.:)


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 11, 2013 12:07 |  #398

jblaschke wrote in post #15474720 (external link)
I went with the Elan 7ne because it was essentially the last ECF body produced with the latest version of the feature, and was also equipped with ETTL-II. I got mine--a "Bargain" body plus grip--from KEH for roughly $120. As is often reported, KEH grades their equipment very harshly. What they classify as "Bargain" I'd have described as "Very Good" condition. My 7ne had a few minor scuffs, but honestly, my 7D looked far work after just a week of shooting!

Yes, you definitely got a good deal there, with the grip. I don't remember if the 7NE was also capable of ATTL program flash, the EOS 3 could do both, but for film, I actually preferred ATTL to ETTL. If you have or can get an EZ flash, give ATTL a try. I think that you will like it.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 11, 2013 12:12 |  #399

archer1960 wrote in post #15474850 (external link)
Full kit including flash and a couple of decent lenses (or one good one that doesn't duplicate what I already have)? Sure. Not the body alone, though...

I was just kidding( I guess the lol smiley was misleading)...You got a good deal, especially if the flash is an EZ model...Is it?

If so give ATTL a try, it is a great TTL-OTF program for film.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,261 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jan 11, 2013 12:43 |  #400

Didn't the A2E have some weird thing about the meter in the US that drove people to want the imported models?

From Wiki and likely what kfreels is referring to..."At the time of the camera's production, there was a U.S. patent on the use of a digital scale to show under- or over-exposure in a metered-manual SLR. Canon did not want to pay the patent holder, and therefore omitted the -2/+2 (in half-stops) scale in the A2/A2e, leaving just an over or under indication. The European/Japanese market EOS 5 had the scale and on account of this many American photographers preferred the imported model. This is a firmware difference only, and there is at least one third-party firm which will install EOS 5 firmware on an A2/A2e, thereby adding this scale.'

We should also not forget another feature unique to those cameras, that of the shiftable DEP mode.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 11, 2013 16:27 as a reply to  @ John from PA's post |  #401

My A2E has the + or - 2 stop scale John, so I guess that must have been cleared up by 1996.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryan00013
Member
63 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Tulsa, OK
     
Jan 11, 2013 16:32 |  #402

I never even knew it existed but... now I REALLY REALLY want eye-controlled AF.


Gear list & feedback
harveyryanphotography.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Jan 11, 2013 16:33 |  #403

rrblint wrote in post #15476293 (external link)
My A2E has the + or - 2 stop scale John, so I guess that must have been cleared up by 1996.

That must be it but it sure seems weird. Didn't all of the other cameras have the scale? I really don't remember a lot from the time but my Elan had it. I wonder if somewhere between 91 and 95 they decided that they just needed to bite the bullet and pay.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 12, 2013 11:26 |  #404

rrblint wrote in post #15475268 (external link)
I was just kidding( I guess the lol smiley was misleading)...You got a good deal, especially if the flash is an EZ model...Is it?

If so give ATTL a try, it is a great TTL-OTF program for film.

Yes, it's a 300EZ. I'll have to look up those abbreviations; none of them look familiar (I know what TTL means, but am not sure how it is modified by the other stuff).


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 12, 2013 12:18 |  #405

archer1960 wrote in post #15478998 (external link)
Yes, it's a 300EZ. I'll have to look up those abbreviations; none of them look familiar (I know what TTL means, but am not sure how it is modified by the other stuff).

ATTL= Advanced Automated Through The Lens

OTF= Off The Film(surface)

I quickly checked Canon's website for the 300EZ manual and couldn't find it, so I'm not sure if it has ATTL or not, but from memory(not too good these days) I think that all EZ models had it, in fact I believe ATTL was the hallmark of the EZ units and the reason for the moniker "EZ".

It was basically a form of automated flash control similar in results to today's ETTL system, though the implementation is completely different as it used a real-time shutdown of the flash output when a reflection off of the film surface indicated correct exposure, rather than a preflash measurement of how much flash power is needed followed by a fixed duration flash pulse. ATTL obviously could not work for digital but worked very nicely with film. In fact ATTL worked better IMO than ETTL for film when tested against each other on my EOS 3 film SLR.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

84,407 views & 0 likes for this thread, 102 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
PLEASE bring back eye-control AF!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1701 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.