Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Jul 2012 (Thursday) 03:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Amazingly basic question time

 
armis
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 12, 2012 03:36 |  #1

Does the plane of focus change when you zoom in or out? (on a zoom lens, obviously)

Muchas gracias!


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jul 12, 2012 03:41 |  #2

If you're asking if a zoom lens will hold focus throughout the entire zoom range, the answer is...

Not unless it's "Parfocal" and 99% of Canon lenses for still cameras are not.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 12, 2012 03:49 |  #3

Ah, so basically I can't manually focus my 24-70 at 70mm with maxed out live view, then zoom back out to 24? Bummer, but thanks :).


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrushka
"all warm and fuzzy"
Avatar
3,735 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Oct 2007
Location: OC, CA
     
Jul 12, 2012 03:59 |  #4
bannedPermanently

If you can't get a sharp shot using the 10x live view at 24mm - you may have another issue?


http://www.paradigmpho​tographyoc.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 12, 2012 04:53 |  #5

I haven't actually tried it yet, just wondered. For star photography, I thought maybe the extra zoom could come in handy.


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnB57
Goldmember
1,511 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Holmfirth, Yorkshire, England
     
Jul 12, 2012 05:21 |  #6

armis wrote in post #14705601 (external link)
I haven't actually tried it yet, just wondered. For star photography, I thought maybe the extra zoom could come in handy.

Unless you mean celebrity photography, setting the focus ring to infinity should be ok at any focal length. Most stellar objects are quite a long way away. Quite a lot of them are even further than that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 12, 2012 07:33 |  #7

JohnB57 wrote in post #14705638 (external link)
Unless you mean celebrity photography, setting the focus ring to infinity should be ok at any focal length. Most stellar objects are quite a long way away. Quite a lot of them are even further than that.

Yeah, you know, that's what I thought too. The first thing I realized when I gave it a try is that it doesn't work: setting the ring at infinity is actually too far, you need to focus a little before that. Either that, or maybe my distance scale is off: regardless, infinity focus didn't work for me.


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jul 12, 2012 09:02 |  #8

JohnB57 wrote in post #14705638 (external link)
Unless you mean celebrity photography, setting the focus ring to infinity should be ok at any focal length. Most stellar objects are quite a long way away. Quite a lot of them are even further than that.

Setting the ring to infinity is a good way of getting nothing in focus, as that actually makes the lens focus "beyond" infinity.

Armis, look up hyperfocal distance and just use that as a guide as to where to adjust your focus ring, or focus on something really far away during the day so you can see where you need to focus later at night.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,438 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 12, 2012 09:15 |  #9

Yeah, you know, that's what I thought too. The first thing I realized when I gave it a try is that it doesn't work: setting the ring at infinity is actually too far, you need to focus a little before that. Either that, or maybe my distance scale is off: regardless, infinity focus didn't work for me.

If you mean setting the focal point as far away as it will go, that is not infinity focus. Most lenses are designed to go beyond it. This is marked on the distance scale on most lenses that still have them.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigSky
Senior Member
745 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Billings, Montana
     
Jul 12, 2012 09:41 |  #10

JohnB57 wrote in post #14705638 (external link)
Most stellar objects are quite a long way away. Quite a lot of them are even further than that.

Holy crap that made me laugh.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnB57
Goldmember
1,511 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Holmfirth, Yorkshire, England
     
Jul 12, 2012 09:54 |  #11

I was being a little tongue in cheek, but if you use the focus scale and match the appropriate FL line with the vertical part of the elongated "L", that's infinity focus - it works on all my lenses.

Thus...

IMAGE: http://i985.photobucket.com/albums/ae334/SJBarra/Focusscale.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 13, 2012 03:32 |  #12

JohnB57 wrote in post #14706397 (external link)
I was being a little tongue in cheek, but if you use the focus scale and match the appropriate FL line with the vertical part of the elongated "L", that's infinity focus - it works on all my lenses.

No, I get that - but on my 24-70, when I tried it, it didn't work. Honest. I didn't throw the focus ring as far as it'd go, just lined it up with the infinity marker, and took a test shot, and it was blurry.

I also tried hyperfocal focusing (somewhat familiar with the concept since I got my manual 14mm lens :p), which I guessed was between 5-10 metres (no calculator with me). I placed the ring at 10m, took a test shot - blurry. That's the point where I went "oh screw this " and ended up taking a few shots, turning the focus ring a little bit every time, and found the sweet spot through trial and error (although having the presence of mind of using live view would have saved a lot of trouble).

I guess my distance scale must be off.


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Jul 13, 2012 04:54 as a reply to  @ armis's post |  #13

^ armis: Did you turn off AF, before setting infinity focus? If you didn't, AF will just reacquire focus(and probably not where you want) again when you 1/2 push the shutter button.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Jul 13, 2012 05:11 |  #14

armis wrote in post #14710234 (external link)
I guess my distance scale must be off.

No, I don't think so. The problem is that stars are the toughest test of focussing because they're very bight points of light.

Focussing at the hyperfocal distance is fine in most cases. But it's only objects at the hyperfocal distance that will actually be in focus. Objects in front and behind that distance aren't in focus - they're just acceptably close to being in focus. But that word 'acceptably' applies to normal shooting - where you're not going to notice that the leaves on a tree a mile away are slightly blurred.

But stars are incredibly demanding targets - especially if you're going to be looking at them zoomed in to 100%. So you really do need them to be on the plane of focus (or acceptably close, where what is acceptable is a lot closer than is normally used).

So LiveView, preferably zoomed in, is the best option.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Geejay
Senior Member
Avatar
802 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 164
Joined Mar 2007
Location: North-West, Blighty
     
Jul 13, 2012 05:46 |  #15

Buzz Lightyear lenses that focus to infinity and beyond... :)


You can't erase a dream, you can only wake me up.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,176 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Amazingly basic question time
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1456 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.