Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Jun 2012 (Saturday) 10:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1DX owners unite! Discuss and post photos!

 
doofuss
Goldmember
Avatar
1,883 posts
Likes: 559
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Jan 18, 2014 18:23 |  #5386

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3695/12013068336_40ab8686ae_b.jpg

Canon 1dx & 7d gripped, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L, Sigma 120-300 f2.8 (sports), Sigma 70-200mm f2.8, Sigma 24-70 f2.8, Canon EFS 17-55mm f2.8, , Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5 - 5.6, Sigma 2 x teleconverter, Canon 600EX-RT Speedlight.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
Jan 18, 2014 19:48 |  #5387

jack880 wrote in post #16616084 (external link)
One shot AF also seems to front focus at some distances, but not as badly as in AI Servo.

Have you tried various AF cases? I assume so and I cannot think of anything that would cause this. Tried other lenses? hope canon gets it sorted for you.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,749 posts
Gallery: 1929 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10225
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
     
Jan 18, 2014 23:04 |  #5388

Have you tried setting the camera on Zone AF and letting it use auto face detection to see if it makes any difference with tracking? Just curious.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Reviews | "The Mighty One" (external link) | "EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS Review" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jef96
Senior Member
Avatar
815 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jan 2010
Location: England
     
Jan 19, 2014 02:01 |  #5389

rdalrt wrote in post #16616371 (external link)
By all accounts I have seen, the new firmware works great. No problems. So I finally upgraded mine yesterday. Love the new features.

What are the "new features"; can you list them?


Canon EOS 1DX | Canon EOS 6D | 16-35mm f/2.8 L MKII | 24-70mm f/2.8 L MKII | 24-105mm f/4.0 L | 100mm macro f/2.8 L | 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS MKII | 400mm f/5.6 L | EF 2x II | 580 EX II | MR-14EX |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doofuss
Goldmember
Avatar
1,883 posts
Likes: 559
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Jan 19, 2014 02:12 |  #5390

The good thing about having a camera with you when you are out and about is that you can capture those special moments when they occur to help keep the memory alive for ever.

I snapped this pic of my daughter today whilst we were out wake boarding, and although Danica has been riding a wakeboard for quite a few years now, she had never tried a wake skate before. Getting up on these things is like trying to stand on ice with grease covered feet.

Danica was up and riding after just a couple of attempts and my camera captured her joy in doing so!


IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3676/12025761665_3266306429_b.jpg



The other good thing about having a camera on hand is that I can also capture moments like this one too.

She looks more like an Olympic sprinter jumping out of the blocks rather than someone about to stack it on a wake skate.

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7327/12026414764_8feaba0f46_b.jpg


And to be fair, I had better post a pic of her in contra; of her wakeboard too.


IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5486/12027352135_c17469338f_b.jpg

Canon 1dx & 7d gripped, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L, Sigma 120-300 f2.8 (sports), Sigma 70-200mm f2.8, Sigma 24-70 f2.8, Canon EFS 17-55mm f2.8, , Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5 - 5.6, Sigma 2 x teleconverter, Canon 600EX-RT Speedlight.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdalrt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,766 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 972
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Great White North
     
Jan 19, 2014 07:22 |  #5391

Jef96 wrote in post #16617485 (external link)
What are the "new features"; can you list them?

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1352985


Just Sports Photographyexternal link
My Junk ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jack880
Goldmember
Avatar
2,852 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 794
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Jan 19, 2014 07:51 |  #5392

2slo wrote in post #16616532 (external link)
That's bad news Jack. I can't follow how the camera can be front focusing though? I read what you said about Canon saying the adjustment was in excess of what M.A. could do, which tends to suggest that they've taken the lens element out and re aligned it. That was once done to my 400mm 5.6 which had a similar problem. Except in this case they haven't as the problem is clearly still there.
Assuming Canon were correct in their assessment then I would expect the adjusted lens to have come back precisely adjusted to your 1Dx, i.e. needing 0 M.A. at either end. That is perfectly possible, I have both and my 70-200mm is absolutely sharp at wide and long ends on my 1Dx.
The obvious question which occurs to me is, are other lenses you fit to your 1Dx exhibiting exactly the same problem? If so then the camera is off, if not then it must be your 70-200mm which needs recalibrating (and clearly hasn't been). A phone call to Canon on Monday I reckon.

Yep. They told me on the phone both camera and lens had been adjusted and calibrated together so would need no MA.

Not tried other lenses but later I will try my 70-200 mk1 which I haven't sold yet. It would be interesting to see what it's like but regardless, the camera and 70-200 mk2 should now be working perfectly together!

jase1125 wrote in post #16616857 (external link)
Have you tried various AF cases? I assume so and I cannot think of anything that would cause this. Tried other lenses? hope canon gets it sorted for you.

I've only really tried case 1 (which should be ideal for the simple task of tracking someone walking at a constant speed towards the camera), but within that I've tried various settings for acceleration/decelerat​ion. They don't make any difference.

