Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Jul 2012 (Wednesday) 08:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is it best to clean your cameras censor by yourself or get it done professionally?

 
5W0L3
Senior Member
998 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jul 11, 2012 08:49 |  #1

Also anyone know how much approximately would someone charge to do it professionally?

What tools are best to use to do it yourself?


Manav
5D III x 2 (gripped) | 35L | 85L II | 100L | 24-70mm IIL | 70-200mm IIL | Some strobes & some speedlights.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Jul 11, 2012 09:25 |  #2

I would never clean the sensor myself as there is too much damage that can take place if something goes wrong. If and when the sensor gets so bad that it has to be cleaned, that's when I send it in and have someone else take liability.

**Edit** I say never, but there may come a day when I change my mind because of the costs of someone else doing it are too high..... LOL So if in the future I post a thread about me cleaning my own sensor, and you're (whoever) digging up as much info as possible to make me look like a fool...... Well this is my waiver!


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
regatta
Senior Member
342 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: St. Pete Beach, Florida
     
Jul 11, 2012 09:26 |  #3

I do it myself with eclipse swabs and solution. It's quick and easy but usually takes me like 5 or 6 swabs per cleaning.


Sam
7D and saving for 600mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 11, 2012 09:34 |  #4

no hesitation. Eclipse fluid and pec pads.

http://www.copperhilli​mages.com/index.php?pr​=tutorials (external link)


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Jul 11, 2012 10:06 |  #5

I use Visible Dust products (magnification loupe, arctic butterfly, swabs, sensor cleaning fluid). The only Visible Dust product I don't like is their blower. The large Giotto Rocket Blower is my preference there. Visible Dust products are very expensive though; I'm not sure how many professional cleanings it would take for it to start paying off.

The lighted magnification loupe is a necessity for me, to actually see the dust clearly on the sensor. I initially start with the Rocket Blower and see if I can dislocated the dust that way. Then comes the Arctic Butterfly brush. Finally, stubborn dust might need to be swabbed off using the Visible Dust sensor cleaning solution and their sensor swabs (get the swabs perfectly sized for your sensor). Using those materials here are my two words of advice: 1. Always take a light touch; 2. Touch the sensor only; avoid contact with the sides of the sensor compartment as there may be oils or other debris that might contaminate your sensor cleaning materials). You're never actually touching the sensor, but a film that's over the sensor.

I've cleaned my sensor several times. It's very safe and easy (if you use high quality materials like Visible Dust). There are even video lessons on how to do it at Kelby Training.

I suppose it's possible I could do some damage to the sensor, but every time I walk around with the camera I'm putting it at a much greater risk (like the risk of falling and dropping the camera on a hard rock or something). So, put things in perspective: just using the camera is riskier than carefully cleaning its sensor using top-grade sensor cleaning products.

Here's a link by a Nikon user, but it's exactly the same for Canon cameras too:
http://www.bythom.com/​cleaning.htm (external link)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwp721
Senior Member
771 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Jul 11, 2012 10:19 |  #6

Been cleaning my dSLR's for about 6 years now. Eclipse and swabs. Would never consider being without my camera for a job that only takes 15 minutes and less than $10 at the most....

http://www.photosol.co​m …?idproduct=2&id​category=4 (external link)
http://www.photosol.co​m …?idproduct=4&id​category=2 (external link)

Can be done with two swabs with an understanding that 99% clean is good enough.

Being a rocket scientist.... not necessary. Having patience & common sense... mandatory.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monet33
Member
63 posts
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jul 11, 2012 10:33 |  #7

you can send it to canon service center in Irvine CA to clean for about $30 or take it there yourself if you live in southern california.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmnelson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,286 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 11, 2012 10:39 |  #8

I've cleaned my 1Ds ii before and I was really scared, but it wasn't nearly as bad as I thought.

That said, I don't know that I got the technique quite right because there was less sensor dust when I was done, but a few spots clearly remained. I have been tempted to take it in to a camera shop and pay for cleaning by someone who really knows what they're doing, but haven't got around to it yet. In my case the spots are not that visible under most circumstances and when they are obvious they are easy to correct.


