Hello,
I was wondering how much more size (diameter?) the IS system adds to the non IS version of the lens?
Would anyone happen to have a shot of both of them side by side?
thanks for the info
billinvegas Member  119 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Las Vegas, NV More info | Jul 11, 2012 12:27 | #1 Hello, 5D MkIII / 7D Gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MadlyAlive Senior Member  335 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Jul 11, 2012 12:28 | #2 This may help you out: http://www.the-digital-picture.com ….8-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx 5D Mark III Gripped ~ 7D Gripped ~ EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM ~ EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM ~ EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM ~ EF 50mm f/1.8 II ~ 550EX ~ 600EX-RT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks for that link! 5D MkIII / 7D Gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Very little difference in size. I sent my non IS f4 back to B&H after about 30 days and got the IS version. Best move I ever made. Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/maggiesguy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chenga732 Senior Member 465 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 More info | Jul 11, 2012 17:23 | #5 I love my 70-200 f4 is. It takes wonderful sharp pics. Xsi|24-105mm f4.0|70-200mm f4.0|85mm f.18
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GwagDesigns Senior Member  299 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Seattle, Washington More info | Jul 11, 2012 17:32 | #6 This should help you as far as size goes, not much difference, but weight will be more:
[7D] - [GF1 w/14mm f2.5] - 70-200f4L | 50mm f1.2L | Sigma 10-20 | Sigma 105 f2.8 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8[U]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
greenjeans Goldmember  More info | Jul 11, 2012 17:37 | #7 I have the IS version and really like it except the IS is really noisy. I debated a long time between IS and non-IS and have no regrets. Great lens. 6D, 6DII, 70D, 80D, R10, RP, Lumix DC-FZ80 and a bag full of lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wayne.robbins Goldmember 2,062 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | Jul 11, 2012 18:11 | #8 If you are ultimately looking for f/2.8, but cannot afford the Canon model, why not consider the Sigma 70-200 OS ? Same price range, f/2.8... EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bob_r Goldmember More info | Jul 11, 2012 20:49 | #9 They are the same physical size (3" X 6.8") but the IS version weighs 1.8 oz. more (26.8 oz. vs. 25 oz.). Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 609 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
