Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 02 Jul 2012 (Monday) 09:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to Blow out Background?

 
DJHaze596
Goldmember
Avatar
1,441 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 768
Joined May 2012
Location: Florida
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:17 |  #1

I took some pictures of my Brother on his Bike last week, and with Sports Mode dialed in. I was pretty amazed at the results with the 50mm 1.8. I didn't have the 18-55 or 55-250 yet. Well now i do. So my question is, Will the 55-250 Blur out the background more than the 50mm?

I look at MotoGP pictures and LOVE when the background is Blown out like crazy. It's a really nice effect that makes the subject Stand out. I know you need a really good lens to stop the Motion like that. But can the 55-250mm do it?

Here's two pictures from the Shoot, Ones kinda Blurred and the other is barely blurred.

IMAGE: http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/1967/000012fh.jpg

IMAGE: http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/1867/000011yh.jpg

I'm also asking because i want to obviously use Manual Mode. So if anyone can give me some settings, That would be great. I looked up some info last night, So i'm not completely noob on this subject, But he doesn't visit much, So i want to make sure i get it right next time which will be in a few days.

Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV
7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV | Canon R6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:21 |  #2

By blow out, you mean blur out?

There are several things involved that influence this.

1. Focal Length - the longer the focal length, the better.
2. Distance to the subject - the closer you are to the subject, the blurrier the background will be.
3. Aperture - the more light you let in (smaller number=more light) the blurrier the background will be.
4. Sensor size. The larger the sensor, the blurrier the background will be.

So use the longer focal length at 250mm, open it up as wide as it will go (and 5.6 isn't that wide) and get as close as you can to frame him how you want.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:24 |  #3

I look at MotoGP pictures and LOVE when the background is Blown out like crazy.

Remember the pro guys are probably using a lens like a 600mm F/4 or 400mm 2.8. There is a huge difference between 400 2.8 and 250 5.6.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DJHaze596
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,441 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 768
Joined May 2012
Location: Florida
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:25 |  #4

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #14660040 (external link)
By blow out, you mean blur out?

There are several things involved that influence this.

1. Focal Length - the longer the focal length, the better.
2. Distance to the subject - the closer you are to the subject, the blurrier the background will be.
3. Aperture - the more light you let in (smaller number=more light) the blurrier the background will be.
4. Sensor size. The larger the sensor, the blurrier the background will be.

So use the longer focal length at 250mm, open it up as wide as it will go (and 5.6 isn't that wide) and get as close as you can to frame him how you want.

Ok that what i got when i looked it up last night, Now would shooting in a Direction where there's not much in the background help the Blur with the 55-250mm? Meaning if i shoot towards the Bushes & Trees to the left rather than the Apartment Complex to the right, Would that help with the Blur. Because that i think is going to be my next approach.

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #14660050 (external link)
Remember the pro guys are probably using a lens like a 600mm F/4 or 400mm 2.8. There is a huge difference between 400 2.8 and 250 5.6.

Yeah ive seen some Raw files of MotoGP, 400mm, 500mm, etc. I'm just trying to make the best of what i got lol. well hopefully.


Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV
7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV | Canon R6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:29 |  #5

Another thing to try is panning.

If your IS has two selectable modes, switch to mode 2.

Use a slower shutter speed like 1/80th and try to pan with the motorcycle as it moves left to right. The background will blur and the subject will stay sharp if you do it right. It will definitely take a lot of work and you might want a monopod to do it.


That's how I did this. It was like 1/80th at 300mm

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DJHaze596
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,441 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 768
Joined May 2012
Location: Florida
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:32 |  #6

Yeah i was panning with the 50mm, I'm pretty good at it, But i know the 55-250mm is going to be a lot different panning i would assume.


Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV
7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV | Canon R6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Jul 02, 2012 09:48 as a reply to  @ DJHaze596's post |  #7

Thomas... that's a sweet shot.

Haze... it will help you to understand some of the basics of photography.

  • First, pick a still subject and shoot with different focal lengths and aperture settings to see what effect they have on the background. The best way to do this is to pick something simple like a figurine, get up as close as your lens will allow you to focus... and make sure that whatever is behind your figuring is far, far behind.
  • Second, try the same group of tests with your 50mm (focal length fixed of course). With more options to open your aperture wider (small aperture number), you'll see some cool background blur capabilities.
Once you understand the equipment you have, you can make informed decisions about how to capture the type of images you want. Once understanding is nailed, you may then realize what your equipment's limitations are and you can choose what you want to add to your gear.

