iso 3200
IMG_0349
by gregchamblee, on Flickr
gchmblee Member 186 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | Jul 05, 2012 21:38 | #46 iso 3200 IMG_0349 by gregchamblee, on Flickrwww.gregchamblee.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gchmblee Member 186 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | Jul 05, 2012 21:39 | #47 iso 3200  IMG_7503 by gregchamblee, on Flickrwww.gregchamblee.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cputeq007 Senior Member  585 posts Likes: 18 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Albuquerque, NM More info | Jul 05, 2012 21:57 | #48 Re surface blur / detail masking...sounds a lot like how Topaz Denoise works. OP should check it out, unsure if it will launch from PSE though. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 06, 2012 05:20 | #49 TeamSpeed wrote in post #14676217 Have you tried the surface blur action in photoshop? It can help mask out noise in blurred smooth backgrounds. Thanks for the tip. I have purchased a half-dozen books on PSE, and downloaded a ton of videos from Youtube. I am starting to get better with the software but have a long way to go. IDX Mark III/1DX Mark II/EOS R5- 16-35L f4 IS - 135L - 24-70L f2.8 IS II - 70-200L f2.8 IS II- 100-400 IIL IS - RF 100 Macro f2.8L IS - 85mm 1.4 IS L RF 28-70 f/2 L- Σ 50 1.4 Art - Σ 70 Macro - TC 1.4 II - EF 12/25 II - Profoto A1 - Manfrotto 055CXPRO3/Really Right Stuff BH55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 06, 2012 05:22 | #50 cputeq007 wrote in post #14676621 Re surface blur / detail masking...sounds a lot like how Topaz Denoise works. OP should check it out, unsure if it will launch from PSE though. My 7d arrives tomorrow, so I can contibute to the high ISO insanity  Yes it lauches from PSE, I downloaded the Trial version and it worked well, I've tried several of the de-noising (is that a word?) software and they all have launched so far from PSE 10. IDX Mark III/1DX Mark II/EOS R5- 16-35L f4 IS - 135L - 24-70L f2.8 IS II - 70-200L f2.8 IS II- 100-400 IIL IS - RF 100 Macro f2.8L IS - 85mm 1.4 IS L RF 28-70 f/2 L- Σ 50 1.4 Art - Σ 70 Macro - TC 1.4 II - EF 12/25 II - Profoto A1 - Manfrotto 055CXPRO3/Really Right Stuff BH55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011  More info | Jul 06, 2012 18:00 | #51 How about zero post processing at ISO 6400, 1/80th, f5? Mediocre window lighting...  80% crop  Then after a little spit and shine...  Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
J_R2 Member 115 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: World More info | Jul 06, 2012 18:08 | #52 TeamSpeed wrote in post #14662381 Personally I believe those that don't go past ISO 800 are doing themselves more disservice than good, because there is no reason one cannot get quality large prints at ISO 1600-3200, with little post work. Agree. I can get large quality prints from my old XTi/400D at max ISO. Think shutterspeed instead of ISO. TeamSpeed wrote in post #14662381 The 7D matches the 5D classic at ISO 3200 (or slightly betters it), so if people use ISO 3200 on the 5D, there is no reason to not use it on the 7D. Agree. If the exposure is "correct" they will match. The 5DC however has a very small advantage in terms of latitude in post due to its larger pixels. ( IMO )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2704 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
