Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Jun 2012 (Monday) 09:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

60D: White Balance Frustration.

 
TheRightLight
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 25, 2012 09:42 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I recently purchased a 60D from the CLP program.

While I am, generally speaking, quite pleased with the camera thus far, I have unfortunately discovered a custom setting that will disable White Balance access via the SET button (C.Fn IV, Page 2).

If you're like me, and you wish to have immediate access to the 8-Way AF selection pad, you will want to change C.Fn III, Page 2 from "0" to "1." This allows you to simply move the pad and select your point without having to hit any other button beforehand. Regrettably, this choice will also completely disable your White Balance setting (C.Fn IV, Page 2). Pressing the SET button will now merely direct your AF-point back to center, leaving you no choice but to menu-dive for the White Balance setting.

Is there *any* way to get around this crap? Or must I sacrifice "on-the-fly" WB switching? It was bad enough that they removed the button from the top panel, but to add insult to injury like this?

Gah. This is just plain *stupid* Canon!


Marketplace Feedback:
As a Seller: One. Two. Three. As a Buyer: Link.
My Ebay Account: 100% Positive Feedback. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,308 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 925
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Jun 25, 2012 09:50 |  #2

Do you change WB for every shot?
If not, set WB once with grey cart, if you need it custom, and shot as long as light is the same.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,666 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 403
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 25, 2012 09:51 |  #3

You can set the WB with a couple of clicks in the Q-menu.

*Stupid* is in the eye of the beholder... WB is not a setting that you change all the time, so it does not need to be in the first line of selections. A lot of people who shoot RAW, don't even bother setting the WB.

On the other hand, there are plenty of people (myself included) who set the AF point using the 8-way selection pad, and do it many times in a shooting day...


Gerry
Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheRightLight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 25, 2012 09:55 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

MakisM1 wrote in post #14628656 (external link)
You can set the WB with a couple of clicks in the Q-menu.

*Stupid* is in the eye of the beholder... WB is not a setting that you change all the time, so it does not need to be in the first line of selections. A lot of people who shoot RAW, don't even bother setting the WB.

On the other hand, there are plenty of people (myself included) who set the AF point using the 8-way selection pad, and do it many times in a shooting day...

Different strokes for different folks.

I use 2500K Kelvin for night shooting quite a bit, and it's annoying to be forced to menu-dive for it. This isn't a deal-breaker, but it's still pretty dumb on Canon's part, subjectively speaking.

The Q-Menu is probably the fastest way to get around to it now, and if I never change anything in there except for this setting, it should default to it, which makes life a bit easier. Still, this is all pretty silly. If the 60D wasn't so cheap via the CLP, I probably would have avoided it and waited for its successor.


Marketplace Feedback:
As a Seller: One. Two. Three. As a Buyer: Link.
My Ebay Account: 100% Positive Feedback. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AJSJones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,647 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 92
Joined Dec 2001
Location: California
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:01 |  #5

TheRightLight wrote in post #14628676 (external link)
Different strokes for different folks.

I use 2500K Kelvin for night shooting quite a bit, and it's annoying to be forced to menu-dive for it. This isn't a deal-breaker, but it's still pretty dumb on Canon's part, objectively speaking.

I think you mean "subjectively speaking" :). I shoot raw and sometimes tweak the WB during conversion. For possibly tricky or critical situations I either shoot a neutral card or a small Gretag card. Never occurred to me that it was stupid of Canon not to make it "easier".


My picture galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnB57
Goldmember
1,510 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Holmfirth, Yorkshire, England
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:03 |  #6

As Gerry says, the simple answer is to shoot in raw and select WB in post. I have never changed WB on any of my bodies.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheRightLight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:05 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

AJSJones wrote in post #14628698 (external link)
I think you mean "subjectively speaking" :). I shoot raw and sometimes tweak the WB during conversion. For possibly tricky or critical situations I either shoot a neutral card or a small Gretag card. Never occurred to me that it was stupid of Canon not to make it "easier".

Thanks for the grammar tip. ;)

Anyway, I am not alone in thinking that they should have just left the WB Button on the camera, but apparently folks here could care less.

Oh well, I'll just suck it up and use the Q button. It's annoying, but pretty minor in the grand scheme of things.


Marketplace Feedback:
As a Seller: One. Two. Three. As a Buyer: Link.
My Ebay Account: 100% Positive Feedback. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheRightLight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:05 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

JohnB57 wrote in post #14628711 (external link)
As Gerry says, the simple answer is to shoot in raw and select WB in post. I have never changed WB on any of my bodies.

I find this a bit tedious at times.

Why not get it right on the first try?


Marketplace Feedback:
As a Seller: One. Two. Three. As a Buyer: Link.
My Ebay Account: 100% Positive Feedback. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RHChan84
Goldmember
Avatar
2,320 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Mass
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:08 |  #9

I do at times but then I just use LR to process the RAW files and it takes care of it automatically if you wish. WB is one of those settings that is there and more useful if you shoot JPEG and not RAW.