The combination of these things will improve the amount of background blur: longer focal length, small aperture number (meaning large aperture size), close distance between you and the subject, far distance between the subject and the background.

Panning creates a different type of background blur altogether. Panning effects can be in concert with the combination of things above or done by itself.

Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jul 02, 2012 10:16 |  #8

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #14660040 (external link)
There are several things involved that influence this.

1. Focal Length - the longer the focal length, the better.
2. Distance to the subject - the closer you are to the subject, the blurrier the background will be.
3. Aperture - the more light you let in (smaller number=more light) the blurrier the background will be.
4. Sensor size. The larger the sensor, the blurrier the background will be.

So use the longer focal length at 250mm, open it up as wide as it will go (and 5.6 isn't that wide) and get as close as you can to frame him how you want.

This is essentially correct, but it is worth noting that 1 and 2 pretty much cancel each other out, assuming you frame the subject the same way. You can fit a longer lens to decrease the depth of field (increase the background blur) but then you are framed too tightly on your subject, so you move back to get them all in again, but that increases the depth of field again and you are back to the roughly the same result where DoF is concerned.

The main control over the DoF therefore is aperture, as you can change that without it being cancelled out, although as Thomas points out f/5.6 isn't very wide.

The other way of increasing the background blur, is to keep your subject as far from the backgound as possible, the nearer the background is the less you will be able to throw it out of focus and blur it, so get him somewhere the background is further away.

You may get somebody arguing that number 4 above is incorrect (which it is, technically). The sensor size actually works the other way in that a smaller sensor will actually have shallower DoF, as you have to enlarge the image more. However, in practice, the effect that you see is as Thomas mentions, a larger sensor will result in more background blur assuming that the subject framing is the same. This is not a product of the sensor itself, but because you need to use a longer lens, from the same position, to keep the same framing. Therefore, number 1 above kicks in. The sensor doesn't give you the extra blur, the longer lens does.

As for your question about whether the 50-250 will blur the background more than the 50mm ? I don't think that is going to be the case. Yes, 250mm will give a lot more background blur than 50mm, but you will be stood a lot further back, which will reduce the blur again. As I mentioned above, the true control for DoF is aperture and the 50mm at f/1.8 used in close to the subject, will have shallower DoF than the 250mm used much further away at f/5.6 and so give more pronounced background blur.

So, set the lens to wide open (f/1.8 with the 50mm) and set up somewhere where the background is quite some way away, then get up close and personal with the subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jul 02, 2012 10:36 |  #9

What you mention can involve a combination of equipment and technique. A long focal length, large aperture and long distance to the background can lead to an apparently blurred background.

Example:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D
Lens: 70-200mm
Image Date: 2011-10-08 20:22:40 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 200.0mm
Aperture: f/3.2
Exposure Time: 0.017 s (1/60)
ISO equiv: 1250
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: shutter priority (semi-auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Focal Length: 200.0mm
Aperture: f/2.8
Exposure Time: 0.010 s (1/100)
ISO equiv: 1250
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: shutter priority (semi-auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB


The effect is more dramatic with the much longer lenses used by some photographers at larger tracks.

There's also the "panning" technique of blurring the background through a slow shutter speed.

Example:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Focal Length: 403.0mm
Aperture: f/13.0
Exposure Time: 0.0080 s (1/125)
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: shutter priority (semi-auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

DJHaze596 wrote in post #14660018 (external link)
I took some pictures of my Brother on his Bike last week, and with Sports Mode dialed in. I was pretty amazed at the results with the 50mm 1.8. I didn't have the 18-55 or 55-250 yet. Well now i do. So my question is, Will the 55-250 Blur out the background more than the 50mm?

I look at MotoGP pictures and LOVE when the background is Blown out like crazy. It's a really nice effect that makes the subject Stand out. I know you need a really good lens to stop the Motion like that. But can the 55-250mm do it?

Here's two pictures from the Shoot, Ones kinda Blurred and the other is barely blurred.

