Has any one got any examples using a G6 in poor light at 400 isa
I have a G3 and it is very poor at that speed.
Do I wait for the next G series camera or settle for a G6.
(or I could go Olympus E500)
Terry
Terrywoodenpic Senior Member  869 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Saddleworth England More info | Dec 14, 2005 14:57 | #1 Has any one got any examples using a G6 in poor light at 400 isa Terry_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BryanBedell Senior Member  377 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Chicago, IL, USA More info | Dec 14, 2005 16:04 | #2 Terrywoodenpic wrote: Has any one got any examples using a G6 in poor light at 400 isa I have a G3 and it is very poor at that speed.y The G6 probably isn't a lot better, I pretty much avoid shooting at 400 if at all possible.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kraterz Member 233 posts Joined Aug 2001 More info | My G6 has absolutely horrendous noise at ISO-400. I'd never shoot at that speed. Even 200 is noisy. 100 and 50 are awesome though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndreyD Senior Member  708 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Moscow, Russia More info | Dec 19, 2005 07:57 | #4 Terrywoodenpic wrote: Has any one got any examples using a G6 in poor light at 400 isa I have a G3 and it is very poor at that speed. Do I wait for the next G series camera or settle for a G6. (or I could go Olympus E500) Terry This is ISO 400, there was almost no light at all ... Andrey
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Terrywoodenpic THREAD STARTER Senior Member 869 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Saddleworth England More info | AndreyD wrote: This is ISO 400, there was almost no light at all ... http://ff01.photofile.ru …f1/534698/10806563LPA.jpg  That is certainly better than I can get on a G3 at 400 ISO Terry_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
twalker294 Senior Member  665 posts Joined Jan 2002 Location: Louisiana, USA More info | Dec 24, 2005 14:59 | #6 Any small sensor digital is going to have the same problem. The picture posted is both a small version and has very little shadow areas which is where the noise shows up most. The G6 is no better than the G3. Todd Walker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndreyD Senior Member 708 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Moscow, Russia More info | Terrywoodenpic wrote: That is certainly better than I can get on a G3 at 400 ISO Have you used any noise supressing software. Terry No, I did it without any noise supressing software, shoot in RAW and develop, little bit unsharp. I just exprerimenting if in extreem situation I can use ISO 400, now I know that I can. Andrey
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1787 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
