Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 22 Jul 2012 (Sunday) 09:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 2.8 is grainy

 
dino70544
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 22, 2012 11:16 |  #16

it was some poor lighting, its a new arena and i think the ceiling is way too high for the amount of lights they had which wasn't much. i was using. i was using veal. metering because of all the white ice, i figured that would be my best chance at getting enough light in the camera without a flash




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maximus_73
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2012
     
Jul 22, 2012 11:22 |  #17

Does not look anything wrong with the camera nor lens, it's just underexposed and caused grainy image.


Cameras: Canon EOS M, FujiFilm X-T1| Lenses: FD 50mm 1.4, Fujinon 23mm 1.4, Fujinon 56 1.2, Zeiss 32mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dino70544
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 22, 2012 11:24 |  #18

well today is a new day and ill be going to a different hockey arena and try and shoot again, i was just concerned that maybe my lens was having some issues
thanks for all ya'lls input




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrAl
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 22, 2012 11:28 |  #19

dino70544 wrote in post #14752188 (external link)
well today is a new day and ill be going to a different hockey arena and try and shoot again, i was just concerned that maybe my lens was having some issues
thanks for all ya'lls input

BTW welcome to the forums!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dino70544
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 22, 2012 11:41 |  #20

thank you, i wasn't expecting such quick responses, this surly proves that this is a very active forum, i have bookmarked it, now i need to figure out how i can be notified without having to watch the page




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Jul 22, 2012 11:54 |  #21

At the top of the thread click on "Thread Tools" then "Subscribe" and you can get instant email notification.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,665 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1266
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Jul 22, 2012 12:21 |  #22

sambarino wrote in post #14751897 (external link)
My 60D is pretty clean at 1600. ETTR can help, but look at your current exposure. To use ETTR, you will have to either raise ISO, increasing graininess, or lower shutter speed, increasing the chance of motion blur. I would move to a flash and lower ISO to 400 or so. I know that flash is not always an option.

But I've found that raising the ISO to allow a slight overexposure seems to cause less noise than using the lower ISO and adjusting shadows in post. ETTR isn't always going to work if it results in key highlights being blown out, but if the dark areas are important to the composition, then ETTR by bumping the ISO may be the only possible solution. As you say, flash isn't always an option.

I've shot as high as ISO 3200 with a T1i with acceptably correctable noise. One time, even though I had and was using a flash, I wanted this particular portrait to capture the environment. Even at 3200 the SS was 1/13 at f2.8.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,095 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
70-200 2.8 is grainy
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2269 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.