Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Jun 2012 (Thursday) 13:01
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Monitor or Calibration equipment?"
Monitor
10
83.3%
Spyder (or other)
2
16.7%

12 voters, 12 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which would you get first?

 
whmeltonjr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,363 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Houston
     
Jun 28, 2012 13:01 |  #1

Forgive me if this is the wrong section. I'm looking at getting a new IPS monitor, but I'm curious if I should get a monitor calibrator first? Currently I edit photos on my mid 2011 13" MacBook pro. I can either get the monitor calibration equipment now, or the a 23" IPS monitor. What would be the more logical choice?im leaning monitor, but if the calibration would be a better choice then I'll go that route.


William | Fuji X-E1 | Fuji X100S | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plawren53202
Member
180 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 28, 2012 13:25 |  #2

Personally, I would go for the calibration first. I can PP photos perfectly well on a calibrated but smaller or cheaper monitor. In contrast, a photo PP'ed on a non-calibrated but big IPS monitor is still possibly going to ultimately come out off color, too dark or light, etc--which will then live with the pic whereever it is displayed, online, printed, etc.

I know the new, bigger monitor is the more fun purchase. But I would go with calibration.


My quite modest little gear list: 50D gripped | 135L | 50 1.4 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28-105 3.5-4.5 | Speedlite 420EX | 2 Yongnuo 460ii | stands, 2 umbrellas, one softbox
http://www.facebook.co​m/TreyLawrencePhotogra​phy (external link)
http://www.zenfolio.co​m/treylawrencephotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whmeltonjr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,363 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Houston
     
Jun 28, 2012 13:26 |  #3

plawren53202 wrote in post #14644732 (external link)
Personally, I would go for the calibration first. I can PP photos perfectly well on a calibrated but smaller or cheaper monitor. In contrast, a photo PP'ed on a non-calibrated but big IPS monitor is still possibly going to ultimately come out off color, too dark or light, etc--which will then live with the pic whereever it is displayed, online, printed, etc.

I know the new, bigger monitor is the more fun purchase. But I would go with calibration.

I could grab an older version of the Spyder and the monitor at the same time, but I wasn't sure if it was even worth getting an older one.


William | Fuji X-E1 | Fuji X100S | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plawren53202
Member
180 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 28, 2012 13:38 |  #4

whmeltonjr wrote in post #14644739 (external link)
I could grab an older version of the Spyder and the monitor at the same time, but I wasn't sure if it was even worth getting an older one.

That would be a question for someone else, as I have only used the Spyder 4 express. I will say, I have been battling white balance and skin tone issues on two different monitors (with my Mpix prints looking different than the on monitor view), and the Spyder 4 express took care of that for me. Older versions may work well too, I just had never used any of them.


My quite modest little gear list: 50D gripped | 135L | 50 1.4 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28-105 3.5-4.5 | Speedlite 420EX | 2 Yongnuo 460ii | stands, 2 umbrellas, one softbox
http://www.facebook.co​m/TreyLawrencePhotogra​phy (external link)
http://www.zenfolio.co​m/treylawrencephotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whmeltonjr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,363 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Houston
     
Jun 28, 2012 13:44 |  #5

Thanks for your advice. I'll wait and see if anyone has used the older ones to compare.


William | Fuji X-E1 | Fuji X100S | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jun 28, 2012 14:46 |  #6

How about an NEC monitor w the built in calibration?


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 28, 2012 16:50 |  #7

Bigger monitor first, unless you do critical color matching work for customers. For your own work factory settings or perhaps one of the software calibration systems with human help is good enough until you get a calibrator.

Spyder 4 express (external link) is about $100 and works well. Be careful which calibrator you choose with an LED screen, Spyder's good, DTP94 not so much.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,437 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Which would you get first?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1363 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.