Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Jun 2012 (Friday) 07:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bad Time for buying a new body.

 
Martzart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
252 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Jun 16, 2012 11:35 |  #31

For me the reason i want to move on is i suspect a problem with my body (T2i),
when i first bought it I had an accident I fell into a rock-bed photographing waterfalls in Hamilton.
The camera hit the rock bed making the mode selection unable to turn Which I was able to fix.
The lcd flickers off and on at times.

Because it was fall damage not really covered in the warranty .
I have considered sending it in..but I suspect repair costs would be close enough that i should just move on and upgrade, then get my lenses re-calibrated to the new body if any are off.

My problem is that I have situations where there is no way a shot should miss and i get oof shots that are not caused from shutter speed poor lighting or shallow depth of field.

I went out the other morning and had a mother red-winged blackbird flapping protectively around me.
Suspecting that i was close to the nest I settled down on one knee and waited for her to land on some nearby weeds to complain at me a bit about 4 yards away.
I took several shots with a 70-200mm at 200mm f8. 1/200 sec - 1/250. iso 200 I should have been at iso 400 given the shutter speed.. but I have taken many many clear perched bird photo's in the past at 1/200
With an aperture of f.8 the bird should have been in focus.
Single point af on the centre of the birds breast feathering the half press until it appeared to have the focus locked on.
Bottom line is the pictures should have been in focus and they where all misses I have shot enough birds to know when my equipment isn't working and when a bird is still enough to nail the shots. This is just one of many recent examples at this point its time to move on to make photography enjoyable for me again.


Deviant Art ~ (external link) T4i/ T2i /Rip300d ~ 50mm f1.2L/135mm f2L/ 70-200mm f4L/ 100mm 2.8 macro/ Sigma 70-200 2.8/ Tamron 17-50 2.8/ 50 1.8 ~ 430 exII/ Vivitar 285hv/ Metz 60 ct-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whtrbt7
Member
47 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 16, 2012 11:52 |  #32

For a crop body, the T2i/550D really does it for me. I'm also more of a manual shooter so it doesn't really matter if the focus features and automatic features work for me. Base quality of the sensor on the T2i/550D is similar to the base quality on even the newer cameras or even the 7D. For a crop body, I feel that the minimum amount of camera for the sensor technology is acceptable and hence, I shoot with the 550D for all my 1.6x crop. It's just lighter and more portable and if I smash it, I'm not going to be too upset (unless they stop producing the 550D). I don't have a need for a swivel screen, or advanced AF, or even AF on such a camera hence, it's best to go with the lightest and cheapest version of the sensor. I would probably be happy if they stripped the on-camera-flash, the mode dial (just have M, Bulb, Av, Tv, C1, C2, C3), and mirror. A simple and elegant solution is always going to be best.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PopTarts
Member
72 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 16, 2012 13:51 |  #33

Nick - I think you especially would love the 7D? Used a t2i for two years, upgraded, and the 7D has made me so happy since. Not afraid to use Iso 3200, even, most of the time.


5D3 / 6D ||| 17-40L / 24-70L 4.0 IS / 40 / 50 1.4 / 70-200L 2.8 / 70-300L / 85 1.8 / 100L Macro
John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick3434
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Trespassing in South Florida
     
Jun 16, 2012 15:28 |  #34

John, no doubt. Allegedly the 70d may actually be better than the current 7d(basiclly it will be the 7d with digic 5 and flip screen...aledgedly) and the 7d successor will be stupid fast fps etc. if that is not the case, then a used 7d will be a bargin with the mark2 out, if it is then 70d.

Believe it or not, I am not this methodical with my life outside of work/business and am very impulsive and happy go lucky. However, as this thread implies, I do believe that if you are a hobbyist canon shooter with money in apsc lenses and are due for a new prosumer body, this fall should be worth the wait. Logic would tell me that canon cant let another model year go by without pulling out some stops to silence recent years fanfare of the D7000 etc. If canon had been kicking nikons ass the last few years then I wouldn't expect as much.


