Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 Jun 2012 (Tuesday) 19:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Finally! 70-200 f/2.8L

 
Tim ­ S
Goldmember
Avatar
1,496 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Jun 19, 2012 19:45 |  #1

Cleaned out the camera bag, sold a few items including my Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II. Came home with the Canon 70-200 f/2.8L and the 1.4x III TC. Now I need to find a game to shoot..:D


Tim
Equipment

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 19, 2012 19:55 |  #2

that's a great combo. curious, why the 1.4xIII and not the II?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christina.DazzleByDesign
Goldmember
Avatar
1,973 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jun 19, 2012 19:57 |  #3

rick_reno wrote in post #14603203 (external link)
that's a great combo. curious, why the 1.4xIII and not the II?

The III is the newest one, isn't it??


5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
| Facebook (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear List |Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
genjurok
Senior Member
537 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jun 19, 2012 20:13 |  #4

I have the non-macro sigma 70-200 2.8, PQ is actually pretty good. WIsh it had IS though.

One day I will get either the 70-200 2.8 MK II or 70-200 OS. :D


6D
Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 100mm f/2
580 EX | 430 EX | Pixel King Pro wireless radio trigger and receiver (x2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 19, 2012 21:24 |  #5

Christina.DazzleByDesi​gn wrote in post #14603210 (external link)
The III is the newest one, isn't it??

Yes, it is the new one. All the reports I've seen is there is minimal improvement with the 1.4x III vs. the 1.4x II. The real gain in the new TC's comes with the 2x III.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kwando
Goldmember
Avatar
1,345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aurora, Co
     
Jun 19, 2012 21:27 |  #6

I picked up a 70-200 2.8 IS mk1 several weeks ago and it's awesome! Hasn't left my 7d since actually my friend has my 24-70

You will not be disappointed. I'll eventually get a 1.4 TC as well


~Simon~
My Gear | My Feedback | Smugmug (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1213134

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christina.DazzleByDesign
Goldmember
Avatar
1,973 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jun 19, 2012 21:48 |  #7

kwando wrote in post #14603571 (external link)
I picked up a 70-200 2.8 IS mk1 several weeks ago and it's awesome! Hasn't left my 7d since actually my friend has my 24-70

You will not be disappointed. I'll eventually get a 1.4 TC as well

The mk1 is discontinued now so i think the OP has the non-is L version. Is there any difference between the two or is it just one has IS and one doesn't?


5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
| Facebook (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear List |Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimewall
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 19, 2012 22:10 as a reply to  @ Christina.DazzleByDesign's post |  #8

Yes, Some say the non-IS is sharper WO, some disagree. I've never used the non-IS, but my IS is sharp enough WO for me right now.


Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christina.DazzleByDesign
Goldmember
Avatar
1,973 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jun 19, 2012 22:16 |  #9

jimewall wrote in post #14603748 (external link)
Yes, Some say the non-IS is sharper WO, some disagree. I've never used the non-IS, but my IS is sharp enough WO for me right now.

Sorry but what does WO stand for ? :o


5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
| Facebook (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear List |Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigSky
Senior Member
745 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Billings, Montana
     
Jun 19, 2012 23:11 as a reply to  @ Christina.DazzleByDesign's post |  #10

Wide Open




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
URLphotographer
Member
143 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 20, 2012 05:04 as a reply to  @ BigSky's post |  #11

Congrats.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tim ­ S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,496 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Jun 20, 2012 22:37 |  #12

rick_reno wrote in post #14603203 (external link)
that's a great combo. curious, why the 1.4xIII and not the II?

Christina.DazzleByDesi​gn wrote in post #14603653 (external link)
The mk1 is discontinued now so i think the OP has the non-is L version. Is there any difference between the two or is it just one has IS and one doesn't?

1.4x III because the day will come when I want a long prime. It is supposed to be marginally better with CA control. I will say that a lot of people say they saw no difference between the II and the III.

I bought the 70-200 f/2.8 without IS. I would not get any benefit from IS for what I shoot.


Tim
Equipment

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 844
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Jun 20, 2012 22:39 |  #13

IS or not that is an awesome lens.


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skygod44
"in stockings and suspenders"
Avatar
6,454 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo!
     
Jun 20, 2012 22:41 as a reply to  @ Tim S's post |  #14

Congrats!

And well done for buying what you knew you needed!!! :-)

[I've also got the 70-200L 2.8 non-IS because it's what I need for what I shoot]

Cheers for now, and I'm sure you'll enjoy the lens!

Simon :D


"Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
6D/7D and ALL Canon/Sigma gear SOLD!!!! Now: Olympus PEN EP-5 & OM-D EM-5 Mk2 and 8 lenses!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tim ­ S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,496 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Jun 20, 2012 22:50 |  #15

skygod44 wrote in post #14609382 (external link)
Congrats!

And well done for buying what you knew you needed!!! :-)

[I've also got the 70-200L 2.8 non-IS because it's what I need for what I shoot]

Cheers for now, and I'm sure you'll enjoy the lens!

Simon :D

Thank you! It only takes one time of NOT doing that to learn your le$$on... I bought what I thought I could use the first time instead of what I knew I needed. Now I have it!


Tim
Equipment

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,023 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Finally! 70-200 f/2.8L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1233 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.