There are a couple of ways of clarifying this apparent contradiction. Here's one:
I charged $200 to shoot my first wedding. So my prices were low, the expectations of my client (who was getting a deal and who understood what my experience level was) was commensurate with that.
The expectations I have in terms of the photos I want of my wedding (should that happen !) are higher than that of the person looking to pay $200 for a wedding. So it isn't surprising that I wouldn't hire the me who shot that first wedding.
More plainly though, photography is an art--it's subjective. I can present a perfectly good product that satisfies a large number of people without necessarily being fully satisfied about the product for myself. As has been pointed out, photographers are often incredibly picky; and in fact, it is in part because of self-doubt that we strive to do better and better work--even if where we started was pretty good.
Finally, it's also possible for a photographer to do quality work in a style A and then eventually, after shooting dozens of weddings, arrive at style B--both being perfectly acceptable interpretations. This photographer might say to themselves at this point--Ah--I've finally arrived at the style that I personally would like the photos of my wedding to take.
rob0225 wrote in post #14752031
So I get this straight. There are photographers on here who at one point were charging people to shoot their weddings but at the same time would not have hired themselves? Confusing.