Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 02 Jul 2012 (Monday) 23:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Firefox and wide gamut - images sometimes oversaturated

 
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,736 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 199
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jul 02, 2012 23:58 |  #1

Recently I've moved to a wide gamut monitor and noticed that while viewing photos using Firefox on POTN many of them look very over-saturated and overly contrasty. My monitor is calibrated with Native (full) gamut. Most of the images (but not all) that have this problem seem to be hosted on Photobucket.

If I save the same image onto my computer and view it with Photoshop it looks fine.

It looks like Firefox (I'm using 13.0.1) has a problem handling images that don't have an embedded ICC profile. However, it turns out that this is a known "problem" and someone has made an add-on that fixes the behavior. The add-on is called "Color Management" and lets you enable color management for ALL images instead of the default which is only images with embedded ICC profiles. After installing it I'm now able to view all images on POTN as the poster intended them to be seen :) If you keep your calibrated system as wide gamut and you use Firefox I recommend trying this out. Here's a link to the add-on: https://addons.mozilla​.org …x/addon/color-management/ (external link)

Here is a screen capture of the "Options" screen for the Color Management add-on:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604029.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604029) © Bob_A [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 03, 2012 10:26 |  #2

More, for those who are interested: why does my JPEG image appears as different in other image viewers ?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,736 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 199
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jul 03, 2012 23:11 |  #3

Thanks for the contribution Frank.

Moving to a wide gamut monitor calibrated in Native (full) gamut has a few challenges, but so far most are easy to deal with:

1. Windows desktop isn't color managed, but this is dealt with easily by using an aRGB image

2. Windows Media Player and Media Center aren't color managed. Quicktime is, but it's not a great program since you can't set it to always be on top of open windows. A better solution is to download Media Player Classic Home Cinema from Sourceforge and turn color management on. Works great.

3. As mentioned in my first post, Firefox isn't fully color managed "out of the box" and can't deal with untagged images. To turn on full color management you either have to change settings manually or use the "Color Management" add-on.

4. Avoid using IE9 since its approach to color management is half baked giving poor results on a wide gamut monitor.


Microsoft Office is supposed to be color managed, but so far I'm not happy with the results. When I paste an sRGB or aRGB image with ICC profiles intact into a Word document they look identical but for both the colors are off (too red when compared to Photoshop). On the other hand Windows Picture Viewer displays images identical to PS.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,799 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Firefox and wide gamut - images sometimes oversaturated
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1400 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.