I don't do HDR very often. I am open to critique.
fogboundturtle Senior Member 735 posts Likes: 36 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Jul 07, 2012 22:27 | #1 I don't do HDR very often. I am open to critique. Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70D, Canon EF 24-105L, Tamron 150-600mm, Tamron 70-200 F2.8 DI VC USD, Sony A7r, Sony FE 55mm F1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NatureNut Goldmember  1,366 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2012 Location: NY More info | Jul 07, 2012 22:33 | #2 Looks fairly natural for HDR. I like the rich colors. Adam - Upstate NY:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GaryMcDuffie Goldmember  3,022 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsbluff, NE USA More info | Jul 08, 2012 23:08 | #3 Nice photo, but it would help to see the zero image to be able to see what HDR did for it. Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 09, 2012 17:49 | #4 Gary McDuffie wrote in post #14690064  Nice photo, but it would help to see the zero image to be able to see what HDR did for it.  Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70D, Canon EF 24-105L, Tamron 150-600mm, Tamron 70-200 F2.8 DI VC USD, Sony A7r, Sony FE 55mm F1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewEnglandPhotographer Goldmember 2,343 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jul 09, 2012 18:18 | #5 This photo does not warrant HDR treatment. There's that not that great of varying lighting going on, so any HDR processing is going to look very unnatural and out of place. It's just as important to use the correct photo as it is to process it properly. Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NatureNut Goldmember 1,366 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2012 Location: NY More info | Jul 09, 2012 19:18 | #6 I like how the HDR brought out more of the wood texture. Might have been able to do it with other PP methods, but still nice. Adam - Upstate NY:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imjason Goldmember 1,667 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Jul 09, 2012 19:30 | #7 I like the photo and the processing. However, based on your 0 Ev, the photo is not an HDR photo. the Dynamic range actually was less in the processed photo than the original. Colors and contrast is more attractive in the process photo tho. So OP, if you like the tools used to create HDR photos to process your photos, then go for it. But just be sure if youre trying to create an HDR photo, make sure the final image has high dynamic range. If not, its just a normal photo. Canon gear: EOS M, Canonet QL17, SX230HS, S95, SD1200IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 787 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