Also, I may be wrong, but as all the options are set to prioritse focus over frame rate, shouldn't the camera not even be taking photos that are that out of focus? Shouldn't it just slow down the frame rate until focus is achieved for each shot? Even more so with the new firmware.

jwcdds wrote in post #16617272 (external link)
Have you tried setting the camera on Zone AF and letting it use auto face detection to see if it makes any difference with tracking? Just curious.

Not tried this, but I will do just out of interest. If that does work though, there still must be a problem for the normal focus point tracking not to work...

I'm really annoyed about this... I've spent a lot of money on the best body Canon make and one of their best lenses, got Canon to calibrate them, and yet still can't get a single sharp shot of someone walking...


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/jackhenriques/ (external link)
1DX, 7D, 20D, G7X II, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 16-35 f/2.8 L II, 50 f/1.8 II, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 17 f/4 L, 8-15 f/4 L, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6, Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro, x1.4 extender II, Kenko extension tubes, 430 EX II x 2, DJI Mavic Air

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Voaky999
Goldmember
Avatar
3,316 posts
Gallery: 810 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 907
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Edmonton,AB
     
Jan 19, 2014 09:40 |  #5393

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7398/12024548786_63ccb5197f_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …onvoaklander/12​024548786/  (external link)

Don
"Knowledge is Good" Emil Faber

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SBPhoto
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 842
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Waterford Ireland
     
Jan 19, 2014 11:29 as a reply to  @ doofuss's post |  #5394

Great images of your Daughter in action John


SBPhoto 1DXII 1DX 1D MK1V
1D MKIII IDs MKIII:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik ­ S. ­ Klein
uppity vermin fan
Avatar
1,069 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 217
Joined Jun 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jan 19, 2014 12:59 |  #5395

jack880 wrote in post #16617885 (external link)
It would be interesting to see what it's like but regardless, the camera and 70-200 mk2 should now be working perfectly together!

I had a similar problem with my setup. I sent the pair into Irvine and they fixed some electronic issue in the lens and the pair are now perfect together...

Hope you get this resolved.


Gear List
www.vintage-computer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jack880
Goldmember
Avatar
2,852 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 794
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Jan 19, 2014 13:33 |  #5396

Erik S. Klein wrote in post #16618635 (external link)
I had a similar problem with my setup. I sent the pair into Irvine and they fixed some electronic issue in the lens and the pair are now perfect together...

Hope you get this resolved.

That's interesting, thanks for letting me know. What were the symptoms with your problem? Was it just AI servo?

Looking back through all my photos I see that there are some burst sequences that have mostly sharp shots, but these are by far in the minority...


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/jackhenriques/ (external link)
1DX, 7D, 20D, G7X II, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 16-35 f/2.8 L II, 50 f/1.8 II, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 17 f/4 L, 8-15 f/4 L, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6, Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro, x1.4 extender II, Kenko extension tubes, 430 EX II x 2, DJI Mavic Air

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik ­ S. ­ Klein
uppity vermin fan
Avatar
1,069 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 217
Joined Jun 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jan 19, 2014 14:17 |  #5397

The AF mode didn't matter. And, once I got the lens fixed, it was obvious that I was experiencing the problem with it on my 5D2 as well...


Gear List
www.vintage-computer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SBPhoto
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 842
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Waterford Ireland
     
Jan 19, 2014 15:52 |  #5398

Some action shots from a Gaelic Hurling match today, Hurling is the fastest field game in the world.
1DX with 400/2.8L IS + 1.4C III

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3811/12039111596_3a3ba99de6_o.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5539/12038654494_ea002a7521_o.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3680/12038272435_02c6dea146_o.jpg

SBPhoto 1DXII 1DX 1D MK1V
1D MKIII IDs MKIII:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jack880
Goldmember
Avatar
2,852 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 794
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Jan 19, 2014 19:06 |  #5399

Erik S. Klein wrote in post #16618784 (external link)
The AF mode didn't matter. And, once I got the lens fixed, it was obvious that I was experiencing the problem with it on my 5D2 as well...

At one point during the day the IS on the lens starting sounding much louder when it started and stopped. I turned the camera off and on again and the sound went back to the normal volume.

Not sure if it could be related - was your issue anything to do with the IS??

Thanks


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/jackhenriques/ (external link)
1DX, 7D, 20D, G7X II, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 16-35 f/2.8 L II, 50 f/1.8 II, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 17 f/4 L, 8-15 f/4 L, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6, Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro, x1.4 extender II, Kenko extension tubes, 430 EX II x 2, DJI Mavic Air

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik ­ S. ­ Klein
uppity vermin fan
Avatar
1,069 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 217
Joined Jun 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jan 20, 2014 09:11 |  #5400

jack880 wrote in post #16619371 (external link)
Not sure if it could be related - was your issue anything to do with the IS??

I'm not quite sure. It's possible it was IS related although the lens never made any odd noises.

Canon is typically fairly cryptic on their repair notes. I was actually pretty impressed that they cited an electrical problem in the lens versus their usual "fixed...works" comments.

;)


Gear List
www.vintage-computer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,104,717 views & 5,519 likes for this thread, 696 members have posted to it and it is followed by 136 members.
1DX owners unite! Discuss and post photos!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1225 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.