OK, so I just ordered the 100mm macro, so my funds are drained. I was at Walmart yesterday and they had a SunPak 3000 flash on sale for $50 so I grabbed it. Seems like a good enough flash for me, at least until I can save up for a 430ex...anyhow, here are some questions:
I was shooting some birds at dusk, I had the flash compensation set at "0", should they look like this, or should I drop it down to -1.5 or so? It seems like the pic was taken at midnight or something, so is that too much flash?
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
Night cardinal
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
card
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
card 2
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
feeder 2
This was WITHOUT flash:
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
feeder 3
Then, I wanted to see how far it would illuminate, so I was on my porch and took this across the street:
WITHOUT FLASH
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
far card 2
WITH FLASH (Exp comp at "0")
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
far card
This is all super new to me, and I'm not sure if I'm getting it so far. Is using a flash in a low light situation bound to look like the first cardinal shots? And, am I on the right track with the 'across the street' shots? Why does it look so much more natural? I understand that the light 'weakens' the further it goes, so does that mean that I had way too much flash on the first series?
Thanks...just trying to get a feel for this stuff.
~Steve