I sometimes so wish it to see how it looks on the screen but most of the time, I just leave it on auto on the camera then adjust in lightroom.


Canon (60D Gripped | 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS | 40mm f2.8 | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 F4L IS| 430 EXII)
Tamron (17-50 f2.8 VC)
Feedback
Facebook (external link)

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnB57
Goldmember
1,510 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Holmfirth, Yorkshire, England
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:15 |  #10

TheRightLight wrote in post #14628721 (external link)
I find this a bit tedious at times.

Why not get it right on the first try?

Because it's a better way to do it? The raw file contains no information about WB/CT - software merely uses the camera setting as a start point for editing - so raw is a purer file format.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,666 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 403
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 25, 2012 10:17 |  #11

RHChan84 wrote in post #14628729 (external link)
I do at times but then I just use LR to process the RAW files and it takes care of it automatically if you wish. WB is one of those settings that is there and more useful if you shoot JPEG and not RAW.

I sometimes so wish it to see how it looks on the screen but most of the time, I just leave it on auto on the camera then adjust in lightroom.

I use Custom White Balance in studio shots with strobes. I shoot a WB tri-color (BGW) target to get highlights and blacks right and as a bonus I get a Custom White Balance shot.

Total times used: 5 (one per studio session).

I have close to 6000 photos with the 60D.

I would estimate changing AF point somewhere in the low hundreds...

Changing the WB without shooting a target? I tried it a few times, gave up on the pre-sets.

In the software I use (Darktable) the Camera WB is the starting position and you tweak from there. So it would be desirable to set the WB right...

Percentage of tweaked WB RAW photos PP'd: Approaching 100%...


Gerry
Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheRightLight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 25, 2012 11:12 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

MakisM1 wrote in post #14628772 (external link)
I use Custom White Balance in studio shots with strobes. I shoot a WB tri-color (BGW) target to get highlights and blacks right and as a bonus I get a Custom White Balance shot.

Total times used: 5 (one per studio session).

I have close to 6000 photos with the 60D.

I would estimate changing AF point somewhere in the low hundreds...

Changing the WB without shooting a target? I tried it a few times, gave up on the pre-sets.

In the software I use (Darktable) the Camera WB is the starting position and you tweak from there. So it would be desirable to set the WB right...

Percentage of tweaked WB RAW photos PP'd: Approaching 100%...

Fair enough. I suppose it isn't so terribly important. :oops:


Marketplace Feedback:
As a Seller: One. Two. Three. As a Buyer: Link.
My Ebay Account: 100% Positive Feedback. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AJSJones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,647 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 92
Joined Dec 2001
Location: California
     
Jun 25, 2012 12:58 |  #13

TheRightLight wrote in post #14628719 (external link)
Thanks for the grammar tip. ;)

It wasn't a grammar tip, just a meaning/sense issue. Opinions are subjective - we all have them. Things that we all agree on can be described objectively.

TheRightLight wrote in post #14628719 (external link)
Anyway, I am not alone in thinking that they should have just left the WB Button on the camera, but apparently folks here could care less..

See, different (subjective) opinions :D Anyway, I couldn't care less (that might be a grammar tip :D:D:D)

TheRightLight wrote in post #14628719 (external link)
Oh well, I'll just suck it up and use the Q button. It's annoying, but pretty minor in the grand scheme of things.

Way less annoying to me than, for example, how far down in the menus one has (or used to have) to go to get to mirror-lockup ....


My picture galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2794
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 25, 2012 13:55 |  #14

I leave WB on auto and fix later. I shoot raw so it doesn't matter to me. I'll just shoot a grey card and correct in PP.

no biggie.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
     
Jun 25, 2012 16:49 |  #15

TheRightLight wrote in post #14628628 (external link)
I recently purchased a 60D from the CLP program.

While I am, generally speaking, quite pleased with the camera thus far, I have unfortunately discovered a custom setting that will disable White Balance access via the SET button (C.Fn IV, Page 2).

If you're like me, and you wish to have immediate access to the 8-Way AF selection pad, you will want to change C.Fn III, Page 2 from "0" to "1." This allows you to simply move the pad and select your point without having to hit any other button beforehand. Regrettably, this choice will also completely disable your White Balance setting (C.Fn IV, Page 2). Pressing the SET button will now merely direct your AF-point back to center, leaving you no choice but to menu-dive for the White Balance setting.

Is there *any* way to get around this crap? Or must I sacrifice "on-the-fly" WB switching? It was bad enough that they removed the button from the top panel, but to add insult to injury like this?

Gah. This is just plain *stupid* Canon!

Unfortunately, this quirk is a known limitation...err, I mean feature of the 60D. You can't be in two places at the same time, or use the same set button for two purpose at the same time.. The set button can either be one or the other. I simply use option "0" and gave to push two buttons for focus points. I mostly use the center focus point, so no big deal for me.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,098 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
60D: White Balance Frustration.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is BluegrassRailfan
1015 guests, 202 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.