Iron Man shot with 135L at f/2 and Sigma 50 at f/1.4

Really slow day so here are a couple shot wide open with my two favorite lens.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

I really have to get a second body so I don't have to keep switching lens on the 7D.

Flickr
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.

A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

e=mc ** 2

A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

maatt wrote in post #14750194
Maybe just because I'm viewing on my phone, but does the Sigma look a bit better?

DOF is alot thinner on the 135 so not much is in focus tis all.

A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

maatt wrote in post #14750194
Maybe just because I'm viewing on my phone, but does the Sigma look a bit better?

I often think the same thing after I get home from a shoot. The Sigma does have some amazing bokeh quality. I will probably pick up the Sigma 85 f/1.4 after owning the 50.

I am definitely a prime guy but I will eventually own the 24-105 f/4 and the 70-200 f4.


And my sister was always saying that about my cameras so I had to have a comeback since she is a cake decorator and baker by trade.

Flickr
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.

Thorrulz wrote in post #14750239
I often think the same thing after I get home from a shoot. The Sigma does have some amazing bokeh quality. I will probably pick up the Sigma 85 f/1.4 after owning the 50.

I am definitely a prime guy but I will eventually own the 24-105 f/4 and the 70-200 f4.


And my sister was always saying that about my cameras so I had to have a comeback since she is a cake decorator and baker by trade.

That's about the same gear list I'm looking to get: 17-40, 24-105, 70-200 and then throw in a Sigma 50 1,4.

e=mc ** 2

maatt wrote in post #14750292
That's about the same gear list I'm looking to get: 17-40, 24-105, 70-200 and then throw in a Sigma 50 1,4.

I use to own the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG EX HSM II (what a mouthfull) and it was an excellent performer albeit heavy as heck. So I think the Canon 70-200 f/4 IS will be much lighter and still give me some awesome image quality.

Flickr
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.