Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Jul 2012 (Monday) 11:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Save for glass, or update body?

 
Russo09
Senior Member
737 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:23 |  #1

I'm at that point where I'm wanting something new, but just not sure what the smarter move would be. I love my T2i now, but the allure of a FF camera hasn't escaped my mind since I've really learned and progressed with my camera. I shoot a lot of landscapes and stud of that sort, so I feel like FF would be the way to go with a body upgrade. Plus the auto focus of my T2i hasn't really been making me the happiest. But then again, if I'm upgrading my body it'd probably be to a 5Dc to keep the costs somewhat lower, which is why I'm thinking buying glass might be better, do I can get more quality out of my money. I want a wide angle, but knowing how badly I want to go FF, I don't want to get a 10-22 or something else that I wouldn't be able to use when the time comes.

Any suggestions for me on my little predicament? Lol


-Nick
Canon 5D Mark 3 | Sigma 85mm 1.4 | Canon 17-40mm f2L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:30 |  #2

To be kind, your lenses are mediocre. If the camera fairy handed you a new FF camera you would still only have one that would work. Start upgrading your glass now so you can take advantage of the upgrade when you do get a new camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jamesb
Senior Member
Avatar
383 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: USA
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:36 |  #3

I'd go with glass before a body. You can keep higher end glass for a long time. If you keep swapping bodies without upgrading glass you arn't going to see a big step in quality of photos (sharpness, bokah, etc).

If you have the $$ a 5D is a good deal now, but I still recommend glass first.


Canon gear
CT Wedding Photographer
www.jamesbernatchez.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Duderino
Goldmember
Avatar
1,921 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:40 |  #4

Judging from your lens list, you should upgrade your glass first.


Nikon D600 | Bower 14mm f/2.8 | Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR | Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR
500px (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Russo09
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
737 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:48 |  #5

Yea the lenses I have now surely are no where good. I've been thinking about the 17-55, but then my whole thing about going FF would make that have to go too. I guess I just gotta find out which lenses and focal lengths work best for me and then go from there with what would/wouldn't work in the future.


-Nick
Canon 5D Mark 3 | Sigma 85mm 1.4 | Canon 17-40mm f2L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 16, 2012 11:52 |  #6

Russo09 wrote in post #14724134 (external link)
Yea the lenses I have now surely are no where good. I've been thinking about the 17-55, but then my whole thing about going FF would make that have to go too. I guess I just gotta find out which lenses and focal lengths work best for me and then go from there with what would/wouldn't work in the future.

Good lenses, especially L lenses or faux L lenses like the 17-55 2.8 IS hold their value extremely well. I suspect if you bought that lens used right now at a fair price, you would sell it for a profit if you held it for a year or more. Its very easy to sell good glass as long as you price it reasonably.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Jul 16, 2012 12:24 |  #7

gonzogolf wrote in post #14724155 (external link)
Good lenses, especially L lenses or faux L lenses like the 17-55 2.8 IS hold their value extremely well. I suspect if you bought that lens used right now at a fair price, you would sell it for a profit if you held it for a year or more. Its very easy to sell good glass as long as you price it reasonably.

I totally agree. Buy for your current body, not for what you "might" upgrade to in the future. If you purchase quality glass you will have no problem selling down the road should you go full frame.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScubaDude
Goldmember
Avatar
1,104 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Waveland, MS
     
Jul 16, 2012 13:33 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Upgrading my glass has been like having a whole new camera. So you kind of get both when you upgrade glass.


Canon [7D & BG-E7 grip] [T1i & BG-E5 grip] [400mm f/5.6L] [50mm f/1.8 II] [18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS]
Induro [AT313 tripod] [AM25 monopod] [GHB2 gimbal head]
My Flickr page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmnelson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,286 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 16, 2012 14:47 |  #9

FWIW at this point you don't really even have the option of getting a full-frame body without upgrading your lenses at the same time. Of what you have, the 50 is the only thing that would even work on full-frame.

So as the others have said, glass first -- if you know with certainty that you will go FF in the next year or so then work on getting compatible lenses. Otherwise look into something like a 17-55 or third-party equivalent, as the others have mentioned.


Gear | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skahorse
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jul 16, 2012 14:49 |  #10

ScubaDude wrote in post #14724601 (external link)
Upgrading my glass has been like having a whole new camera. So you kind of get both when you upgrade glass.

I agree with this statement.

Btw- I would love to have a T2i. I'm shooting a 5 year old 400D... But the glass makes all the difference. It feels like a brand new camera. Definitely worth the money.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Jul 16, 2012 15:47 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #14724057 (external link)
To be kind, your lenses are mediocre. If the camera fairy handed you a new FF camera you would still only have one that would work. Start upgrading your glass now so you can take advantage of the upgrade when you do get a new camera.

That hurt me.. and i don't even posted in thsi thread.
So is it just the big red L lenses that are good? I've been looking at Tamrons 90mm 2.8, people say it's awesome.


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 16, 2012 15:53 |  #12

bent toe wrote in post #14725303 (external link)
That hurt me.. and i don't even posted in thsi thread.
So is it just the big red L lenses that are good? I've been looking at Tamrons 90mm 2.8, people say it's awesome.

I havent used it, so I cant say. There are plenty of non-L lenses that are good, the OP doesnt have any of them though. As noted, the EF-S lenses the OP owns wont work on the Full Frame camera he lusts for.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sambarino
Senior Member
549 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jul 16, 2012 16:13 |  #13

Russo09 wrote in post #14724037 (external link)
I'm at that point where I'm wanting something new, but just not sure what the smarter move would be. I love my T2i now, but the allure of a FF camera hasn't escaped my mind since I've really learned and progressed with my camera. I shoot a lot of landscapes and stud of that sort, so I feel like FF would be the way to go with a body upgrade. Plus the auto focus of my T2i hasn't really been making me the happiest. But then again, if I'm upgrading my body it'd probably be to a 5Dc to keep the costs somewhat lower, which is why I'm thinking buying glass might be better, do I can get more quality out of my money. I want a wide angle, but knowing how badly I want to go FF, I don't want to get a 10-22 or something else that I wouldn't be able to use when the time comes.

Any suggestions for me on my little predicament? Lol

What? The 10-22 has less distortion at the wide end than either the 16-35 or the 17-40. And it is decently sharp wide-open across the entire frame, which is not true of either of the other two lenses. I don't know what effect full-frame will have on your landscape shots. I believe you will be hard pressed to do better than the 10-22 on a cropper. I do use the 10-22 on a 500D and 60D. Comparisons to other lenses thanks to the-digital-picture.com.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jul 16, 2012 23:27 as a reply to  @ sambarino's post |  #14

Go with glass. You can always update the body later.


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
3Rotor
Senior Member
953 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 802
Joined May 2009
Location: Oklahoma
     
Jul 16, 2012 23:42 |  #15

Good glass will make a huge difference. It doesn't have to be an "L" to be good. There are plenty of consumer lenses out there that perform on par with the red rings.


Instagram (external link)
www.jessemak.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,517 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Save for glass, or update body?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1238 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.