Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 02 Jul 2012 (Monday) 14:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Difficulty with focus in portrait orientation.

 
Lonestarlady61
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas.
     
Jul 02, 2012 14:29 |  #1

I've improved quite a bit with my focus in landscape orientation but I'm still having problems with portrait orientation. Any ideas why?

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7271/7488936246_a9bf60fa79_b.jpg

Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martini
Member
Avatar
60 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Jul 02, 2012 14:30 |  #2

Personally, I don't see anything wrong.


- martini

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ramon-uk
Senior Member
805 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 343
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Rochester UK
     
Jul 02, 2012 15:09 as a reply to  @ martini's post |  #3

I presume you are talking about the far distance being off focus.

If you let your camera choose the focus point then it will pick the closest thing it finds ( the grass in the front). In this case you should have manually selected a focus point and focussed about a third of the way into the shot, probably about where the rocks are on the right hand side then with a small aperture you will have got it sharp from the foreground to the distance.

This applies to both landscape and portrait orientation so I don't see why you should struggle with either once you have mastered it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Jul 02, 2012 15:36 as a reply to  @ Ramon-uk's post |  #4

As to the orientation, I might lean towards the landscape version, only because I like seeing the lines of the mountains in the distant, the rock on the foreground doesn't seem to be a "star" of the photo, but in portrait , it does take center view....do you have the original without crop?


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,806 posts
Gallery: 512 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13902
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 02, 2012 15:41 |  #5

Ramon-uk wrote in post #14661499 (external link)
IIf you let your camera choose the focus point then it will pick the closest thing it finds ( the grass in the front). In this case you should have manually selected a focus point and focussed about a third of the way into the shot, probably about where the rocks are on the right hand side then with a small aperture you will have got it sharp from the foreground to the distance.

.

/\ This. In horizontal orientation you have more of the scene hitting focus points. In portrait (as framed) you have a dominant subject close so the camera will lock on that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Jul 02, 2012 15:46 |  #6

gonzogolf wrote in post #14661653 (external link)
/\ This. In horizontal orientation you have more of the scene hitting focus points. In portrait (as framed) you have a dominant subject close so the camera will lock on that.

^ agreed


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lonestarlady61
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas.
     
Jul 03, 2012 09:08 |  #7

martini wrote in post #14661334 (external link)
Personally, I don't see anything wrong.

Thanks for your feedback Martini.

Ramon-uk wrote in post #14661499 (external link)
I presume you are talking about the far distance being off focus.

If you let your camera choose the focus point then it will pick the closest thing it finds ( the grass in the front). In this case you should have manually selected a focus point and focussed about a third of the way into the shot, probably about where the rocks are on the right hand side then with a small aperture you will have got it sharp from the foreground to the distance.

This applies to both landscape and portrait orientation so I don't see why you should struggle with either once you have mastered it.

Thanks so much for your input Ramon. I use manual settings and manual focus in all my landscape photos. I also use the LCD screen, that way I can use the grid to find something 1/3 up from the bottom of the frame. It was very windy when I took this photo and that might have contributed to the out of focus distant landscape.

Flo wrote in post #14661629 (external link)
As to the orientation, I might lean towards the landscape version, only because I like seeing the lines of the mountains in the distant, the rock on the foreground doesn't seem to be a "star" of the photo, but in portrait , it does take center view....do you have the original without crop?

Hello Flo, this is the original version. No crop was done at all to this particular photo. I did take quite a few landscape orientation shots but decided to experiment with using theses grasses and rocks for foreground interest.


gonzogolf wrote in post #14661653 (external link)
/\ This. In horizontal orientation you have more of the scene hitting focus points. In portrait (as framed) you have a dominant subject close so the camera will lock on that.

Thanks Gonzogolf. I used manual settings, manual focus and tried to focus 1/3 up from the bottom. I must have missed my focus point by a little bit and I'll keep practicing till I get it right.


Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,806 posts
Gallery: 512 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13902
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 03, 2012 09:47 |  #8

Lonestarlady61 wrote in post #14664694 (external link)
Thanks Gonzogolf. I used manual settings, manual focus and tried to focus 1/3 up from the bottom. I must have missed my focus point by a little bit and I'll keep practicing till I get it right.

I'm not a big fan of manual focus using the modern DLSR. They really arent built well for the purpose. I started my photo career well before autofocus so its not that I dont love manual focus, but the viewfinders are poorly designed for the purpose.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jul 03, 2012 12:06 |  #9

Landscapes shot in portrait mode give a feeling of confining space. Landscape orientation opens that up and makes for a more pleasing shot IMO.

So the solution for me is don't shoot landscapes in portrait mode unless you have a specific subject you are trying to compose for.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lonestarlady61
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas.
     
Jul 03, 2012 13:10 |  #10

Titus213 wrote in post #14665508 (external link)
Landscapes shot in portrait mode give a feeling of confining space. Landscape orientation opens that up and makes for a more pleasing shot IMO.

So the solution for me is don't shoot landscapes in portrait mode unless you have a specific subject you are trying to compose for.

I know exactly what you mean Titus and I feel the same way but a few people have encouraged me to try it out so I did. You might prefer an image like this one:

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7267/7488938462_6249d9eb58_b.jpg

Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lonestarlady61
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas.
     
Jul 03, 2012 13:11 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #14664884 (external link)
I'm not a big fan of manual focus using the modern DLSR. They really arent built well for the purpose. I started my photo career well before autofocus so its not that I dont love manual focus, but the viewfinders are poorly designed for the purpose.

Thanks so much for your comment Gonzogolf and I do know what you mean but the method I'm using seems to work for me 90% of the time anyway.


Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AE_Photography
Member
Avatar
179 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: CT
     
Jul 04, 2012 00:34 |  #12

You could also try a higher aperture to have more DOF as well. I don't see the camera settings, so I do not know what you shot at, but obviously the higher you go up, the more focused background you will achieve.


Andrew Johnson / Owner
https://www.facebook.c​om …w-Johnson/33615570653492​9 (external link)
Camera Bodies:Canon MKIII 1D / Canon 6D
Lenses: 50mm 1.8 / 24-105mm F4 / 70-200mm 2.8 IS L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jul 04, 2012 09:50 |  #13

Lonestarlady61 wrote in post #14665790 (external link)
I know exactly what you mean Titus and I feel the same way but a few people have encouraged me to try it out so I did. You might prefer an image like this one:

Now stitch an image on each side of that and you have a great landscape.:D


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,087 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Difficulty with focus in portrait orientation.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Bella toye
1222 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.