Gear | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pssc
Member
94 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Riverside, CA/ Lake Havasu, AZ
     
Jul 11, 2012 10:51 |  #9

Canon Irvine is $30. I took a camera to a local shop and it was $65. The last time I took my 1dM3 to Canon, it wouldn't work when I got it back. It acted like water got inside the camera. I notified canon, but the situation cleared up in a day and it has been good to go. Since then, I clean my own sensors. I use the Eclipse copperhill system.

Cheers, Steve


1dm4, 5Dm2, and a bunch of other stuff.
www.sscphoto.zenfolio.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Jul 11, 2012 13:09 |  #10

koala yummies wrote in post #14702194 (external link)
It's better to take an exposure to ensure the dust is gone, as opposed to physically looking at the sensor, as the output image is what you are concerned with.

It's not about doing one as "opposed" to the other. It's better to do both. Physically examining the sensor during the cleaning process offers a preliminary confirmation. Once the sensor appears clean, then go take an exposure (out of focus sky/wall @ f/22) as a final confirmation that it's clean.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dandan1
Goldmember
1,223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
     
Jul 11, 2012 13:12 |  #11

AlanU wrote in post #14701549 (external link)
no hesitation. Eclipse fluid and pec pads.

http://www.copperhilli​mages.com/index.php?pr​=tutorials (external link)


Ditto.

It's so easy and feels good knowing that you can clean the sensor yourself (if you're a DIY kinda person). Then when you pull up the images at full res you will be happy at how spotless the images are.

Also, there are several YouTube videos that walk you thru this process.


ISOlution|Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5x5 ­ photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,156 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 11, 2012 14:32 |  #12

You should at least know how to do it and have the equipment on hand.
I got some trash on a sensor in the middle of an outdoor shot. I got in my car (away from the wind) and using a dslr brush and magnifier I was able to get the sensor clean and resume work.


My firearms review site. http://rangehot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Jul 11, 2012 15:01 |  #13

koala yummies wrote in post #14702965 (external link)
Sure, you can do that. There's really no need to though if you just check the actual output of the sensor once it has been cleaned. Leaving the shutter open while physically looking at the sensor with the camera open increases the possibility of yet further dust after cleaning. Slapping a lens on and checking the output does not.

That's like vacuuming a room blindfolded and then taking a picture to see if you did a good job. If it works for you, great. But, cleaning my sensor and then spending a solid 3-4 seconds examining it through loupe works very well for me. ;)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PM01
Goldmember
1,188 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: USA!
     
Jul 11, 2012 15:01 as a reply to  @ post 14702965 |  #14

As long as you are careful, you can clean the sensor cover by yourself. Just don't apply too much pressure on the cover glass. The ones in the 1D mark II and II n are fairly thick, around 3.5mm. But the ones used in the Mark III, IV and the 1DX are only 0.3mm thick. They shatter quite easily if there is too much pressure.

One of my students that I taught (she shoots Nikon) didn't check to make sure that the pad was clean. She blamed it on the beach shoot (lots of sand obviously) and swore up and down that sand blew on the sensor while she changed the lens. Shutter travel is oriented to the shortest travel. The ugly scratches and gouges were on the long side of travel. Guess she wasn't really listening to me at all!

One of the reasons why the newer Canon models use a much thinner cover slip is due to the ultrasonic cleaner built in. Much easier to move a 0.3mm thick cover than it is to move a 3.5mm thick one.

Take your time, use as little pressure as possible and make sure the pad is FREE OF GRIT and DIRT before you start!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wayne.robbins
Goldmember
2,062 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 11, 2012 15:19 |  #15

I never clean my censor ; they can usually take a shower all by themselves. Besides, they are usually critics- and I don't care for critics either.


EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100
Fond memories: Rebel T1i, Canon 18-55 IS, Canon 55-250 IS, 18-135 IS (Given to a good home)...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,224 views & 0 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Is it best to clean your cameras censor by yourself or get it done professionally?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2622 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.