Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 29 Jun 2012 (Friday) 23:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do you download from a card reader?

 
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:16 |  #16

John from PA wrote in post #14652058 (external link)
Be aware that there have been bent pin issues in the camera body because of removal/reinsertion of CF type cards.

But only with a big enough hammer.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:19 |  #17

Tsmith wrote in post #14652184 (external link)
I now I've seen this come up before and not saying its a trivial issue but they are designed to be removed. In the six Canon bodies I've owned over the years I have preformed countless card swaps in the field without never experiencing this. That includes on rugged hiking trails to city streets and the usage of a Card Reader I've about wore out.

Maybe some try and force the CF cards in backwards somehow - :confused:

As for that I routinely use the EOS utility. Just select the images in the Preview Screen and select the ones to transfer from Card Reader to the assigned folder. Its pretty straight forward and simple.

Getting bent pins can certainly happen with cheap card readers that have sloppy or shallow guide rails. It might also happen with extremely cheap cards from fuzzy sources that don't have accurately placed holes with proper guide bevels.

But Canon cameras are not cheap card readers, and nobody should be using cards from fuzzy sources for a number of reasons.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,665 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1266
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Jun 30, 2012 11:35 as a reply to  @ RDKirk's post |  #18

light_pilgrim wrote in post #14651594 (external link)
Folks, I was always downloading from the camera to PC and so I was using EOS Utilities. When images were downloading, there was a small preview icon and I could follow what is currently being downloaded.
I now have a card reader and understood that the way to download is to use the Zoom Browser. There is no preview available though.

What do you use? Is there a way to download via card reader and have a preview?
Thanks.

Why do you need a preview? I import directly into Lightroom and then do my sorting there. I never felt a need for a preview.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 30, 2012 12:29 |  #19

Preeb wrote in post #14652880 (external link)
Why do you need a preview? I import directly into Lightroom and then do my sorting there. I never felt a need for a preview.

I go away and do something else during that time. Like you, I'll do my sorting in an application that thoroughly sorts, scores, does a bit of mass editing, et cetera, at the same time.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raylon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,078 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Plainfield, IL
     
Jun 30, 2012 12:35 |  #20

Preeb wrote in post #14652880 (external link)
Why do you need a preview? I import directly into Lightroom and then do my sorting there. I never felt a need for a preview.

The reason I do is previews is that when my files are loaded into Lightroom, they are all renamed. So when I import, and want a continuous numbering system, not a broken numbering system like what would happen if I imported then deleted.


7D l Canon 70-200 f/4L IS l Canon 85mm f/1.8 l ∑ 17-50 f/2.8 l Canon 50mm f/1.8 II l S95
Full Gear List and Marketplace Feedback
My SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 30, 2012 13:07 |  #21

Raylon wrote in post #14653056 (external link)
The reason I do is previews is that when my files are loaded into Lightroom, they are all renamed. So when I import, and want a continuous numbering system, not a broken numbering system like what would happen if I imported then deleted.

That wouldn't help me much because I'm culling all the way to the final selection going to the client. The point of downloading would only be the first cut.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
casaaviocar
Senior Member
Avatar
887 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Jun 30, 2012 13:15 |  #22

Raylon wrote in post #14653056 (external link)
The reason I do is previews is that when my files are loaded into Lightroom, they are all renamed. So when I import, and want a continuous numbering system, not a broken numbering system like what would happen if I imported then deleted.

I guess like RDKirk, I really don't care what my photo numbering system looks like, as long as I know the event and date, I can find the photo. My download is just the very first step. From there I get down to just a few keepers and several possibilities that I will work on longer.


Rule books are paper they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal -ekg-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Jun 30, 2012 13:21 |  #23

I installed the plug in to be able to see RAW files in windows natively. Then I just drag them from the card reader to the drive.

I have a camera I got back in 2000 that I still use and it has no bent pins, that's 12 years of abuse!
My 10D from 2003 doesn't have bent pins either.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jun 30, 2012 13:45 |  #24

John from PA wrote in post #14652058 (external link)
Be aware that there have been bent pin issues in the camera body because of removal/reinsertion of CF type cards.

But you have to be pretty hamfisted to do it. It normally happens when somebody puts the card in wrong way around and when they feel the extra resistance (because it doesn't really fit that way around) give it a really good shove to force it in. So long as you just slide the card in, and don't force it if you feel resistance, then the pins will be fine.

