extenders for the 70-200 2.8 II

Can someone tell me what they found to work best with the 70-200 2.8 II for extenders Both the 1.4 and the 2 version II or III

Thank you kindly...

I use the 1.4x II with great results and the 2x III which is great. Most people agree it's not worth the premium with the 1.4x to get the III over the II... But for the 2x, it is.

I would like to know this as well, I'm debating on getting the 1.4 III or 2x III.

If you get the 1.4, get the 1.4 version II, not version III.

nightcat wrote in post #14724765
If you get the 1.4, get the 1.4 version II, not version III.

Why's that? I read that the III is well built. Unless it doesn't matter?

I have the x2 III, takes pretty good pics to me?

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/wallerni/628074​9106/

w/2X III

In searching for answers since posting, I have learned, the advantage of the 1.4 III over the II is its better on the edges. It went on to say that if you use a cropped camera and you crop, it wont make a difference. Conversely if you use a FF it will make a difference..

From all the reading I have done thus far, if the ef 2 is what you want the III is better than the II. It went onto say the IQ is that of the 100-400 with the III

Maybe its time to see some images using these extenders, so if you have some images, would you kindly post them here or have links to images using various extenders..

I use the III 2x. really like it. IQ is very good. Only thing with using an extender 2x is you lose 2 stops of light and the AF speed decrease with 50%.

I have some pictures with the 70-200 II en III 2x on a 7D and 5D II
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/superdaantje

Invertalon wrote in post #14724536
I use the 1.4x II with great results and the 2x III which is great. Most people agree it's not worth the premium with the 1.4x to get the III over the II... But for the 2x, it is.

This.

I use the 2xIII and happy with the combo

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/kin2son/7470078​482/

Invertalon wrote in post #14724536
I use the 1.4x II with great results and the 2x III which is great. Most people agree it's not worth the premium with the 1.4x to get the III over the II... But for the 2x, it is.

+1

I use the 1.4x III with my 70-200 II and love it.

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Here are some I took with the 2x III on mine:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​243818/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​241676/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​229908/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​240478/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​237668/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​252360/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/invertalon/7488​245918/

Invertalon wrote in post #14724536
I use the 1.4x II with great results and the 2x III which is great. Most people agree it's not worth the premium with the 1.4x to get the III over the II... But for the 2x, it is.

Good to know, as I have the 1.4 II , now just need to pick up the 2 III

All these images are looking sweeeeeeet with the extender.

Thanks for sharing everyone. 1.4xII and 2.0xII should be home today for me to play with. I can't wait.