Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 22 Jul 2012 (Sunday) 16:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Raw to Jpeg I get this!?

 
tristan
Senior Member
322 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Missouri
     
Jul 22, 2012 16:11 |  #1

When I edit a RAW image and save it to a JPEG the image has all these artifacts in it. Why? It's a 19 MB file.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/07/4/LQ_606920.jpg
Image hosted by forum (606920) © tristan [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 22, 2012 17:45 |  #2

It looks MASSIVELY over sharpened. What Raw converter? Can you post the DPP version, with all settings at default?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArcticShooter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Jul 22, 2012 19:15 |  #3

I would also so too much sharpening and then noise reduction is very high


Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jul 23, 2012 05:00 |  #4

I usually get a less dramatic but similar issue when I don't purposely prepare images for web viewing. Preparing an image for printing you are probably near the mark, but that level of sharpening looks terrible when viewed on screen.

You should also carefully consider what type of sharpening an image needs, there are dozens, if not hundreds of different sharpening methods. Obviously the sky in your image did not need any/as much.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Jul 23, 2012 07:23 as a reply to  @ Lowner's post |  #5

I don't routinly sharpen my skies.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,438 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 23, 2012 07:42 |  #6

I agree--looks hugely oversharpened.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 24, 2012 06:49 |  #7

ArcticShooter wrote in post #14753863 (external link)
I would also so too much sharpening and then noise reduction is very high

^^^ This

tim wrote in post #14753550 (external link)
It looks MASSIVELY over sharpened. What Raw converter? Can you post the DPP version, with all settings at default?

"Default" would be "in camera settings".
Everything zeroed (including sharpening and NR) would be of more use.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,740 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Raw to Jpeg I get this!?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1407 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.