I usually let EOS Utility download the images. It's faster, since I only have to connect the camera and click on the "Download images" command. Actual transfer time may be longer, but then I go to do something else.
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | I usually let EOS Utility download the images. It's faster, since I only have to connect the camera and click on the "Download images" command. Actual transfer time may be longer, but then I go to do something else. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | there's a thousand ways to skin a cat of course, but pulling images at 60MB/s via USB3.... I usually don't have time to go and do something else! 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 13, 2012 05:28 | #1053 butterfly2937 wrote in post #14851027 Awesome shots! Which lens did you use the most at the zoo? Thanks! Only the sigma 50-500 os Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | My computer is too old to have USB 3 anyway. May reconsider if I get one of those. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | You wouldn't upgrade specifically to get it, but I had an old dunger anyway, and the new MB had it onboard. 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 13, 2012 08:06 | #1056 pixelbasher wrote in post #14851518 You wouldn't upgrade specifically to get it, but I had an old dunger anyway, and the new MB had it onboard. Thing that gets me is for years you'd be lucky to even reach half of the drive specs written on HDD's etc. but I'm getting both read and write speeds exactly as the CF card is written. If it says 30MB/s that's what I get, same with 60MB/s put it in perspective, my 2 internal drives, both fast 7200 rpm drives achieve around 90 MB/s so it's not far behind fast modern internal HDD speed. I'd like to try a 90MB/s card one day and see where the maxout point is for USB3 One thing this new 7D update has done for me is I actually explored my camera a bit more today looking through menus etc, and discovered, and have enabled chosing focus points by using the joystick....how cool is that! I know that is not a new feature, but I obviously missed that when I read the manual! I feel so enlightened, yet embarresed at the same time! ![]() On the same token, did you know you can have different AF modes and AF points defined based on your camera orientation? You could have spot AF in portrait on the top point, and center point with expansion in landscape, for example. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | yeah........of course..........who doesn't know that........ 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 13, 2012 11:39 | #1058 pixelbasher wrote in post #14851214 Interesting. All my Ma setting were still in place after the update, just the actual real world results had changed. I better check 2 lenses that need MFA then. I haven't used them since I updated to 2.0, but I am going on vacation next week and will use them then. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | yes it would be interesting to see how you go. As far as I can see in this thread, it's only myself and another guy who has noticed this, but surely there are a lot of other users who have MA'd their lenses beforehand.... 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillBoehme Enjoy being spanked More info | Aug 13, 2012 21:09 | #1060 pixelbasher wrote in post #14854707 yes it would be interesting to see how you go. As far as I can see in this thread, it's only myself and another guy who has noticed this, but surely there are a lot of other users who have MA'd their lenses beforehand.... I won't say that the firmware can't change that, but it would surprise me if it did. Basically, the shift is to compensate for slight hardware tolerance errors by adding a correction bias to the lens focus computation. FWIW, I have not noticed any difference in lens focusing. So far, I have checked out two of my lenses. Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | Aug 13, 2012 21:31 | #1061 Bill Boehme wrote in post #14854841 (I hope that you sense that I am being facetious). LOL, yes I do!, but I was waiting for someone to make a connection with high ISO! 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-dave-m- Senior Member More info | Using Focal my 24-105 consistently MFA's to +1, before and after the 2.0.0 update. The only other lens I had MFA'd with my 7D prior to updating was my Sigma 50, before the update it would plot a predicted MFA over +20 and error out. After the update it MFA'd to +12 on average which was kinda puzzling. I then tried it on my 5DMkII which had MFA'd to +18, the new tests are now showing +9. I figure the change is due to a focus shift or other defect with the Sigma. 5D MkII Gripped | 7D MkII Gripped | 200 f/2.8L | 17-40 f/4L | Σ 24-105 OS f/4 Art | Σ 50 f/1.4 Art | Σ 150-600 OS f/5-6.3 C | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | can't argue with that I must admit, and for the 50mm, it certainly shows a Sigma thing over a 7D change. 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rawshooter Member 89 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 More info | Aug 14, 2012 03:26 | #1064 Wow, love the new upgrades. It might be me but i think the camera weighs less now , can see into the future also has regained that new car smell, my sex life is better and i lost 20 lbs. Thanks Canon. See images below for a before and after of a bird that demonstrates how colors now seem more vibrant than before. blackbird After IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/lookwhatidid/7331023130/ parakeet 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | Aug 14, 2012 03:30 | #1065 rawshooter wrote in post #14855881 Wow, love <snip> how colors now seem more vibrant than before. Does this apply to jpegs or only RAW images? Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1719 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||