I must have performed several thousand card removals and insertions by now, and never had a bent pin yet. I know several other photographers who do frequent CF card swapping and none of them have bent a pin either.

Yes, it can happen, but you would have to really force it to do so.


To answer the OPs question, I just slip the card into the computer and open it as a drive, then drag and drop the images where I want them. To see what is what, I just select "large icons" for my view option.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jun 30, 2012 13:58 |  #25

Tsmith, sure they are designed to be removed and reinserted and yes there have been about a 1/2 dozen cases reported in the last 4-6 months of pin damage. Having said that Canon recommends doing the transfer by cable with a direct to computer connection. It remains the users choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 30, 2012 14:25 |  #26

John from PA wrote in post #14653317 (external link)
Tsmith, sure they are designed to be removed and reinserted and yes there have been about a 1/2 dozen cases reported in the last 4-6 months of pin damage. Having said that Canon recommends doing the transfer by cable with a direct to computer connection. It remains the users choice.

That seems pretty specific. Reported where?

And where does Canon make that as a recommendation of operation (as opposed to merely stating how to operate the camera function)?


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,665 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1266
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Jun 30, 2012 14:27 |  #27

Raylon wrote in post #14653056 (external link)
The reason I do is previews is that when my files are loaded into Lightroom, they are all renamed. So when I import, and want a continuous numbering system, not a broken numbering system like what would happen if I imported then deleted.

That means nothing to me. I import, cull, apply keywords. Then the file names don't really even matter any more. I can find what I want with a keyword filter.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jun 30, 2012 14:29 |  #28

RDKirk wrote in post #14652470 (external link)
I wuuuv this program soooooo much!

After having used Downloader Pro for several years, it's clearly the most usefulvautomation program available. Th software takes a little work to figure ut its system of tags, but after that's reasoned out, it takes little effort. It's been in use here with several cameras thst have used several type s of memory cards and several card readers. The software lets you automate the choice of directories and subdirectories and file names. For those who want to control these factors, the software is as good as you can find and is very reasonalby priced.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 30, 2012 14:31 |  #29

The software lets you automate the choice of directories and subdirectories and file names.

Let me add: You can set it to create folders and forward images to them on the fly as it downloads. It can also merge the output from several cameras, meshing them by time sequence and still identifying each frame by its camera.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jun 30, 2012 14:50 |  #30

John from PA wrote in post #14653317 (external link)
Tsmith, sure they are designed to be removed and reinserted and yes there have been about a 1/2 dozen cases reported in the last 4-6 months of pin damage. Having said that Canon recommends doing the transfer by cable with a direct to computer connection. It remains the users choice.

So out of many millions of camera users out there, about 12-15 people a year manage to damage pins? That's a very, very tiny number. I would actually think it is quite a bit higher than that, but still an incredibly insignificant amount, considering the millions of cards that will be removed and reinserted every single day.

Personally, I find the transfer by cable to be far more risky, not to mention a lot slower. It is way too easy to accidentally catch a cable whilst working at your computer, and yank the camera off the desk and onto the floor. I know two people who have done that with cameras, and have managed it myself with an external drive plugged into a USB (yes, it was destroyed - fortunately I had everything backed up properly).

On top of that, there is also the "eggs in one basket" issue, if you never remove cards, as everything is stored on one big capacity card and if that is lost, everything is lost. It happens more often than you might think, it's not just a corrupt card to worry about, but if somebody steals your camera at the end of a weeks vacation and the whole weeks images are on it, you lose the lot. If you use several cards, you lose that days shots at worst, the rest of your vacation memories are safe. I remember doing a shoot a couple of years back on the Farne Islands, one guy I met there was there on the bird photography trip he had been planning to do for years. as we were waiting at the jetty for the boat to come and pick us up, he was dived on by a tern and dropped his camera in the sea - it was lost. His entire days shoot was still in it. If it had happened to me, i would have lost some shots sure, but the several cards in my pockets would still leave me with plenty of great shots.

There is a (very, very small) risk of bending a pin swapping a card, yes. But there are much bigger risks associated with not removing cards.

I have never seen Canon recommend transferring by cable though, simply giving instructions on how to do so if you wish to, using their software package.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,351 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
How do you download from a card reader?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
919 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.