Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 23 Jul 2012 (Monday) 13:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lenses for Swallows in Flight

 
Bsmooth
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Jul 23, 2012 13:51 |  #1

I have a place where I can go and practice shooting images of these amazing little flyers as much as I want on weekends.
Thats where i have been with my 1DMk2 and 100-400 for the past 4 weekends.
I have tried all sorts of different settings, and so far i think I have maybe 1 - 4 images that are fairly sharp, and in focus.
All of the above are shot at 1/800 or above.
I also wonder about how fast the lens focuses, as the 100-400 doesn't seem very swift in that department. I also have a 70-200 without IS, and wondered If it would focus faster. These birds actually come within 4 to 10 feet sometime, so I don't always need the range , just the speed.
I've also found I get better focusing against the grass as oopoosed to open sky. It may be because the grass is fairly brown now, and provides a good contrast to the darker backed birds.


Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kraig ­ C
Goldmember
Avatar
2,227 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Jul 24, 2012 02:36 |  #2

I've tried and tried with the swallows in flight.. It's hit and miss, mostly miss. If you take some time to watch the birds and find a common area where they are flying into a head wind it will give you that little bit of extra time to get them in frame and in focus. They are VERY difficult for Bird in flight shots.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jul 24, 2012 08:34 |  #3

i've tried my 70-200 with IS off, i confess - i don't know how people get shots of these things




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2slo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,505 posts
Gallery: 1111 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 17814
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jul 24, 2012 11:29 as a reply to  @ rick_reno's post |  #4

A couple of points from someone with limited success shooting Swallows if I may. I've been fortunate enough to be in an area where there were several Swallows flying rounds, doing circuits apparently. I've had time to consider the technique and I made a bit of progress, others may disagree but this is what I did.
I found it best not to try to fill the frame with the bird, but rather to shoot from 20 to 30 feet away. This allows you to crop any result you get whilst still retaining some detail and it's not so close that it becomes impossible to try to track their erratic flight.
A fast shutter speed is essential (about 1/2000 sec I suggest, assuming you shoot on manual, if you do it using aperture priority then you'll have to use an ISO high enough to give a similar speed whilst allowing for an aperture of around f/8) IS isn't really necessary as the shutter speed will make it's use pointless and slow down your focus. A good panning action is needed (move your hips and keep your hands and arms steady) and lastly try to shoot both eyes open if you can so you can hold focus on the bird (in AI servo) with back button focussing whilst watching for changes in direction.
All very well in theory but my results aren't nearly as good as I'd like, however:

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8152/7211387124_f377e82383_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7230/7204716062_de50b3c01a_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8012/7181536016_1a6449d09c_b.jpg

HTH :)

ETA: all these were with the 400mm f/5.6 lens, the 1st two with the addition of the 1.4x TC III, this lens doesn't have IS, so that's not an issue!



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bsmooth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Jul 24, 2012 11:38 as a reply to  @ 2slo's post |  #5

I guess my shooting at 1/800 to 1/1000 probably may not be fast enough then. I usually shoot with my camera set on TV and set the shutter speed, and let the camera decide the aperture.
I am also set at ISO 125, whereas I suppose I could go a little higher.
I usually just keep my finger on the button halfway and when it focuses I hit the button. Exposure wise the shots have been great, just mostly blurry birds or fuzzy grass !


Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2slo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,505 posts
Gallery: 1111 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 17814
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jul 24, 2012 11:47 |  #6

Bsmooth wrote in post #14762506 (external link)
I guess my shooting at 1/800 to 1/1000 probably may not be fast enough then. I usually shoot with my camera set on TV and set the shutter speed, and let the camera decide the aperture.
I am also set at ISO 125, whereas I suppose I could go a little higher.
I usually just keep my finger on the button halfway and when it focuses I hit the button. Exposure wise the shots have been great, just mostly blurry birds or fuzzy grass !

OK a couple of quick points: your shutter speed is far too low for Swallows, what you're using would do for Gulls and the like but all you can expect is blur at that speed. Don't pre suppose what ISO you need, decide on a shutter speed in manual mode, decide on an aperture and set an appropriate ISO to correctly expose the shot, or if you aren't comfortable with that, leave the camera on auto ISO until you're happier setting it yourself. Look up back button focussing on here, it's well documented, many people will tell you their success rate has improved since using it and I wouldn't now use anything else.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,007 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47146
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jul 24, 2012 13:25 |  #7

I'm not getting far either.
But whilst shooting them I have observed them.
Sometimes you can find an area where the ground topology makes for a good head wind. I have noticed they tend to slow up at these points and often turn to do another circuit.

Probably best moved to talk about birds.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bsmooth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Jul 24, 2012 13:32 as a reply to  @ Lester Wareham's post |  #8

Never much cared for auto ISO, which is why I use Shutter priority mode. I don't like much going above ISO 400, for noise. I've tried the back button focusing a few times, and just couldn't get used to it, but I'll have to try it again at some point.


Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
recrisp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,795 posts
Gallery: 196 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 4114
Joined May 2008
Location: Paris, Texas
     
Jul 24, 2012 13:43 |  #9

Bsmooth wrote in post #14757752 (external link)
I have a place where I can go and practice shooting images of these amazing little flyers as much as I want on weekends.
Thats where i have been with my 1DMk2 and 100-400 for the past 4 weekends.
I have tried all sorts of different settings, and so far i think I have maybe 1 - 4 images that are fairly sharp, and in focus.
All of the above are shot at 1/800 or above.
I also wonder about how fast the lens focuses, as the 100-400 doesn't seem very swift in that department. I also have a 70-200 without IS, and wondered If it would focus faster. These birds actually come within 4 to 10 feet sometime, so I don't always need the range , just the speed.
I've also found I get better focusing against the grass as oopoosed to open sky. It may be because the grass is fairly brown now, and provides a good contrast to the darker backed birds.

I have tried to take shots of them myself using a T2i and a 100-400mm, it's not easy, at all... :D
What I did find to help a lot was to zoom out as much as needed to be able to see where the bird is, and follow it until you see it coming at you, or close, then zoom in to follow it until you feel the need to shoot. Trying to focus on them, or, FIND THEM is the hardest part for me. :) That helped a LOT, I have a 1DIV but haven't tried to shoot those birds again lately, soon, I will, I'm sure. It sure is FUN though! I love to try, I literally suck at it, but it doesn't matter, I have a good time, and people stare at me like I'm some sort of nut! heh
Try turning off the IS on the lens, and see if that speeds it up for you. Like you said, try the 70-200, you don't need the 100-400mm for those birds, and you will probably get more shots using it too.
Back in the early Spring of this year was my first and ONLY time shooting them, but I learned a lot trying, like that my T2i wasn't fast enough in the FPS department, and that since I now have the f/2.8 400mm lens, the 100-400mm is a TINY lens in comparison, I still have it, so I will try again on the wily little-bitty birds!

Good luck!

Randy


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bsmooth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Jul 24, 2012 13:53 as a reply to  @ recrisp's post |  #10

Lots of good advice, and I agree, shooting images of them is quite a challenge,maybe thats why its such fun.
I was thinking of trying a T2i too, maybe have to second think that one. Maybe a 60D or 7D, for landscapes and bird photography, doing double duty.


Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
recrisp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,795 posts
Gallery: 196 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 4114
Joined May 2008
Location: Paris, Texas
     
Jul 24, 2012 14:02 |  #11

Bsmooth wrote in post #14763122 (external link)
Lots of good advice, and I agree, shooting images of them is quite a challenge,maybe thats why its such fun.
I was thinking of trying a T2i too, maybe have to second think that one. Maybe a 60D or 7D, for landscapes and bird photography, doing double duty.

Definitely get what you can afford, I mean, the best you can afford! :)
I'd go for the 7D if you can, I was saving up for one, then I decided to go for the 1D, I still have buyer's remorse, but I won't regret it later, and neither will you if you can a 7D, or whatever

You're only young once. (I just made that up) :D:rolleyes:

Randy


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Milutiche
Senior Member
Avatar
819 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
     
Jul 26, 2012 14:10 |  #12

the best photos of Swallows i've caught is about a second after they land, they are super hard to capture sharp!


www.actionimages.net.n​z
Gear List
Sports Photos on Facebook (external link)
Sports Photos on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nordlysBW
Senior Member
Avatar
378 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 46
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jul 27, 2012 16:45 as a reply to  @ Milutiche's post |  #13

I keep losing them in flight not only because they are swift but primarily because I still find their sudden changes of tack unpredictable even after hours spent observing them.

My best chances of getting a shot so far have been when they flutter right in front of the nest or when they try to land close to those who already occupy the best spots on the roof gables. Getting them right after take off from there also works for me. I'll obviously have to keep trying ...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
teekay
Goldmember
Avatar
3,037 posts
Likes: 799
Joined Apr 2001
Location: British Columbia, Canada
     
Jul 27, 2012 18:54 as a reply to  @ nordlysBW's post |  #14

Swallows are tough, but swifts are tougher!

The tiny, incredibly fast and erratically flying Vaux's swifts must be the ultimate challenge.:rolleyes:

I was once where hundreds were flying around very close in perfect weather but was unable to get a single good shot or even video.

If anyone has a good shot of those in flight, let us know the secret.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nature ­ Nut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,366 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2012
Location: NY
     
Jul 27, 2012 19:05 |  #15

I've actually had better success using manual focusing while tracking them with a decent DOF and SS. But I am crazy like that. Ive also tried focusing on a static object and letting them cross the area of view instead of tracking them. Both have worked better for me versus swinging my lens around like a wild man using BBF Ai Servo like I do for other critters. Shooting flying songbirds and especially the acrobatic ones is high up on the BIF challenge level any day of the week.


Adam - Upstate NY:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,458 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Lenses for Swallows in Flight
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1618 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.