Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Jul 2012 (Wednesday) 16:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help removing shadow noise from night sky

 
armis
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 04, 2012 16:59 |  #1

Hey all,

I'm trying to process a shot of the Milky Way, except I didn't know what I was doing and I guess my original shot pool wasn't large enough, and they were all taken ISO 3200+. The composite image looks nice enough, but I have unacceptable amounts of shadow noise, and I don't know how to process it out. Any hints?

I'm talking about the blue-ish, green-ish and purple-ish hues you see in the shadows there in that 100% crop, that just appear as random splotches of color. The closest I've got is through heavy de-noising but I have to push it up so far it blurs the stars themselves too, and leaves some splotches behind anyway. I tried something like a reverse high pass filter process (the kind you use to smoothen skin) but it didn't really work.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604261.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604261) © armis [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 04, 2012 17:25 |  #2

You didn't say what you're using for editing, but here's an attempt using Photoshop Elements. All I did was add a Levels adjustment layer and push the black point way up to the right. Since all you want in this image is either black or white, that works pretty well, I think.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604266.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604266) © Rimmer [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 04, 2012 17:31 |  #3

Nah, actually I tried that too. It seems the milky way isn't that well defined so while that works OK in the outer areas, it makes the core look weird. Also, the space between stars being pitch-black seems rather unnatural. Thanks for trying though :).


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 04, 2012 17:41 |  #4

Interesting! Thanks for the feedback. Hope you get it figured out so we can see your image.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 04, 2012 22:12 |  #5

I thought Rimmer's job came out quite well, considering what there was to work with. The biggest problem with your shot was the "blotch" of noise on the left side that pretty much wipes out the fainter actual stars from showing through.

The question is, did you take other photos of the scene so that you could stake/blend them for noise subtraction? If not, well, maybe a combination of what Rimmer did with some cloning to fill in that "empty space"?

I'm not an astrophotographer, so I'm just taking stabs in the dark...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jul 04, 2012 22:34 |  #6

I'd just select the color ranges you don't want or that you want to reduce, then just paint those colors out with a mask and some brushing.

I'd normally do this in Aperture 3, which allows you to spot pick a color, and then you can reduce the saturation of just that color channel... then just use the brush tool to paint the less saturated (or darkened) effect into the areas of the image where you want it.

An example is attached.. I basically painted in the color removal on the left side only, so you can see the difference.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604315.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604315) © Todd Lambert [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 05, 2012 02:36 |  #7

tonylong wrote in post #14671756 (external link)
I thought Rimmer's job came out quite well, considering what there was to work with. The biggest problem with your shot was the "blotch" of noise on the left side that pretty much wipes out the fainter actual stars from showing through.

The question is, did you take other photos of the scene so that you could stake/blend them for noise subtraction? If not, well, maybe a combination of what Rimmer did with some cloning to fill in that "empty space"?

The lighter patch there you mean? That's actually a cloud passing through (though it does have its own noise issues, but since it blocks the stars I can probably paint over/ blur/ denoise like its 1999).

Here's the thing: that image you see is already the composite of 7 exposures and one dark frame (merged with DSS), and one pass of Noise Ninja. However, I didn't know about DSS when I took those shots, so they're all between 10-20 seconds, f/2.8 and ISO 3200. Had I known about that technique beforehand, I'd just have taken some 30 5-second shots at lower ISOs, but now it's too late to go back because I'm about 10,000 miles away from that place :).

stabs in the dark...

I see what you did there... ;)


@Todd: that's already a pretty good step, thanks! :) You've taken out the blue hues, I assume by spot picking one of the reddish areas you could do the same to the reds. Some of the stars are colored though; will that technique only impact the colors as dark as (or close to) the one you picked, or the entire channel including the highlights?


edit: I'll try to post a WIP of the entire shot just to give you guys an idea.


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john29
Member
31 posts
Joined Jul 2012
     
Jul 05, 2012 02:51 |  #8

I'd just select the color ranges you don't want or that you want to reduce, then just paint those colors out with a mask and some brushing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JAbberwocky
Senior Member
373 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: SF Yay Area
     
Jul 05, 2012 03:00 |  #9

I think we all knows what it feels like to take a shot and then later discover it is near usable. I think maybe this is not salvageable, this probably should not have been shot at ISO 3200, and there seems to be a bit of coma from the lens, but here's a quick stab anyways.

I've never used noise ninja, but most noise software lets you filter out chroma noise and luminance noise at separate strengths. In this case, the image needs reductions of both types. Even after that, there's still a lot of color splotches. That's the first image.

You can further tweak it by desaturating the red blue and magenta chanels a bit and increasing the contrast to get some more definition to the stars, but even then I don't know if I would can the image usable.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604337.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604337) © JAbberwocky [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604338.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604338) © JAbberwocky [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Photography is not defined by what gear you own.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ohata0
Senior Member
561 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jul 05, 2012 08:53 |  #10

Here's my attempt.

I used noiseware to do some noise reduction, I separated the chroma and the luminance NR so that I could use the 2 at different opacities (I tend to go overboard w/ the noise reduction and then use the opacity to scale back to taste and/or mask out parts I want to keep detail).

I also darkened it a little with curves but put an anchor up at the bright corner to keep the stars bright.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604363.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604363) © ohata0 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jul 05, 2012 09:34 as a reply to  @ ohata0's post |  #11

armis wrote in post #14672501 (external link)
@Todd: that's already a pretty good step, thanks! :) You've taken out the blue hues, I assume by spot picking one of the reddish areas you could do the same to the reds. Some of the stars are colored though; will that technique only impact the colors as dark as (or close to) the one you picked, or the entire channel including the highlights?


edit: I'll try to post a WIP of the entire shot just to give you guys an idea.


Yes, you can just keep adding spot colors to remove as you need. I only did one (blue). This can be set with sensitivity, so that only the problem color is removed, and of course, if you're brushing it in, it's easy to control.

john29 wrote in post #14672538 (external link)
I'd just select the color ranges you don't want or that you want to reduce, then just paint those colors out with a mask and some brushing.

What, is there an echo in here? :p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 05, 2012 09:45 |  #12

I fiddled with it a little more and think I've got something decent. Desaturation in the areas where the star field is less dense, a little more noise reduction followed by an overlay of uniform noise (got the idea off somewhere - surprisingly, it does make the gradients look smoother) and some more random attempts at stuff. Will post new crop in a few.


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 07, 2012 12:44 |  #13

armis wrote in post #14673426 (external link)
I fiddled with it a little more and think I've got something decent. Desaturation in the areas where the star field is less dense, a little more noise reduction followed by an overlay of uniform noise (got the idea off somewhere - surprisingly, it does make the gradients look smoother) and some more random attempts at stuff. Will post new crop in a few.

A little late, but here goes:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/1/LQ_604765.jpg
Image hosted by forum (604765) © armis [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jul 07, 2012 12:46 |  #14

Looks good, much better. 8-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 07, 2012 13:42 |  #15

Thanks! You can see the full shot over here :).


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,962 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Help removing shadow noise from night sky
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1456 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.