Everything is relative.
Gear: 6D, Unholy Trinity:twisted: (24Lii, sigma 50A, 135L), and for the other ends of the spectrum, sigmaEX 14mm2.8 and sigmaEX 100-300F4.
Fuji X-e2, Rokinon 8 2.8 Fisheye II, Fuji 14 2.8, Fuji 18-55, Fuji 23 1.4
FlikR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jun 16, 2012 16:03 |  #35

Nick3434 wrote in post #14587438 (external link)
Things annoying me on xsi and why I am ready to move on. All of these are things I never had a problem with until I reached a certain point, mainly about the last 5 months.


Focus in general, but I pretty much only use center point auto focus, recompose when I can, or crop when it is a moving object. Ai servo mode is very ehh at best, and for my surfing pics this last winter the fps stood out.

Viewfinder. Looking through a 7d viewfinder is quite a different experience.

These two things alone suggest that you should get a 7D, particularly if you get one from CLP for $1100. No other crop camera in Canon's lineup has a viewfinder as good as the 7D's, and it really is wonderful to see in the viewfinder exactly what you're going to get in the resulting shot (due to 100% viewfinder coverage).


High Iso straight sucks on the xsi. Shooting at 800 needs crazy noise reduction, then you guys post 1600 shots that look much better. I shoot interior for work and setting up a tripod isn't always an option, and neither is a large aperture to capture what I sell, so if I am stuck with f8, and a 1/30 shutter speed minimum, something has to give handheld and it is the iso. Xsi makes me scared to shoot over 400, 800 if I have no other choice like when I went to the Sistine chapel and honestly I spent more time switching back to 400 when I could than enjoying shooting.

This is probably more a matter of postprocessing than anything else. What are you using to do your postprocessing with? Lightroom 3 and up could easily reinvigorate your high ISO shots. That said, I find the 7D's high ISO to be excellent.

Yes, the 650D/70D may wind up having better out-of-the-box IQ than the 7D, and it may even perform noticeably better at high ISO, but the real question is what ISO performance level is enough for your needs. The 7D's is usable all the way up to 12800 and it'll do nicely at 6400, and while there may be occasions where you might want to go higher than that, I expect that would be relatively rare.

Image iq from the xsi is great, I really don't feel like my still shots are far off of anything the digic 4 guys are showing, at that point use of light and composure makes much more of a difference. Whatever is gained here is bonus, but not reason to upgrade.

The 7D's image quality is excellent as well, but it is a bit of a demanding camera in terms of postprocessing if you want the very best out of it. If you want critically sharp images at 100% magnification and a low noise signature at ISO 100, you have to work at it a bit. If you're using Lightroom, you can create a preset that will get you almost exactly where you'll want to be, and you can then tweak a couple of the values involved to get the rest of the way there for the specific image you're processing.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ T
Senior Member
Avatar
567 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Dec 2007
Location: The Burg, Florida
     
Jun 16, 2012 19:54 |  #36

Buy used now, by time the rumors become true the value on the camera will probably drop $100-$200 depending on the price of the new camera bodies, and which model you buy now. I would shoot for the 7D since, find a decent use one for ~$1000, sell it if something better comes out that you want. No sense in buying new now.


Canon Gripped 5D Mark iii x2 & 1DX | Canon 400mm & 300mm f/2.8 L IS | Canon 15mm, 16-35mm f/4 IS, 24-70mm f/2.8 ii, and 85 f/1.2 Mark ii | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II |Canon 580EX II Speedlite Flash | Canon 1.4x III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jun 16, 2012 22:08 |  #37

Eric T wrote in post #14589032 (external link)
Buy used now, by time the rumors become true the value on the camera will probably drop $100-$200 depending on the price of the new camera bodies, and which model you buy now. I would shoot for the 7D since, find a decent use one for ~$1000, sell it if something better comes out that you want. No sense in buying new now.

