Bird Photography by rkirkphotography, on Flickr"](DUPLICATE IMAGE)
Bird Photography by rkirkphotography, on Flickr
RobPhoto Member 97 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Bird Photography by rkirkphotography, on Flickr"] (DUPLICATE IMAGE) Bird Photography by rkirkphotography, on FlickrSome Canon gear. Some flash gear.. a little bit of magic.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rishardana Member 36 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Feb 19, 2013 21:52 | #3422 Hinson wrote in post #15626925 Nice shot. I'm particularly interested since it was shot with the 10-22. Was this an HDR PP? (HDR is great when you can't tell if it's HDR or not) Hi Hinson, thank you
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2013 23:55 | #3423 Haven't been on here in a long time but some recent HDR shots from the weekend. A some of my slot car track.  Sunset in Half Moon Bay by Doogle510, on Flickr Sunset in Half Moon Bay by Doogle510, on Flickr Slot Cars B&W HDR by Doogle510, on Flickr Slot Cars HDR by Doogle510, on Flickr7D Mark ii l 100mm f/2.8 l 70-200mm f/2.8 l Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 l Tamron 10-24mm l 430EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hjl Member 158 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Feb 20, 2013 15:14 | #3424  St. Peter's Church - Jaffa by hjl, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 20, 2013 16:44 | #3425 oxygen45 wrote in post #15622655 Hi, relatively new 60D owner here, wondering what people set as max ISO usually. Since noise reduction software
Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D Lens: 70-200mm Focal Length: 70.0mm Aperture: f/2.8 Exposure Time: 0.0010 s (1/1000) ISO equiv: 6400 Exposure Bias: none Metering Mode: Matrix Exposure: Manual Exposure Mode: Manual White Balance: Manual Flash Fired: No (enforced) Orientation: Normal Color Space: sRGB Software: Imagenomic Noiseware
Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D Focal Length: 70.0mm Aperture: f/2.8 Exposure Time: 0.0013 s (1/800) ISO equiv: 6400 Exposure Bias: none Metering Mode: Matrix Exposure: Manual Exposure Mode: Manual White Balance: Manual Flash Fired: No (enforced) Orientation: Normal Color Space: sRGB Software: Imagenomic Noiseware
Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D Focal Length: 70.0mm Aperture: f/2.8 Exposure Time: 0.0010 s (1/1000) ISO equiv: 6400 Exposure Bias: none Metering Mode: Matrix Exposure: Manual Exposure Mode: Manual White Balance: Manual Flash Fired: No (enforced) Orientation: Normal Color Space: sRGB Software: Imagenomic Noiseware
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hjl Member 158 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Feb 21, 2013 07:53 | #3426 Domed ceiling at the Church of All Nations, Jerusalem. Handheld, Canon 10-22, 1/13, f/3.5, ISO 6400, pressing the limit of what the equipment can do. Noise reduction and levels adjustment in LR4.  Like the night sky by hjl, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tjsnydernj Member  87 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2012 Location: Galloway, NJ More info | Feb 21, 2013 13:04 | #3427 I can't wait to join the ranks of the 60D owners. Have been shooting a T3 for the past year. Picking up a well-cared for 60D from a friend since he upgraded. Canon EOS 60D gripped || Canon EOS T3 || EF 50mm 1.8 II || EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS || EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III || Sigma 17-50mm 2.8 EX DC OS || EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM || flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheRepairMan Hatchling 3 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | This might be my very first post here... I'm not sure, but I've had my 60D for about a year and a half now, and have checked in here from time to time admiring all the great work. It's good for me to see the fact that this body "can" produce great shots, but I'm still having to shoot with the 18-135 kit lens, and have just never gotten real excited with it. If things turn around for me, hopefully I can invest in some sharper glass. Until then I'll continue to work on learning the camera's system, and overcoming my own short-comings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
studlyism Senior Member 593 posts Likes: 25 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Queens, N.Y More info | Feb 21, 2013 20:13 | #3429 TheRepairMan wrote in post #15637743 This might be my very first post here... I'm not sure, but I've had my 60D for about a year and a half now, and have checked in here from time to time admiring all the great work. It's good for me to see the fact that this body "can" produce great shots, but I'm still having to shoot with the 18-135 kit lens, and have just never gotten real excited with it. If things turn around for me, hopefully I can invest in some sharper glass. Until then I'll continue to work on learning the camera's system, and overcoming my own short-comings. Keep up the good work guys! -Roger dude.. just take pictures and post. Am sure you have some great picks Ron/5diii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
khughes44 Member 200 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2012 Location: Vancouver BC More info | Feb 21, 2013 20:34 | #3430 TheRepairMan wrote in post #15637743 This might be my very first post here... I'm not sure, but I've had my 60D for about a year and a half now, and have checked in here from time to time admiring all the great work. It's good for me to see the fact that this body "can" produce great shots, but I'm still having to shoot with the 18-135 kit lens, and have just never gotten real excited with it. If things turn around for me, hopefully I can invest in some sharper glass. Until then I'll continue to work on learning the camera's system, and overcoming my own short-comings. Keep up the good work guys! -Roger You own a fabulous lens. Want proof?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheRepairMan Hatchling 3 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Feb 21, 2013 21:18 | #3431 studlyism wrote in post #15637914 dude.. just take pictures and post. Am sure you have some great picks I guess I have a few "not so bad" pics. khughes44 wrote in post #15637990 You own a fabulous lens. Want proof? https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=188563 Your "proof" looks like it is from a 28-135. My 18-135 kit lens just isn't all that great, IMO. Or, maybe I just got a bad copy. I really don't know. I didn't come here to bad mouth my lens, but I'm just saying I think I might be happier with the results from something else. Not necessarily more expensive, but like maybe a faster prime lens with greater clarity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
khughes44 Member 200 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2012 Location: Vancouver BC More info | Feb 21, 2013 22:42 | #3432 TheRepairMan wrote in post #15638170 I guess I have a few "not so bad" pics. Your "proof" looks like it is from a 28-135. My 18-135 kit lens just isn't all that great, IMO. Or, maybe I just got a bad copy. I really don't know. I didn't come here to bad mouth my lens, but I'm just saying I think I might be happier with the results from something else. Not necessarily more expensive, but like maybe a faster prime lens with greater clarity. -R I'm sorry, I posted the wrong link. But all the same, you can get great results with the 18-135. The 18-135 thread has some great images.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF....  More info | a few artzies from today ~  Image hosted by forum (638144) © Immaculens [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (638145) © Immaculens [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF.... More info | and a few more from today ~
IMG_2689 by Immaculens.com, on Flickr
IMG_2836 by Immaculens.com, on Flickr
IMG_2748 by Immaculens.com, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rishardana Member 36 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Feb 22, 2013 02:22 | #3435 This is what happens if it's one's first time and probably the only opportunity one can have to visit a great city but it's gloomy, overcast, and raining #BW and #HDR  Brooklyn Bridge by rishardana, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1692 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
