Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 15 Jul 2012 (Sunday) 19:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wide Open Only Lenses

 
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Jul 15, 2012 19:51 |  #1

Anyone have maybe an older lens, or a broken lens, or whatever, that you can still use but only wide open? Do you use it a lot, sometimes, or never? I have an older Sigma 180mm Macro which has excellent IQ, but it can only be used wide open on the DSLRs. I do have an old EOS620 on which it works fine. It's a great lens overall (IQ and 1:1 macro), and I just trying to decide if I should keep it. Oh, and because someone will tell me to, it's no longer supported by Sigma, and can not be re-chipped.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jul 15, 2012 22:31 |  #2

I had a sigma 24mm f/2.8 prime that was the same way. I still enjoyed it wide open on a 5D. None of the older lenses like this hold much value, so you may as well keep it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
albatros
Member
71 posts
Joined Oct 2002
     
Jul 16, 2012 07:25 |  #3

My 135L is in perfect working order, but I might not notice for a while if the aperture broke ;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jul 16, 2012 10:35 |  #4

Ha! I don't think I ever stopped down the 135L either when I owned it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:10 |  #5

I would say that for macro use the ability to stop down is very important. You can play with shallow DOF effects, but all your pictures would soon start to look the same. I should probably admit I am not a big fan of the shallow DOF effect that seems popular at the moment, but all the same, in macro even f/8 will not give a big DOF. For non-macro uses you should be fine.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimewall
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:23 |  #6

Madweasel wrote in post #14723982 (external link)
I would say that for macro use the ability to stop down is very important. You can play with shallow DOF effects, but all your pictures would soon start to look the same. I should probably admit I am not a big fan of the shallow DOF effect that seems popular at the moment, but all the same, in macro even f/8 will not give a big DOF. For non-macro uses you should be fine.

Agreed! For a portrait lens, maybe?!? Not for a macro lens!


Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 16, 2012 12:51 |  #7

Scanning film is rather tedious. You could consider trying a Canon 10D camera which may still stop down properly with your Sigma lens as the 10D seems to be the break point. You'd have decent digital macro system for little money. I've seen Canon D30, D60, and 10D bodies go very cheaply on Craigslist.


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZoneV
Goldmember
1,644 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 250
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
Jul 16, 2012 13:17 |  #8

I have some lenses without moveable iris - only one f-stop:
Mirror lens (catdioptric) 500/8 and 1000/10.
Microphotographic lenses like Olympus 50/3.5.
Microscopy lenses like Nikon CF Plan 10x n.A.0.3
Relay lenses
Reprographic lenses like Rodenstock Apo Gerogon

Some of these lenses are so sharp that it seems every smaller aperture will deteriorate image quality


DIY-Homepage (external link) - Image Gallery (external link) - Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Jul 16, 2012 13:24 |  #9

Cesium wrote in post #14723837 (external link)
Ha! I don't think I ever stopped down the 135L either when I owned it.

+1 from when I owned one, I dont think I ever considered stopping down either.


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Jul 16, 2012 15:04 as a reply to  @ elysium's post |  #10

Yeah, I really like the IQ of the lens, the FL is nice, and to have the true macro had been a bonus. I don't really do any macro stuff, but it's nice to know I have the option if I want it.

You guys have totally swayed me to keep the lens. For what I paid for it, I couldn't touch a lens with half the IQ. I have my trusty EOS620 from back in the day, and the lens works fine on it, so if I wanted, I also have that. But I do like it for a portrait lens as well, albeit a little long.

Here's one I took of my daughter over the weekend using it, only brought out the colors a bit, and resized, otherwise SOOC:

IMAGE: http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr224/Beefer518/Camera%20stuff/C_fountain2-2a.jpg

If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,186 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Wide Open Only Lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2847 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.