I'd get one from CLP. The $100 (or less) extra you pay gets you a 90 day warranty from Canon. That, I think, is easily worth it for such a piece of equipment, particularly one that some people have had significant problems with.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick3434
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Trespassing in South Florida
     
Jun 17, 2012 09:03 |  #38

I process with aperture and nik plug ins. I hate pp and kinda suck at it, but I really like the nik software. I am not opposed to getting Lightroom, but I am happy with what I have. I remove noise with nik define, it is excellent. I don't want to shoot at 6400, I just want very usable and workable photos at 1600 and maybe 3200, which is impossible for the xsi regardless of software.

I really don't want a 7d. I just think that the September announcements for canon will be interesting, and another 3 months on top of 3 years of 450 ownership will not kill me. I plan on having my next body a very long time. Hell, I plan on having the xsi a long time too!


Everything is relative.
Gear: 6D, Unholy Trinity:twisted: (24Lii, sigma 50A, 135L), and for the other ends of the spectrum, sigmaEX 14mm2.8 and sigmaEX 100-300F4.
Fuji X-e2, Rokinon 8 2.8 Fisheye II, Fuji 14 2.8, Fuji 18-55, Fuji 23 1.4
FlikR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jpfiff
Member
64 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 17, 2012 10:54 |  #39

I was thinking the same, but I really don't want to buy new...the price savings on the CLP is just not worth getting the latest camera. I plan on either get a refurb 60D or 7D when I do finally get one.

You can always sell the refurb and get the "newest" refurb at at later day.

With the cost savings from the refurb price I can get better lenses and not feel like I'm over-spending too much :)


_______________
Jen :D
Canon 60D, Canon XTI, Canon 17-55 IS f2.8, Canon 50mm 1.4, Canon 55-250mm IS, Canon 18-55 kit lens, 430 EXII flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick3434
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Trespassing in South Florida
     
Jun 17, 2012 12:43 |  #40

That is pretty solid advice as well Jen. I too hate to buy new, except I bought everything I have used and cheap except a few lenses(sigmas that I love, but just in case as recorse) so I figured maybe it would be OK to treat myself if the latest and greatest is really that much better.

If not, I think despite the hate on here for the 60d, it is a pretty nice camera, and furthermore it is flat out awesome at the clp price. You make a good point in a clp 60d today, and in a year or so if inclined get a used 70d or whatever........hmmmmm​mmmmm. Lots of options.


Everything is relative.
Gear: 6D, Unholy Trinity:twisted: (24Lii, sigma 50A, 135L), and for the other ends of the spectrum, sigmaEX 14mm2.8 and sigmaEX 100-300F4.
Fuji X-e2, Rokinon 8 2.8 Fisheye II, Fuji 14 2.8, Fuji 18-55, Fuji 23 1.4
FlikR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jun 17, 2012 18:14 |  #41

Nick3434 wrote in post #14590678 (external link)
I process with aperture and nik plug ins. I hate pp and kinda suck at it, but I really like the nik software. I am not opposed to getting Lightroom, but I am happy with what I have. I remove noise with nik define, it is excellent. I don't want to shoot at 6400, I just want very usable and workable photos at 1600 and maybe 3200, which is impossible for the xsi regardless of software.

Nik DFine is indeed excellent. If that's not getting you the results you want, then Lightroom probably won't. Even so, you might consider grabbing Lightroom and using it in "trial" mode for a month. If you find it breathes new life into your XTi, then it may be worth buying.

I really don't want a 7d. I just think that the September announcements for canon will be interesting, and another 3 months on top of 3 years of 450 ownership will not kill me. I plan on having my next body a very long time. Hell, I plan on having the xsi a long time too!

