Basically as the title says, I shoot 90% landscape photography, at an advanced amateur/semi pro level, I do shoot some sports occasionally... and I was going to sell the 40d but am wondering if it would be better for this type of photography? I'm going to guess not because the 5d2 is probably sharper/cleaner even accounting for the cropping in vs. 1.6x crop factor.
I know the main advantage would be to be able to shoot with 2 bodies (40d w/ telephoto, and 5d2 with mid range zoom), I'm not really planning on having any gigs where I actually need that functionality. Other than that, any reason to keep the 40d? Larger file size on the 5d2 is also not a concern.


