aquaforester wrote in post #16881935
I Just don't get the same IQ from the 40 without doing alot of PP. When I said 'flat' just not exciting in very unscientific terms.
I don't think that scientific terms are necessary, but the problem is that you're not being at all descriptive. "Not the same IQ," "flat," and "not exciting," are so vague that they don't provide much of a jumping off point for a conversation. If you're doing a lot of PP to overcome said shortcomings, maybe you could start off by describing what PP you're doing so as to provide at least a hint as to what those shortcomings might be?
It looks like you've got some good doses of saturation going on, but the color out this lens isn't something that I'm dissatisfied with. I don't have any complaints on sharpness, either. It doesn't have the micro-contrast of a Zeiss, but neither do most Canons, regardless of price.