Well, the real question is why don't you want a 7D? It sounds like it would meet your needs perfectly (the viewfinder, the autofocus, and the high ISO are all what you seem to be looking for). There's certainly nothing wrong with waiting to see what Canon comes out with next, but the 650D should show us what the sensor will be capable of, and for taking still shots it's hard to see how Canon could improve substantially on the 7D in other areas, except perhaps in its quality control (that some people get 7Ds which prove to be a consistent problem while others have no problems with theirs while doing the same thing is a quality control problem, not an indictment of the camera itself).

Furthermore, whatever Canon comes out with next will cost substantially more than a 7D does right now, particularly if you pick up said 7D from CLP. Everything Canon has introduced of late, even the 650D, has been priced notably higher than its predecessor.

So you can certainly wait, and there's certainly no harm in that at all, but I don't really see any substantial advantages to it, either, given the needs you've outlined.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martzart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
252 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Jun 17, 2012 19:43 |  #42

I bought the original 6mp 300d rebel with non is 18-55 kit when it launched in 2003 at $1000 us when the Canadian dollar was about 130 cents for every us dollar + 14 % tax = 1300 before tax, ended up paying about 2200 for the camera mem card uv, filter, prot plan etc all in total after tax.

Definitely get a lot more bang your buck today.


Deviant Art ~ (external link) T4i/ T2i /Rip300d ~ 50mm f1.2L/135mm f2L/ 70-200mm f4L/ 100mm 2.8 macro/ Sigma 70-200 2.8/ Tamron 17-50 2.8/ 50 1.8 ~ 430 exII/ Vivitar 285hv/ Metz 60 ct-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Jun 17, 2012 21:41 |  #43

Martzart - you may want to go ahead and send it in and see what it will cost. That's a nice camera. I still have mine. Depending on the details you may be surprised and get a repair that doesn't cost too much. They look it over and quote you a price before actually doing it. I don't think they charge you if you decide not to fix it. Even if it costs $400, you still would have a camera you could get roughly $700 for. That's $300 you lose just getting rid of it. I wouldn't use it for the CLP when a simple broker P&S can get you the same discount.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
3,005 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2011
Location: The Great White North
     
Jun 18, 2012 13:56 |  #44

Nick3434 wrote in post #14590678 (external link)
I just want very usable and workable photos at 1600 and maybe 3200, which is impossible for the xsi regardless of software.

If you expose correctly at 1600 on an XSi it should be fine. You will probably need some fast glass to get it there, though. 3200 of course is impossible since it can't go that high.

Generally speaking if you underexpose at high ISO and push in post you will run into noise issues.


Joel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick3434
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Trespassing in South Florida
     
Jun 18, 2012 20:26 as a reply to  @ joeblack2022's post |  #45

Ok, define works awesome and I love it. Exposed correctly can I get nice family moments that look fine on my laptop or small prints, sure. If I need to hand hold a small aperture shot for work that I only have one chance to get what I need, meaning I may get home and realize I need to work a little harder at processing then no way for something to represent to a client, or at least not for my eye.

Would a 7d be great, sure. Do I feel I should buy one at this point considering what this thread is all about, for me personally, no. If a 70d is $1800, I won't get it. Again, I am just waiting it out. I will have this next body forever and I see the potential for long term VALUE, not price, depending on how good the body is and what it costs.

Believe me, I am captain getting things used and on the cheap, but to answer this thread, I think that in the summer of 2012, value may be in waiting to see if canon releases a Nikon killer for $1300 or so. Last year at this time I would have bought a used 7d no questions asked.


Everything is relative.
Gear: 6D, Unholy Trinity:twisted: (24Lii, sigma 50A, 135L), and for the other ends of the spectrum, sigmaEX 14mm2.8 and sigmaEX 100-300F4.
Fuji X-e2, Rokinon 8 2.8 Fisheye II, Fuji 14 2.8, Fuji 18-55, Fuji 23 1.4
FlikR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,399 views & 0 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it.
Bad Time for buying a new body.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2832 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.