sf_loft Member  212 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: San Francisco, CA More info | Jul 12, 2012 13:37 | #1 So I just got the 1.4x III teleconverter for my 70-200 f/4L IS and was also thinking of renting the 100-400L to take with. Should I not even bother and use the 70-200 with the extender? Canon EOS 5D Mark III & FUJIFILM X-T1 mirrorless 35mm f/1.4L | 85mm f/1.2L II |135mm f/2L | 16-35mm f/2.8L II | 24-70mm f/2.8L II | 70-200 f/4L IS | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | Jul 12, 2012 14:05 | #2 sf_loft wrote in post #14707376  So I just got the 1.4x III teleconverter for my 70-200 f/4L IS and was also thinking of renting the 100-400L to take with. Should I not even bother and use the 70-200 with the extender? I've been looking at the 100-400 sample gallery and it's ok and nothing beats the sharpness of my 70-200 f4, I don't even think my primes are as sharp. conditions: whale watching, rocking boat, early afternoon plenty of light. i have both lenses too, and for years. i'd take the 100-400L, which will outperform the 70-200L f4 IS +TC in all respects. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1731 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