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

I'm also asking because i want to obviously use Manual Mode. So if anyone can give me some settings, That would be great. I looked up some info last night, So i'm not completely noob on this subject, But he doesn't visit much, So i want to make sure i get it right next time which will be in a few days.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Owain ­ Glyndwr
Senior Member
528 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Jul 02, 2012 10:46 |  #10

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #14660040 (external link)
By blow out, you mean blur out?

There are several things involved that influence this.

1. Focal Length - the longer the focal length, the better.
2. Distance to the subject - the closer you are to the subject, the blurrier the background will be.
3. Aperture - the more light you let in (smaller number=more light) the blurrier the background will be.
4. Sensor size. The larger the sensor, the blurrier the background will be.

So use the longer focal length at 250mm, open it up as wide as it will go (and 5.6 isn't that wide) and get as close as you can to frame him how you want.

wouldn't it be easier to get bokeh using the 50mm f1.8 wide open than with the 250mm at f5.6?


Bora Da! OG
Canon EOS 600d, EF 24-70L, EF 50mm f/1.8, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Sigma 18-250mm, 430EX II, Lowepro Primus AW, Lowepro Zoom 55AW,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jul 02, 2012 12:20 |  #11

You may get somebody arguing that number 4 above is incorrect (which it is, technically). The sensor size actually works the other way in that a smaller sensor will actually have shallower DoF, as you have to enlarge the image more. However, in practice, the effect that you see is as Thomas mentions, a larger sensor will result in more background blur assuming that the subject framing is the same. This is not a product of the sensor itself, but because you need to use a longer lens, from the same position, to keep the same framing. Therefore, number 1 above kicks in. The sensor doesn't give you the extra blur, the longer lens does.

Yes, the more complicated way of writing it. I was going for simplicity. :)


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Jul 02, 2012 13:12 |  #12

Owain Glyndwr wrote in post #14660360 (external link)
wouldn't it be easier to get bokeh using the 50mm f1.8 wide open than with the 250mm at f5.6?

Sure, but there are other factors. If you shoot 50/1.8 with the subject right up against a wall, you're not going to have as much blur as you would with a 250/5.6 with the background set back 20 ft.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Owain ­ Glyndwr
Senior Member
528 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Jul 02, 2012 13:19 |  #13

Nathan wrote in post #14660997 (external link)
Sure, but there are other factors. If you shoot 50/1.8 with the subject right up against a wall, you're not going to have as much blur as you would with a 250/5.6 with the background set back 20 ft.

true but neither of the OP's shots were done up against a wall. It looks to me like he wasn't shooting wide open. With the distance the bike was from the background, f1.8 should have produced some more noticeable bokeh, and shutter speed could be increased to reduce motion blur on the bike.


Bora Da! OG
Canon EOS 600d, EF 24-70L, EF 50mm f/1.8, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Sigma 18-250mm, 430EX II, Lowepro Primus AW, Lowepro Zoom 55AW,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DJHaze596
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,441 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 768
Joined May 2012
Location: Florida
     
Jul 02, 2012 13:59 |  #14

Owain Glyndwr wrote in post #14661021 (external link)
true but neither of the OP's shots were done up against a wall. It looks to me like he wasn't shooting wide open. With the distance the bike was from the background, f1.8 should have produced some more noticeable bokeh, and shutter speed could be increased to reduce motion blur on the bike.

It was shooting around f4 - f5 in Sports Mode.


Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV
7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV | Canon R6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Owain ­ Glyndwr
Senior Member
528 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Jul 02, 2012 14:08 |  #15

DJHaze596 wrote in post #14661211 (external link)
It was shooting around f4 - f5 in Sports Mode.

use manual mode. try using f1.8 to start with (if the pictures turn out a little soft you may have to stop down to 2.2). Increase your shutter speed to about 1/640 and if need be, increase your iso if the light isn't too good. Try shooting later in the afternoon when you get more horizontal light. Get as close as you can to the subject with them as far away as possible from any background.

disclaimer: I'm a noob too but I tried something similar with this lens.


Bora Da! OG
Canon EOS 600d, EF 24-70L, EF 50mm f/1.8, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Sigma 18-250mm, 430EX II, Lowepro Primus AW, Lowepro Zoom 55AW,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,311 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
How to Blow out Background?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
992 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.