ewheeler20 wrote in post #14681738
the 50 1.8 is way better of a lens than the 55-250... Using the 55-250 on a dslr will make your images look like they were taken with a point and shoot.
I have had my 50 1.8 for a year now with zero problems. Yes, it's light weight but big deal... I could not care less that a lens "feels like a toy".
the 50 1.8 is way better of a lens than the 55-250... Using the 55-250 on a dslr will make your images look like they were taken with a point and shoot.
I have had my 50 1.8 for a year now with zero problems. Yes, it's light weight but big deal... I could not care less that a lens "feels like a toy".
Yep, most point and shoots take shots like these..
photo
by slcko, on Flickr
photo
by slcko, on Flickr
IMG_6661
by slcko, on Flickr
IMG_6614 cropped
by slcko, on Flickr
IMG_6658
by slcko, on Flickr
IMG_6350_DxO2
by slcko, on Flickr
moon100crop
by slcko, on FlickrNo idea what you are talking about really.
To the first question, if you can I would also highly suggest the 18-55 IS, and the 55-250 IS as starter lenses. The 55-250, as you can see from some of my examples, also has a pretty high magnification factor and serves as a decent poor man's macro lens.
