wouldn't it be easier to get bokeh using the 50mm f1.8 wide open than with the 250mm at f5.6?
You want blur right? As long as the shutter speed is slow enough, you will get blur even when shooting at F16.
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Jul 02, 2012 19:08 | #16 Permanent banOwain Glyndwr wrote in post #14660360 wouldn't it be easier to get bokeh using the 50mm f1.8 wide open than with the 250mm at f5.6?
One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Distance to the background and focal lengths can be as important a factor to background blur as aperture.
Focal Length: 50.0mm Aperture: f/2.0 Exposure Time: 0.0010 s (1/1000) ISO equiv: 2500 Exposure Bias: none White Balance: Manual Flash Fired: No (enforced) Orientation: Normal Color Space: sRGB At longer focal lengths and distances, background blur is simpler to achieve, regardless of aperture.
Focal Length: 439.0mm Aperture: f/10.0 Exposure Time: 0.0063 s (1/160) ISO equiv: 100 Exposure Bias: none Metering Mode: Matrix Exposure: shutter priority (semi-auto) White Balance: Auto Flash Fired: No (enforced) Orientation: Normal Color Space: sRGB GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined Photographer: Kevin Lillard Copyright: Kevin Lillard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 04, 2012 00:16 | #18 Either go for the bokeh and shoot f1.8, or the blur the background and shoot 1/50th (or so). Unfortunately you can't have both though. My pictures: John Wilke Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jul 04, 2012 06:12 | #19 Biffbradford wrote in post #14668153 Either go for the bokeh and shoot f1.8, or the blur the background and shoot 1/50th (or so). Unfortunately you can't have both though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OwainGlyndwr Senior Member 528 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2011 Location: Munich, Germany More info | Jul 04, 2012 07:50 | #20 watt100 wrote in post #14668787 Why not use the 55-250IS for a blurred background? you can blur the background using zoom not an action pic but XSi (450D) with 55-250IS - subject about 25 ft from camera ![]() i think the point was that with a stationary subject the blur is bokeh from the background simply being out of focus, whereas if the subject is moving and you pan the shot, the background blurs from the motion, producing two different effects. Bora Da! OG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Otta Senior Member 333 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Buckinghamshire,UK More info | Hi http://www.flickr.com/photos/otta12
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OwainGlyndwr Senior Member 528 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2011 Location: Munich, Germany More info | Jul 06, 2012 03:06 | #22 Otta wrote in post #14675150 Hi Could i make a suggestion ... A nice effect can be achieved by shooting from the back of pickup or estate car . Get your subject to follow , works best on a narrow road with trees or buildings . practice makes perfect and I think you will get a nice sharp wall hanging shot . Hope that helps isn't that just slightly illegal and a little bit dangerous? If the police saw you doing that here you'd be in serious trouble. Bora Da! OG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stayhumble Goldmember 1,328 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Huntington Beach, CA More info | Jul 06, 2012 03:51 | #23 Permanent bandid anyone mention panning, yet? im pretty sure thats what the OP wants. you don't need a fancy lens to blur out a background through panning. There are no rules for a good photograph and there are no excuses for a bad one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScubaDude Goldmember 1,104 posts Likes: 7 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Waveland, MS More info | Jul 06, 2012 03:54 | #24 Permanent banYou could always blur the background in post-processing. Canon [7D & BG-E7 grip] [T1i & BG-E5 grip] [400mm f/5.6L] [50mm f/1.8 II] [18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RustyHammer Senior Member 685 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 Location: New Orleans / New York More info | Jul 06, 2012 09:57 | #25 |
BKoo Member 130 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: New Jersey More info | Jul 06, 2012 13:00 | #26 Owain Glyndwr wrote in post #14661021 true but neither of the OP's shots were done up against a wall. It looks to me like he wasn't shooting wide open. With the distance the bike was from the background, f1.8 should have produced some more noticeable bokeh, and shutter speed could be increased to reduce motion blur on the bike. Owain Glyndwr wrote in post #14661251 use manual mode. try using f1.8 to start with (if the pictures turn out a little soft you may have to stop down to 2.2). Increase your shutter speed to about 1/640 and if need be, increase your iso if the light isn't too good. Try shooting later in the afternoon when you get more horizontal light. Get as close as you can to the subject with them as far away as possible from any background. disclaimer: I'm a noob too but I tried something similar with this lens. +1 to all that. Canon Rebel XS - 18-55mm IS - 75-300mm - 50mm f/1.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Martzart Senior Member 252 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2012 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Jul 06, 2012 15:24 | #27 Outdoors at f1.8 you should be able to get plenty of nice blurry bokeh. Deviant Art ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 992 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||