In the process of lens shopping, just a quick question , is their an order of quality in the lens ring color?
thanks
Shakeyhand
shakeyhand Hatchling 3 posts Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 13, 2005 14:02 | #1 In the process of lens shopping, just a quick question , is their an order of quality in the lens ring color?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Dec 13, 2005 14:11 | #2 Sort-of: Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightcrawler Senior Member 685 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Omaha, NE More info | Dec 13, 2005 14:12 | #3 |
FlyingPete I am immune More info | jasonhuebert wrote: Do you mean the red ring on Canon L lenses, the gold ring on Sigma EX lenses, and the green ring on Canon DO lenses? I don't know if you can just make a blanket statement about the quality of each kind. The quality varies by lens model. He may have been refering to Canon Lenses only. Peter Lowden.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sorry, I was refering to canon lenses only. Are there sigma lenses that are of equal quality to the "just below the L's". I have a canon EOS A2 and I have been using a tamron 28-300 lens and have never really been happy... It was purely convenience...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Dec 13, 2005 14:54 | #6 The Sigma EX range has some crackers - the 18-50 EX f/2.8, 24-70 EX f/2.8, and 70-200 EX f/2.8 are but three that compare favourably with their Canon counterparts. D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrChad Goldmember 2,815 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Chicagoland More info | I thought Silver was the color used to denote Canon EF-S mount lenses, like the 10-22; 17-85; and 60mm macro. I kaNt sPeL...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPete I am immune More info | MrChad wrote: I thought Silver was the color used to denote Canon EF-S mount lenses, like the 10-22; 17-85; and 60mm macro. Yes that also does, but that is usually the focal length scale, the rings we are refering to are the ones on the end of the lens, which are present on the EF-S lenses as well (except I am only aware of the standard silver ring and the gold USM ring). Peter Lowden.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrChad Goldmember 2,815 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Chicagoland More info | FlyingPete wrote: Yes that also does, but that is usually the focal length scale, the rings we are refering to are the ones on the end of the lens, which are present on the EF-S lenses as well (except I am only aware of the standard silver ring and the gold USM ring). Well I don't think the others (non-L's) matter. As far as I know only the DO's and L's actually change the color of the font on the box accordingly. My USM's don't state USM in gold. And none of my old non-USM had fonts in anything but white either. And since we have all of 2 DO's we may as well think of them as a subset of L's. I'd argue the two we have, have build on par anyway. (Surely the 400 does) I kaNt sPeL...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPete I am immune More info | MrChad wrote: Well I don't think the others (non-L's) matter. As far as I know only the DO's and L's actually change the color of the font on the box accordingly. My USM's don't state USM in gold. And none of my old non-USM had fonts in anything but white either. And since we have all of 2 DO's we may as well think of them as a subset of L's. I'd argue the two we have, have build on par anyway. (Surely the 400 does) I'd say a better rule of thumb in Canon land: price = quality. Nothing is absolute but I will assure you, all of my lenses have been worth the money invested. Box colour? Not sure about that, in fact I know my USM lenses box is white with red and black. My statements refered to a painted ring on the end of each lens jsut before the hood mount. Peter Lowden.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kawter2 Goldmember 2,046 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2004 Location: Orange County, CA More info | Dec 13, 2005 23:44 | #11 if you get L lenses and pro bodies.. all your pics will look pro!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jman13 Cream of the Crop 5,567 posts Likes: 164 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Dec 14, 2005 07:50 | #12 Cool! I should buy my 1.5 year old nephew a 1DsII with an 85 f/1.2L and he'll create masterpieces! Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Dec 14, 2005 08:10 | #13 No, Jordan - you want to get him a 50mm f1.0L to go with the 1DSII - that way he'll create masterpieces in really dark rooms! D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | kawter2 wrote: if you get L lenses and pro bodies.. all your pics will look pro! I must need to send my lenses in for recalibration because it isn't working for me.... hmmm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2251 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||