Cleaned out the camera bag, sold a few items including my Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II. Came home with the Canon 70-200 f/2.8L and the 1.4x III TC. Now I need to find a game to shoot..
Jun 19, 2012 19:45 | #1 Cleaned out the camera bag, sold a few items including my Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II. Came home with the Canon 70-200 f/2.8L and the 1.4x III TC. Now I need to find a game to shoot.. Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 19, 2012 19:55 | #2 that's a great combo. curious, why the 1.4xIII and not the II?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Christina.DazzleByDesign Goldmember 1,973 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2012 More info | Jun 19, 2012 19:57 | #3 rick_reno wrote in post #14603203 that's a great combo. curious, why the 1.4xIII and not the II? The III is the newest one, isn't it?? 5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
genjurok Senior Member 537 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Jun 19, 2012 20:13 | #4 I have the non-macro sigma 70-200 2.8, PQ is actually pretty good. WIsh it had IS though. 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 19, 2012 21:24 | #5 Christina.DazzleByDesign wrote in post #14603210 The III is the newest one, isn't it?? Yes, it is the new one. All the reports I've seen is there is minimal improvement with the 1.4x III vs. the 1.4x II. The real gain in the new TC's comes with the 2x III.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kwando Goldmember 1,345 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Aurora, Co More info | Jun 19, 2012 21:27 | #6 I picked up a 70-200 2.8 IS mk1 several weeks ago and it's awesome! Hasn't left my 7d since actually my friend has my 24-70 ~Simon~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Christina.DazzleByDesign Goldmember 1,973 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2012 More info | Jun 19, 2012 21:48 | #7 kwando wrote in post #14603571 I picked up a 70-200 2.8 IS mk1 several weeks ago and it's awesome! Hasn't left my 7d since actually my friend has my 24-70 You will not be disappointed. I'll eventually get a 1.4 TC as well The mk1 is discontinued now so i think the OP has the non-is L version. Is there any difference between the two or is it just one has IS and one doesn't? 5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jimewall Goldmember 1,871 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Yes, Some say the non-IS is sharper WO, some disagree. I've never used the non-IS, but my IS is sharp enough WO for me right now. Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Christina.DazzleByDesign Goldmember 1,973 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2012 More info | Jun 19, 2012 22:16 | #9 jimewall wrote in post #14603748 Yes, Some say the non-IS is sharper WO, some disagree. I've never used the non-IS, but my IS is sharp enough WO for me right now. Sorry but what does WO stand for ? 5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigSky Senior Member 745 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Billings, Montana More info | Wide Open
LOG IN TO REPLY |
URLphotographer Member 143 posts Joined Apr 2012 More info | Congrats.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 20, 2012 22:37 | #12 rick_reno wrote in post #14603203 that's a great combo. curious, why the 1.4xIII and not the II? Christina.DazzleByDesign wrote in post #14603653 The mk1 is discontinued now so i think the OP has the non-is L version. Is there any difference between the two or is it just one has IS and one doesn't? 1.4x III because the day will come when I want a long prime. It is supposed to be marginally better with CA control. I will say that a lot of people say they saw no difference between the II and the III. Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skygod44 "in stockings and suspenders" 6,454 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 110 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo! More info | Congrats! "Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 20, 2012 22:50 | #15 skygod44 wrote in post #14609382 Congrats! And well done for buying what you knew you needed!!! ![]() [I've also got the 70-200L 2.8 non-IS because it's what I need for what I shoot] Cheers for now, and I'm sure you'll enjoy the lens! Simon ![]() Thank you! It only takes one time of NOT doing that to learn your le$$on... I bought what I thought I could use the first time instead of what I knew I needed. Now I have it! Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1233 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||