Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Jun 2012 (Wednesday) 07:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Microadjustment shift

 
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Jun 13, 2012 07:57 |  #1

I recently noticed that my images werent as sharp as they used to be. I thought perhaps it was me and I was just doing something wrong but last night I was shooting wide open at 1.4 and couldnt get a keeper to save my life. So I broke out the focus chart and sure enough, both of the lenses that I use regulalry needed to be moved negative to get them back to focus. Has anyone else had something like this happen? Is it perhaps the temperature change and expansion and contraction of the components? I last set my MA at Christmas time.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Jun 13, 2012 09:14 |  #2

You didn't by any chance do one calibration in artificial light and the other in daylight?

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Jun 13, 2012 09:24 |  #3

I did the first one indoors under strong tungsten light and last night inside again but with just daylight coming through the windows. Oddly though, the softish images didnt start showing up until about a few weeks ago.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Jun 13, 2012 10:05 as a reply to  @ JakAHearts's post |  #4

Probably not related to the light then. I've noticed that the calibration can vary quite a bit between daylight and a warmer tone artificial setup.

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Jun 13, 2012 10:07 |  #5

Thanks for the replies Bob. I remember another member (though I dont remember whom) talking about having to send in their 85L every year or so to get it calibrated.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Jun 13, 2012 10:29 as a reply to  @ JakAHearts's post |  #6

My 85L seems okay it's the 50L that drives me to distraction. I eventually changed it for another and I'm still seeing the same thing (only on the 1Ds3, it's fine on the 1D4's)

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jun 13, 2012 14:41 |  #7

I saw significant difference in MA values when using tungsten light vs. daylight. (Probably more so for fluorescent and LED).


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,460 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Microadjustment shift
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1458 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.